Romo barely won last year's opener, and that was with a come from behind touchdown, so I don't see what Romo would have done that would have been so different... and that was to a Giant's team prior to them investing a ton of money into their defense. Dak has done enough to win games. How has he not showed enough to win games when we were a Terrance Williams sideline and a Dan Bailey fieldgoal away from winning?
we didn't lose because of what williams did, that would have set up a 62 yd field goal. So stop with that.
Romo has the whole offense at his hands and can get out of plays. When they walk 9 guys to the line of scrimmage he would have moved guys around and gotten out of the plays.
I am not saying dak is bad or we lost because of him, what I am saying is he is not good enough to play at the level this team needs to win because of this horrendous defense.
and last year romo lost dez and didn't have him for the game so he was playing with williams, beasley and street. Everything about it was different but mostly its Romo's understanding of the game and what to do in big situations that was the difference today.