What would you do about Roy? Trade him?

zrinkill;1713528 said:
Since you missed it .... I will repeat.

The Colts and Pats safeties get beat just as much, if not more, than Roy .....

Dallas, I think, has a better secondary than the Colts and just as good of one as the Pats .....

"Get It!"


Been following this thread with some curiosity and just wondered if you really think Roy Willams is a better overall safety than Bob Sanders?

Not trying to troll, just wondering how you feel Roy Williams is a better SS then Sanders?
 
zrinkill;1714114 said:
He cannot win with some of these agenda boys.

I am trying to stay out of this thread now as I have added my two cents and have nothing more to really offer.However.I do have to ask about your continuing references to poster's "agendas"Why on earth would you think that a fan of the Dallas Cowboys would make it their "agenda" to talk negatively about a player?What could the "agenda" be?Does the management of the Cowboys monitor this forum and make decisions based on how the majority of members feel?No offense but it takes away from your credibility when you keep resorting to attacking the poster rather then discussing the post.
 
JustSayNotoTO;1714184 said:
I diddnt believe Plax then, but I am starting to come around to believing what he said. He is a big man that dives at peoples feet.

The fans have been on him for his coverage since at least 04, its not like this is some new fangled thing to criticize him.

If he cant cover, and he cant properly tackle, then what is it that he is doing for the team right now that someone else (cheaper) couldnt do?

He makes far too much money for the excuses that get tossed around for him.

If he was as terrible as the fans make him out to be there would be personnel changes.

In all reality we as fans do not know who has been blowing coverage, the staff and the team knows, period.

I don't care what Tom Jackson or whoever "broke" down RW's play against the Pats... if people haven't noticed ESPN loves to hate us.

Hamlin was actually the guy who stuck out most in Sunday's game... he looked very lost and confused on several big plays.


Bottom line though is this - we played the Pats. Brady has 21 TDs and 2 INTs. He is playing lights out. He will make EVERY secondary he faces look foolish.
 
smarta5150;1714200 said:
If he was as terrible as the fans make him out to be there would be personnel changes.

In all reality we as fans do not know who has been blowing coverage, the staff and the team knows, period.

I don't care what Tom Jackson or whoever "broke" down RW's play against the Pats... if people haven't noticed ESPN loves to hate us.

Hamlin was actually the guy who stuck out most in Sunday's game... he looked very lost and confused on several big plays.


Bottom line thought is this - we played the Pats. Brady has 21 TDs and 2 INTs. He is playing lights out. He will make EVERY secondary he faces look foolish.


Oh so thats it, Roy is playing poorly because ESPN hates us. Keep the excuse machine rolling.
 
AdamJT13;1714196 said:
Right. So now if Watson runs a curl in front of Roy and Moss runs a post behind Roy, which one does Roy cover? They're both in his zone.



What kind of question is that? He runs down the field until he's in the back of the end zone and turns inside, like any other receiver does on any other curl.

So who covers whom?



Why would they run into each other? Watson is running along the goal line, while Moss is in the back corner?

So who covers whom?



He runs to the back of the end zone and turns around, that's how.

Who covers whom?

i know u know alot about football. but why u continue to come up with excuse after excuse for roy i have no idea. sure he's a cowboy but he's not getting the job done.
 
Stasheroo is reading Adams posts and wishing he had Tom Jacksons phone number lol
 
JustSayNotoTO;1714205 said:
Oh so thats it, Roy is playing poorly because ESPN hates us. Keep the excuse machine rolling.

Do you watch any other games during the week?
 
Vtwin;1714198 said:
I am trying to stay out of this thread now as I have added my two cents and have nothing more to really offer.However.I do have to ask about your continuing references to poster's "agendas"Why on earth would you think that a fan of the Dallas Cowboys would make it their "agenda" to talk negatively about a player?What could the "agenda" be?Does the management of the Cowboys monitor this forum and make decisions based on how the majority of members feel?No offense but it takes away from your credibility when you keep resorting to attacking the poster rather then discussing the post.

1. they don't like the player for "x" reason.
2. they find article after article to support that view of why the player sucks.
3. they dismiss all other bits of news that can show otherwise.

it's *not* having an open mind about things because you have some "need" to see a player in a particular light.
 
Vtwin;1714198 said:
Why on earth would you think that a fan of the Dallas Cowboys would make it their "agenda" to talk negatively about a player

I have no clue ..... but a few of you tend to do it all the time .....

See Edunce, bbgun, Gimmie, stash, Kangaroo.


And I have never denied my agenda to point it out.
 
LatinMind;1714206 said:
i know u know alot about football. but why u continue to come up with excuse after excuse for roy i have no idea. sure he's a cowboy but he's not getting the job done.

I don't think he's coming up with excuses; I think the point he is making is only the Dallas Cowboy's staff know who's responsibility is who's on any given play and no matter how much tape Tom Jackson or any other person not employed by Jerry Jones breaks down, it doesn't mean a hill of beans.
 
AdamJT13;1714196 said:
Right. So now if Watson runs a curl in front of Roy and Moss runs a post behind Roy, which one does Roy cover? They're both in his zone.



What kind of question is that? He runs down the field until he's in the back of the end zone and turns inside, like any other receiver does on any other curl.

So who covers whom?



Why would they run into each other? Watson is running along the goal line, while Moss is in the back corner?

So who covers whom?



He runs to the back of the end zone and turns around, that's how.

Who covers whom?

I've answered your questions.

You apparently want to see and read what you want to.

Since we're getting all speculative anyway:

If the Cowboys had a strong safety who could cover would they have won that game?
 
dallasfaniac;1714224 said:
I don't think he's coming up with excuses; I think the point he is making is only the Dallas Cowboy's staff know who's responsibility is who's on any given play and no matter how much tape Tom Jackson or any other person not employed by Jerry Jones breaks down, it doesn't mean a hill of beans.

a breathe of common sense emerges!!!
 
stasheroo;1714228 said:
I've answered your questions.

You apparently want to see and read what you want to.

Since we're getting all speculative anyway:

If the Cowboys had a strong safety who could cover would they have won that game?

you asked how he could run a curl at the back of the endzone.

he told you.

you still did not answer.

dude, it must suck to be you. i'd play in traffic a lot if i were you.
 
iceberg;1714213 said:
1. they don't like the player for "x" reason.
2. they find article after article to support that view of why the player sucks.
3. they dismiss all other bits of news that can show otherwise.

it's *not* having an open mind about things because you have some "need" to see a player in a particular light.

You're right.

I have this sick need to see Roy Williams repeatedly beaten in coverage, costing my favorite team wins.

I'm twisted that way.

But apparently I can warp reality to make that happen.

Now I need to obsess about the lottery........
 
Wow ..... I thought Edunce was the worst on this forum at understanding Cover 2.

But some of you guys are giving him a run for his money.
 
stasheroo;1714209 said:
Yeah.

Me.

Tom Jackson.

Bill Belichick.

Wrong. Neither of them has said that, and Belichick had Brady throw in Roy's direction only a few times in the entire game. And never mind that on both of the touchdowns when you're blaming Roy, he had someone covered on the play. You're just assuming that Roy was covering the wrong guy, which you don't know.
 
Back
Top