What's the Difference between a "Key" Player Loss and a "Regular" Player Loss?

[Vintage]

PT.

Tucker is not a key loss. At all. He is bad.

Our OT spot is deeper than what it was last year. Sure, its not ideal. However, had we kept Tucker this year, he likely wouldn't have made the roster anyway. Why? Because, at best, he'd have been the 5th OT on the depth chart.

So...in other words, he'd likely had been cut.

Now, when your Eagles begin to cut their roster down, do you count those cut people as key losses to your team? You know....the training camp bodies? Are those key losses?

You better say yes, to remain consistant.

Because Tucker, if we had kept him, likely wouldn't have made it to the game day roster and would likely have been cut.

Therefore, hardly a key loss.

 

[Funxva]

Seems like you are hard at work right now...

:laugh1:

When I wake up, the wife has some great football food planned. (I needed a fix)

Damn, I hate the offseason.

Hah! I am multi-tasking! (Network Admin)

 

[Phoenix-Talon]

If I am off-base in this response I apologize. I cant read a PT post at this time. No offense PT. Its the beverages.

Not offended SaT ...I Understand. Everyone knows how regular the affects of prune juice can be!

Hey don't take that sitting down SaT eek: )! We're still cool!

 

[Phoenix-Talon]

Some discussion here. ... Your argument holds up well in my opinion PT.

Thnak you lspain! Some posters believe I'm merely defending a position that I really don't believe is true. But your point even validates the position further.

 

[superpunk]

Someone ****ing shoot me.

 

[Vintage]

Thnak you lspain! Some posters believe I'm merely defending a position that I really don't believe is true. But your point even validates the position further.

No...unfortunately.

I never said you didn't believe your position to be true.

I do think you honestly believe yourself.

Which......makes this thing that much more amusing.

 

[Phoenix-Talon]

17 more to go PT getting nervious(sP)? lol

Maybe if this were my 1,000th Post I'd be nervous ...but like I said earlier, I hadn't even noticed. I'm having too much fun exchanging ideas, dialogues, and Mixing it up with opponent perspectives. It doesn't get too much better than the Zone ...unless it's an Eagles MB of course.

 

[the kid 05]

http://img149.*************/img149/633/sp2ws2.jpg :shoot3: "hes not dying!!!"

 

[Vintage]

Someone ****ing shoot me.

I was wondering what he was going to do today to top himself.....

Guess I got my answer.

Huh.

I didn't see this coming. I was thinking we'd be back in the T.O. area...maybe he'd comment on how we'd be better if we still had Coakley....or Quincy Carter....

Something of that ilk.

But I didn't see this one coming.

 

[superpunk]

http://img149.*************/img149/633/sp2ws2.jpg :shoot3: "hes not dying!!!"

lmao....you're out of your league with that pea-shooter.

 

[Vintage]

Maybe if this were my 1,000th Post I'd be nervous ...but like I said earlier, I hadn't even noticed. I'm having too much fun exchanging ideas, dialogues, and Mixing it up with opponent perspectives. It doesn't get too much better than the Zone ...unless it's an Eagles MB of course.

Yep....closing in one number 1000.

Hard to believe I actually am close to that...considering the first thread I ever began posting in here (defending the Ranch)... I never saw this coming.

Keep making asinine comments so I can git 'er dun.

 

[SkinsandTerps]

Maybe if this were my 1,000th Post I'd be nervous ...but like I said earlier, I hadn't even noticed. I'm having too much fun exchanging ideas, dialogues, and Mixing it up with opponent perspectives. It doesn't get too much better than the Zone ...unless it's an Eagles MB of course.

Seriously PT, Direct me to a good Eagles MB. And not the one with the "tate'rs".

I always laugh about post counts too. I simply dont notice or care. I respond to threads I want to respond to and choose to ignore others.

 

[Vintage]

lmao....you're out of your league with that pea-shooter.

:shoot2: :shoot1: :shoot3: :clubbed: :chainsaw: :fight: :spanking: :chop: :bomb:

Is that enough?

 

[the kid 05]

lmao....you're out of your league with that pea-shooter.

i knew i would get a chuckle. the way that little guys head is bobbing when hes firing the gun hes not going to hit a thing

 

[superpunk]

I was wondering what he was going to do today to top himself.....

Guess I got my answer.

Huh.

I didn't see this coming. I was thinking we'd be back in the T.O. area...maybe he'd comment on how we'd be better if we still had Coakley....or Quincy Carter....

Something of that ilk.

But I didn't see this one coming.

I can't believe anyone would try to justify Torrin Tucker as a key loss.

The guy gave up MORE sacks per game than anyone in the entire league.

Add to it, the fact that he is being "replaced" by PRO-BOWLER Flozell ADAMS, along with other randomly capitalized words.

 

[Vintage]

I can't believe anyone would try to justify Torrin Tucker as a key loss.

The guy gave up MORE sacks per game than anyone in the entire league.

Add to it, the fact that he is being "replaced" by PRO-BOWLER Flozell ADAMS, along with other randomly capitalized words.

I know.

He keeps digging himself a hole. And he thinks, the more he digs, he can get himself out of it.

Keep digging PT. You are almost to China.

Out of curiousity, what was Tucker's total sacks given up?

 

[superpunk]

Is that enough?

ninja please......he's freaking superman.

 

[the kid 05]

I can't believe anyone would try to justify Torrin Tucker as a key loss.

The guy gave up MORE sacks per game than anyone in the entire league.

Add to it, the fact that he is being "replaced" by PRO-BOWLER Flozell ADAMS, along with other randomly capitalized words.

im sure many of us where glad when the bucs signed him its like : http://img223.*************/img223/4614/waveuc4.gif

 

[superpunk]

12.5 sacks

in 10 games.

6th round rookie Rob Pettiti, who was battling weight among other things, gave up 13, in 16 games.

So let's see.....on the one hand, we have Rob Pettiti, sixth round rookie, who gave up 0.81 sacks per game.

OTOH, we have third year pro Torrin Tucker, who gave up 1.25 sacks per game, being replaced by Flozell Adams.

Hmmmmm....

 

[Vintage]

12.5 sacks

in 10 games.

6th round rookie Rob Pettiti, who was battling weight among other things, gave up 13, in 16 games.

So let's see.....on the one hand, we have Rob Pettiti, sixth round rookie, who gave up 0.81 sacks per game.

OTOH, we have third year pro Torrin Tucker, who gave up 1.25 sacks per game, being replaced by Flozell Adams.

Hmmmmm....

So... its more of a "key loss" for opposing teams than us.

Maybe thats what PT meant.

I am sure there will be a thread saying so either later today, or tomorrow...