CowboyFanInLexKy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,211
- Reaction score
- 966
Very well saidTo get a reputation as a Comeback king, you have to get it done in the big games.
Very well saidTo get a reputation as a Comeback king, you have to get it done in the big games.
Great read and I agree.... I liked Romo and I like Dak. But truth be told, neither could get it done when the time arose. A bunch of garbage plays for stats. Neither have/had what it takes to get us to the SB.Romo's Ten Worst
The Worst of Tony Romo
Cowboys/Romo Ten Most Heartbreaking
Tony Romo’s Enigmatic Character and Flawed Career
Now to be clear, I liked Romo very much. But there is a line in being a fan where you either are so blind to reality because you are a fan, or you look hard at the facts and allow them to give you perspective. Romo could do some amazing things. But it seems throughout his career, when the important games were on the line - not just play-offs, but games against tough teams to show the league who these Cowboys were, - Romo would end up becoming a gunslinger and throw a pass he could not make.
And in each game, this board would made excuses for him by blaming the defense. I especially like the game in Texas Stadium against Peyton Manning where both defenses could not stop the other team.
Until.... in the shadow of his own goalpost, Romo throws into double coverage and gifts the pick to the Broncos. This board blamed the defense and would not acknowledge Romo made that decision. The real tell-tale aspect of that defensive excuse was Manning had the ball within the twenty yard line for a TD and could not crack that defense in that series to score a TD. The Broncos were forced to kick a field goal.
Again, I liked Romo. But I also saw him for what he was. A pass happy, bargain basement version of Brett Favre.
Label me as a hater if you will. But if the anchor post in this thread shows stats which ignore the games where the stakes were the highest, and where Romo failed and cost the team the game, then that is cherry-picking.
I despised Bill Parcells. But he called it. You are what your record says you are.
I just love how much respect Aikman gets around here. He might have won one or two if he leaned on Emmitt. Never would have won one without Jimmy. He's a lot like Favre a gunslinger and Favre only won one. Aikman was more responsible for that 95 title than anyone. He was practically the coach. I don't think Tony had the discipline to give it to the running game. Troy wasn't into stats. He did what was best for the team. I still remember that Detroit game where we were up 27-3 in the middle of the 3rd quarter and we lost the game because Romo kept throwing the ball.Romo with Troy's teams wins 4 or 5 Super Bowls.
1. Staubach
2. Romo
3. Meredith
4. Aikman
5. White
6. Prescott
7. Morton
8. Bledsoe
9. Buerlein
10. Testeverde
Troy was limited. Good arm with good accuracy for short and intermediate throws, but no mobility in the pocket, so he couldn't work through reads like Romo. He was a statue.I just love how much respect Aikman gets around here. He might have won one or two if he leaned on Emmitt. Never would have won one without Jimmy. He's a lot like Favre a gunslinger and Favre only won one. Aikman was more responsible for that 95 title than anyone. He was practically the coach. I don't think Tony had the discipline to give it to the running game. Troy wasn't into stats. He did what was best for the team. I still remember that Detroit game where we were up 27-3 in the middle of the 3rd quarter and we lost the game because Romo kept throwing the ball.
I have an autographed picture of him, but only because my nephew gave it to me for Christmas. I do display it though.I rooted for Dak in 2016 and supported him as the starter over Romo. Romo's body was done.
I have supported Dak ever since. I'm an objective fan. And as an objective fan I place Romo equal or close to Roger and Aikman. Just didn't have great coach or team around him. Quarterbacks can never win big without it. Same for Dak.
Does that match your description of an "over the top Romo fan"? Never had a Romo jersey or poster but may buy one in your honor.
Enjoy your holiday.
Not sure how many SBs he'd win, but I'm very certain that Romo would do better with Aikman's teams than Aikman would do with Romo's.Romo with Troy's teams wins 4 or 5 Super Bowls.
1. Staubach
2. Romo
3. Meredith
4. Aikman
5. White
6. Prescott
7. Morton
8. Bledsoe
9. Buerlein
10. Testeverde
Well If Romo played then chances are we would have to come from behind.Troy was limited. Good arm with good accuracy for short and intermediate throws, but no mobility in the pocket, so he couldn't work through reads like Romo. He was a statue.
Troy had a perfect offense and culture around him and a defense that cleaned up most of his mistakes. Almost never had to come from behind because teams didn't score against Dallas much.
His greatest game was in a loss to San Fran in the playoffs.
That seems to be the goalWhat's the goal? Nothing short of a SB would have made the Romo haters happy.
right mr 141 iNTS was jImmey man..lmao get real..yes they would have played them Danny white was sin fact like romo and was in Fact Landrys choice..We must consider the HCs too. Landry RIP wouldn't put up with Tony's INTs just like he didn't with Pelluer's.
Jimmy wouldn't even let Romo on the field. Jimmy was about cerebral and pedigree players. Romo had neither.
Every Qb is suppose to know where the check down is when those 1st or 2nd reads are not there. You don't have to progress through all the reads to get to the check down.Your reply makes one again wonder about your comprehension of a quarterbacks' progressions and how fundamental that is to every passing play. If you don't understand that, you are helpless to properly critique Quarterback play.
Progressions precede decisions. You do read one, then make a decision. You look at read two and then make a second decision. You look at read three and then a third decision. Etc. Romo's progression sequence never got to Murray.
Romo, matched if not outplayed Manning by any objective measurement (completion percentage, yards per pass, points, TDs per pass, interception avoidance) preceding the two plays I showed in GIFS. Sorry if it doesn't match your long held agenda.
Romo had the ball 2.5 seconds before the DT initiated contact with him. I have the clip in a video editor. Romo did extend plays, often with rich rewards. He sure wasn't holding the ball here...that's a SLANDEROUS LIE. And I think you know it.
Yeah but it’s different eras…..Romos body wouldn’t have even held up in Rogers era.lets play..add together white and Staubach's #s
308tds -241 ints
Romo by himself 248tds lets just stop there 60 tds less then 2 starters used by Landry and white had more INts 100 less tds and Staubach 153-109 romo 248-117 lets stop it !!
Romo being severely underrated here as usual the knowitalls say otherwise
None of that makes any sense if you watched both play. Troy got off to slow starts compared to Romo.Well If Romo played then chances are we would have to come from behind.
I don't think Romo beats SF in the playoffs. Not playing the way he did. Now if he lets the running game lead then .Emmitt could have carried them. But there's no way he beats Steve Young in a shootout. But if he played the way Aikman did then people would say he wasn't that good. I wouldn't be one of them because you do what is best for the team. But it's no surprise because some want to compare Romo to HOF'ers.
No I don't believe that Tony was a choker at allFully agree. There's only one Roger. Forgive me if it appeared I was doing that. One thing I will do is keep trying to destroy this foolish notion all Romo did was choke.
I already told you I'm not buying the different ear garbage it's all in black and white I don't remember them in all the record books in the Hall of Fame when they're showing stats talking about when it used to be 12 games or 14 games or 16 games or now 17 games there's no* by it you played when you played but you're compared to everyone from the beginning of time. So it is clear that Tony Romo was not a person that threw a lot of interceptions if you look at how all his counterparts did that were supposed to be the greatest the Cowboys ever had people are discounting how great Tony Romo really was.. Don't say he couldn't have held up you don't know this I mean you want a time machine go back in time a healthy Romo see if you can hold up no I'm not buying any of that trash it is what it is the stats are clear people here are trying to say that Tony Romo was a choker and he threw too many interceptions and that Tom Landry wouldn't have put up with it yeah he had a player who was worse Danny white was not as good as Tony Romo even though he's compared to him sometimes no Tony Romo is more Brett farve than he is Danny white.. That's what I'm trying to convey to people don't discount what they've done now they're saying Prescott turns the ball over too much it's not true he had an off year but there are far worse years by players who played for us and for other teams that had just as big a names again Troy Aikman had 141 interceptions that's a lot I'm sorry he played on a Hall of Fame team with some of the best players and coaches ever and all he can muster is 165 that's downs and 141 interceptions think about the context of who he played with and he still threw a lot of interceptions if you're comparing them to Prescott and RomoYeah but it’s different eras…..Romos body wouldn’t have even held up in Rogers era.
It’s common sense. If his body can’t hold up in an era where they protect quarterbacks what makes you think he can hold up in the 70s? You think the game softened up back then?I already told you I'm not buying the different ear garbage it's all in black and white I don't remember them in all the record books in the Hall of Fame when they're showing stats talking about when it used to be 12 games or 14 games or 16 games or now 17 games there's no* by it you played when you played but you're compared to everyone from the beginning of time. So it is clear that Tony Romo was not a person that threw a lot of interceptions if you look at how all his counterparts did that were supposed to be the greatest the Cowboys ever had people are discounting how great Tony Romo really was.. Don't say he couldn't have held up you don't know this I mean you want a time machine go back in time a healthy Romo see if you can hold up no I'm not buying any of that trash it is what it is the stats are clear people here are trying to say that Tony Romo was a choker and he threw too many interceptions and that Tom Landry wouldn't have put up with it yeah he had a player who was worse Danny white was not as good as Tony Romo even though he's compared to him sometimes no Tony Romo is more Brett farve than he is Danny white.. That's what I'm trying to convey to people don't discount what they've done now they're saying Prescott turns the ball over too much it's not true he had an off year but there are far worse years by players who played for us and for other teams that had just as big a names again Troy Aikman had 141 interceptions that's a lot I'm sorry he played on a Hall of Fame team with some of the best players and coaches ever and all he can muster is 165 that's downs and 141 interceptions think about the context of who he played with and he still threw a lot of interceptions if you're comparing them to Prescott and Romo