No, what's "agenda driven" is you trying to compare the two as if they were equal.
They weren't close to equal. And again, I invite you to discuss that fact, free from tantrums and name-calling.
We can examine both rosters both coaches inherited.
I think what he is saying, history not withstanding, based on results.
both had bad teams.
both brought process to the fore front.
both lost in the playoffs.
neither got to the eventual goal.
so looking at results for the period, both were average.
Parcells had a history of winning prior to dallas.
are we comparing them for their work in dallas? or their entire career? if the latter, then there is no comparison....if the former, then results say they accomplished as much.
as for who had worse roster.... its an argument to be had...I am with you...parcells had worse roster....he had a great DC that he didn't realize and jettisoned.....so he can do 3-4