Which Head Coach that is available is better than Garrett right now?

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Did he inherit 1-7 team?

he will not admit to that. he has trouble admitting the truth...all he will say is we were 11-5 the year before and made the playoffs......he will keep repeating it until he wears you out...he can't handle the truth LOL

 

[G2]

Laugh your *** off about being completely wrong about it.

Typing something without actually knowing what you're talking about and the facts about it.

Lyao about your own ignorance.

What's "insulting" are *******es like you who type nonsense without actually knowing anything.

Quick! Make yet another stupid post while not knowing your facts.

Are you talking?

I'm thinking Wade would have an even worse winning percentage had he not gotten fired in the middle of his 1-7 season. I mean, he was stellar in Houston!

Clap!

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

His version of the truth. Take that however you will. Believe him or don't. But at least the guys isn't being a PC *****, or a liar.

that's exactly what he is a piece of shiet and a liar....

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Laugh your *** off about being completely wrong about it.

Typing something without actually knowing what you're talking about and the facts about it.

Lyao about your own ignorance.

What's "insulting" are *******es like you who type nonsense without actually knowing anything.

Quick! Make yet another stupid post while not knowing your facts.

listen to your own advice.....talking about something when you have no clue about it....ignoring facts...making up stuff...

then again if TO is your idol, why should we be surprised.

 

[Stash]

what does the year before have to do with 1-7?

the only relevant fact is the team was 1-7 and among the worst in the league....Wade lost that team. the defense was among the worst in the league...nothing else is relevant.

I think you have a lot of trouble handling the truth....you keep wanting to point to the past and ignore what's in front of you...right in front of you is 1-7?

The people trying to "ignore" anything are those trying to ignore what the team accomplished the year before. Because "oh, 1-7 makes Garrett look better than admitting the team he inherited actually had talent. So I'll "ignore" the year before and go with that!"

Don't try to project your own ignorance onto anyone else.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Pretty sure everyone acknowledged the 2009 season. But as I've been saying, he didn't take over that team. He took over the 1-7 2010 Cowboys.

come on, don't let facts get in the way of a good fantasy....you know 1-7 doesn't support his agenda...so he will keep pointing back to the year before....to the past, not the present of the time...

 

[Stash]

Are you talking?

I'm teaching. Based on your clear lack of knowledge on the subject that you chose to post about, you clearly needed it. You're welcome.

I'm thinking Wade would have an even worse winning percentage had he not gotten fired in the middle of his 1-7 season. I mean, he was stellar in Houston!

Clap!

And we all see where your "thinking" gets you. Not knowing what you're talking about.

Wins vs. losses.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Tell yourself whatever you need to about it. So you can feel better.

But where a team was the year before a coach takes over is most definitely "relevant" to any discussion about the job that coach has done and what they've accomplished, and specifically what they've had to overcome.

But Garrett excuse-makers try (and fail) to disregard it because it might paint their guy in a less favorable light.

Too bad.

I don't have to...seems like you do and everyone on this thread agrees....

you lack of logic falls apart at every corner...

all you have to do is say I don't like garrett, I hate garrett....and be done with it...then you try to justify it...and you look like a fool

and then nobody forced you to talk about conspiracy theories..you volunteered that on your own, then tried to justify it through some made up stories, irrelevant info....which made you look even a bigger fool that you are

 

[Stash]

listen to your own advice.....talking about something when you have no clue about it....ignoring facts...making up stuff...

then again if TO is your idol, why should we be surprised.

Show me where I was wrong. That'd be the guy who, like you, typed without knowing what he was talking about.

"Wins vs. losses."

You want to try to stalk me and have a real issue? We can do that.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Hall of Famer.

Let me know when Garrett gets fitted for his gold jacket.

HOF is for skills on the field...not character....TO is a piece of shiet....he will always be a piece of shiet....regardless of how many yards receiving..

you don't seem to know the difference....then again given your limited reasoning abilities, I am not surprised

 

[Stash]

I don't have to...seems like you do and everyone on this thread agrees....

you lack of logic falls apart at every corner...

all you have to do is say I don't like garrett, I hate garrett....and be done with it...then you try to justify it...and you look like a fool

and then nobody forced you to talk about conspiracy theories..you volunteered that on your own, then tried to justify it through some made up stories, irrelevant info....which made you look even a bigger fool that you are

The only person "looking like a fool" here is you. Chiming in on every post, despite claiming to have "no argument", co-signing every fact that someone else gets wrong, and then denying and ignoring your own falsehoods.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

The people trying to "ignore" anything are those trying to ignore what the team accomplished the year before. Because "oh, 1-7 makes Garrett look better than admitting the team he inherited actually had talent. So I'll "ignore" the year before and go with that!"

Don't try to project your own ignorance onto anyone else.

not ignoring the year before...you seem to desparatley trying to ignore 1-7 and dismiss it... so why take one and ignore the other...everyone on this thread including myself has acknowledged that we wer 11-5 the year before...but 1-7 when wade fired...

you keep wanting to ignore 1-7 and just hang on to 11-5....why? it supports your conspiracy agenda....totally ignoring the fact wade sucked.

 

[Stash]

HOF is for skills on the field...not character....TO is a piece of shiet....he will always be a piece of shiet....regardless of how many yards receiving..

you don't seem to know the difference....then again given your limited reasoning abilities, I am not surprised

Keep circumventing the language filter.

 

[Stash]

not ignoring the year before...you seem to desparatley trying to ignore 1-7 and dismiss it... so why take one and ignore the other...everyone on this thread including myself has acknowledged that we wer 11-5 the year before...but 1-7 when wade fired...

I've never ignored anything. I've acknowledged 1-7 at every turn. What I haven't done is what you want to do "selective history".

you keep wanting to ignore 1-7 and just hang on to 11-5....why? it supports your conspiracy agenda....totally ignoring the fact wade sucked.

I'm not "ignoring" Wade's own faults and failings.

But somehow, he never "sucked" enough to have a worse record in Dallas than the guy you're trying to defend? So who "sucks" worse then?

D'oh!

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

The only person "looking like a fool" here is you. Chiming in on every post, despite claiming to have "no argument", co-signing every fact that someone else gets wrong, and then denying and ignoring your own falsehoods.

wait...aren't you responding to everyone of my posts? what gives? you point fingers yet you are doing exactly the same thing? really!!! no really!!!!

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

I've never ignored anything. I've acknowledged 1-7 at every turn. What I haven't done is what you want to do "selective history".



I'm not "ignoring" Wade's own faults and failings.

But somehow, he never "sucked" enough to have a worse record in Dallas than the guy you're trying to defend? So who "sucks" worse then?

D'oh!

so now we are getting somewhere, that at 1-7 we were one of the worst teams in the league....so garrett inherited a 1-7 team....great to see you come around finally

I am not defending garrett.... I focus on facts.... that you choose to ignore

 

[G2]

Wade would be so much better here.

 

[Stash]

Wade would be so much better here.

Wade Phillips in Dallas - .607

Jason Garrett in Dallas - .558

You're right, Wade was, in fact, "better here."

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

It was the same team, the one that won 11 games and a playoff game the year before. As I said about a hundred times, but again some people can't handle that fact and would try to deceive by separating things. Those people fail.

why is that relevant to 2010? what it actually proves is that, wade totally screwed up a playoff capable team he had inherited from parcells and we very quickly went down a slippery slope.....to 1-7. three years of incompetence caught up with him and the team quit on him...well, actually the defense did more than anything else

 

[G2]

Wade Phillips in Dallas - .607

Jason Garrett in Dallas - .558

You're right, Wade was, in fact, "better here."

No doubt, you're right about percentage. But I can't figure out why you have such a boner for Wade. The end of his HC days were horrible.
1-7? Ouch.