Who is in to... Photography?

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Well, I'll definitely do RAW from now on. I'll just have to buy bigger SD cards if need be.
 

CliffnDallas

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,484
Reaction score
215
kitten_love.jpg
 

CowboysFan02

Degree or Bust
Messages
810
Reaction score
0
CliffnMesquite;2568862 said:
That's a great shot. How long was the shutter open?

It was open for 0.013 sec.(1/80), sort wish I had thought about at the time and tried the same shot with a flash too to light up the foreground.
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,487
Reaction score
12,235
vta;2571664 said:
Yeah. JPG is a compression format and shouldn't be used if you're going to do anything further with the image. It's basically an end product for something that will not be edited again and most definitely never be sized up.

With Camera RAW, you have plenty of options and it's most important in your conversion from the start. You do need Photoshop, though, with the CR plug-in, which is free. When you open it in Photoshop, you're presented with the Camera Raw window and all the settings...

camera-raw.jpg


There you set the Max resolution and image and color correction, sharpness, etc.

Like I said earlier, a lot of the consumer Digital SLR's are not full frame (the digital equivalent of 35mm), so printing big won't be perfect, but you can get some very good stuff from them, using Camera Raw. Your particular camera can definitely get you nice prints at that size you mentioned.

Just don't do it from a JPG. :)

Also, RAW is not an end Format either.
You'll have to save the file as something else when you're done. Tif, Photoshop, or final JPG. I know space is an issue, so you'll have to consider you'll have two files of the same image: the RAW, (digital negative) and the processed file.

We have done high quality large prints using JPG with no problems at all.
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,487
Reaction score
12,235
c0wb0y_m0nkey;2571898 said:
Yeah, that is a great one. Is that a single exposure or some sort of HDR?

I think she did something to it, but I'm not sure if it was one she did HDR. Looks like maybe it was just Sepia added.

I believe this is the original (except for the text of course.):
http://i44.***BLOCKED***/albums/f20/alphie06/hcfrontpostcard1.jpg

And another of the same building:
http://i44.***BLOCKED***/albums/f20/alphie06/hccorner1.jpg
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
Thought I'd bump this bad boy....just got a Nikon D90. Pretty stoked so far. Tough call between that and the Canon 50D, but the addition of HD video, a user friendlier flash, and a lower cost prevailed.

I'd love to here more about RAW formatting. I no longer have CS or Photoshop...is there any other way to work with it at home or directly on the camera (I obviously haven't finished reading the manual)? Or is RAW something I should use when I'm planning on taking shots to a pro for larger display?

Anyway...I'd love to see some more shots added to this thread.
 

vta

The Proletariat
Messages
8,753
Reaction score
11
tomson75;3499546 said:
Thought I'd bump this bad boy....just got a Nikon D90. Pretty stoked so far. Tough call between that and the Canon 50D, but the addition of HD video, a user friendlier flash, and a lower cost prevailed.

I'd love to here more about RAW formatting. I no longer have CS or Photoshop...is there any other way to work with it at home or directly on the camera (I obviously haven't finished reading the manual)? Or is RAW something I should use when I'm planning on taking shots to a pro for larger display?

Anyway...I'd love to see some more shots added to this thread.

Congrats on the new camera.

I'm not sure about the D90, but on the D700 you have some rudimentary editing tools, like color correction, temperature, crop, etc, but nothing like the control of editing in RAW. RAW is for finer control over the image before any kind of compression. It's like modern day film processing where you can effect the exposure, contrast, etc, in the processing stage. You can correct a wrong White Balance and saturation as well.

The files are much larger than JPG'S, so storage and Flash Card size are a concern. You can get good prints from a JPG and that's usually the final file size you can hand off to a printer, it's just better off being the final and not the format for work in progress.

It takes tons of space, but I keep everything, from RAW, to edited Photoshop documents, to final JPGS.

You can use Nikon Capture NX 2 for RAW processing. It's a lot cheaper than Photoshop @ $179.00. I've never used it, so I can't vouch for it, but it's a place to start looking and hunt up reviews.

Happy shooting.

45232_1510160229906_1111366134_31503716_1799376_n.jpg


40938_1507962174956_1111366134_31497376_1338621_n.jpg
 

cowboyblue31

Active Member
Messages
388
Reaction score
33
tomson75;3499546 said:
Thought I'd bump this bad boy....just got a Nikon D90. Pretty stoked so far. Tough call between that and the Canon 50D, but the addition of HD video, a user friendlier flash, and a lower cost prevailed.

I'd love to here more about RAW formatting. I no longer have CS or Photoshop...is there any other way to work with it at home or directly on the camera (I obviously haven't finished reading the manual)? Or is RAW something I should use when I'm planning on taking shots to a pro for larger display?

Anyway...I'd love to see some more shots added to this thread.

I picked up the Canon 50D back in May and I love it. Looked at the Nikon d90 also, but I have always shot canon, so I went with the 50D.

Here is a link to my blog. I just put it up last week.

www.flashburnphotography-joe.blogspot.com
 

kmp77

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,276
Reaction score
370
I had a Nikon D90 and sold it to get a Canon T2i. The canon's HD video is FAR superior. The D90's was pretty useless.

Here's my first test with it using fake tilt shift:

[youtubehd]Eqm5WTOAM0A[/youtubehd]
 

Meat-O-Rama

Vegetarians are so stupid.
Messages
2,615
Reaction score
614
kmp77;3499698 said:
I had a Nikon D90 and sold it to get a Canon T2i. The canon's HD video is FAR superior. The D90's was pretty useless.

Here's my first test with it using fake tilt shift:

[youtubehd]Eqm5WTOAM0A[/youtubehd]


That's awesome, how'd you do the fake tilt shift?
 

Chief

"Friggin Joke Monkey"
Messages
8,543
Reaction score
4
An old thread resurrected. Since I first posted in it, I've upgraded to a Canon EOS Rebel XS.

So many great photos on here. I really like the first black-and-white that theo posted, as well as the waterfall by Cowboysfan02, and the shot of the dog in front of the blue wall with the window by ethiostar. Too many good photos to list them all.
 

kmp77

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,276
Reaction score
370
c0wb0y_m0nkey;3499742 said:
That's awesome, how'd you do the fake tilt shift?

After Effects. Just layer the video on top of one another and set masks and blurs to create a shallow DOF effect. Then you just mess with the speed and frame rate.
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,487
Reaction score
12,235
kmp77;3499698 said:
I had a Nikon D90 and sold it to get a Canon T2i. The canon's HD video is FAR superior. The D90's was pretty useless.

Really? My wife and I have been able to do some pretty good things with the video on her D90. The only thing I'm not fond of is the audio, but that's not really a big concern.

We also refuse to buy Canon's for various reasons.


As for my wife, she is going to be having her first gallery showing soon. She made up a portfolio and took it around to some galleries (or one gallery actually) and they reserved a spot for her probably next month if we can get it ready by then.
 

kmp77

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,276
Reaction score
370
ChldsPlay;3499994 said:
Really? My wife and I have been able to do some pretty good things with the video on her D90. The only thing I'm not fond of is the audio, but that's not really a big concern.

We also refuse to buy Canon's for various reasons.


As for my wife, she is going to be having her first gallery showing soon. She made up a portfolio and took it around to some galleries (or one gallery actually) and they reserved a spot for her probably next month if we can get it ready by then.

D90 doesn't capture real 720p video..I think its 800px and removes every other pixel to get to 720 so there's a stair stepping that's going on. The quality isn't anywhere near the canon's either.
 

ologan

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,184
Reaction score
604
Chief;3499745 said:
An old thread resurrected. Since I first posted in it, I've upgraded to a Canon EOS Rebel XS.

So many great photos on here. I really like the first black-and-white that theo posted, as well as the waterfall by Cowboysfan02, and the shot of the dog in front of the blue wall with the window by ethiostar. Too many good photos to list them all.

Great camera. I got my XSi last Christmas and haven't stopped taking pics yet. Still learning, and have my sights set on a Canon "L" 35mm lens as a wide angle addition to my bag. I can't wait for Fall colors up here in the mountains.

http://i232.***BLOCKED***/albums/ee264/ologan/th_sunflower.jpg

http://i232.***BLOCKED***/albums/ee264/ologan/th_bodines4.jpg

http://i232.***BLOCKED***/albums/ee264/ologan/th_july2010c.jpg
 

casmith07

Attorney-at-Zone
Messages
31,538
Reaction score
9,312
I have a Canon T1i and I absolutely love it. I haven't had a chance to test the video out like I want to...my telephoto lens only goes to 250mm and I want something that I can get closer with...but the prices are ridonkulous for those lenses.

I only shoot in RAW. I definitely want to get a tripod so I can take advantage of slower shutter speeds.

Tony Dorsett's cleats at the Pro Football Hall of Fame

40914_569691566490_11900159_32704975_5214087_n.jpg


Silhouetted bodies with old helmets...some idiot stepped into the right side of my frame and it threw the light off a little.

40298_569691501620_11900159_32704973_4787409_n.jpg


The Fedora

39034_569692250120_11900159_32705006_390589_n.jpg


38555_569692260100_11900159_32705007_4063367_n.jpg
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
kmp77;3500196 said:
D90 doesn't capture real 720p video..I think its 800px and removes every other pixel to get to 720 so there's a stair stepping that's going on. The quality isn't anywhere near the canon's either.

Personally, I'd rather have the better camera and opt for a separate video camera. Shooting HD movies on a DSLR is nice, and a real consideration for choosing a camera with that option, but to make it the deciding factor seems pretty damn silly to me.

Either choice is pretty damn good though. Apples and Oranges.
 

SaltwaterServr

Blank Paper Offends Me
Messages
8,124
Reaction score
1
I shoot an older Fuji S3 Pro that will get upgraded to a pro-sumer Nikon one of these days. My best work isn't available for display for model disclosure reasons.

My first ever "photograph".

n650163136_497701_7764.jpg


n650163136_497709_9811.jpg


For the ladies. The clothing store wanted these done a very specific way, hence the odd post processing. Damn club was firing a strobe the entire time and screwed up myself and the other photographer.

n650163136_668174_609.jpg


n650163136_668189_5155.jpg


n650163136_997082_3723.jpg


4789_108778343136_650163136_2171551_8278376_n.jpg


4789_108778168136_650163136_2171547_2697919_n.jpg


n650163136_201644_1539.jpg


n650163136_201640_1660.jpg


n650163136_201637_853.jpg
 
Top