Who is the Leak?

[dadymat]

Hopefully it was Carpenter, since he'll be gone soon anyway.

But really, I don't care who the leak was. This whole thing is like blaming the snitch more than the criminal anyway. If this crap hadn't been going on, there wouldn't have been a worry about it leaking to the press in the first place.

exactly..........yes having a mole is a problem..but the real problem is that what the mole is saying is true

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

exactly..........yes having a mole is a problem..but the real problem is that what the mole is saying is true

And you can never know that because the mole hides in anonymity. They can say whatever garbage they want, ESPN will go along with it and they have zero accountability.

I know Witten is more concerned about that guy then he is TO. That tells me something at the very least. Friends, coworkers and teammates fight and that is just how things are. Stabbing your teammates in the back which is what this is is something entirely different.

 

[dadymat]

And you can never know that because the mole hides in anonymity. They can say whatever garbage they want, ESPN will go along with it and they have zero accountability.

I know Witten is more concerned about that guy then he is TO. That tells me something at the very least. Friends, coworkers and teammates fight and that is just how things are. Stabbing your teammates in the back which is what this is is something entirely different.

can you name any media outlet that names their sources?....that isnt how the press works.....they dont just print everything anyone tells them they have people they trust giving them info....and they usually end up being correct....but of course no one talks about when the media is right they just want to nit pic small details about stories they dont agree with....

now like I said...having a mole is a huge problem....but some are using the mole to distract from the real problems

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

can you name any media outlet that names their sources?....that isnt how the press works.....they dont just print everything anyone tells them they have people they trust giving them info....and they usually end up being correct....but of course no one talks about when the media is right they just want to nit pic small details about stories they dont agree with....

now like I said...having a mole is a huge problem....but some are using the mole to distract from the real problems

Every single one of the and quite frankly you have no credibility to talk on the subject after that remark.

Also if you think that TO and Witten fighting is a bigger issue than a teammate going to the media and making a giant poostorm about it then you are clueless. Have you ever worked with anyone and argued with them? Have you ever gone to a different company with which they work and talked badly about them anonymously behind their back?

Its like saying that Bennett making that video was worse than him posting it on youtube.

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

The two biggest talkers. Or rather, one of them. Ellis or Crayfish.

 

[JohnnyHopkins]

The two biggest talkers. Or rather, one of them. Ellis or Crayfish.

Eliminate Ellis. If it was him, the report would have included a blurb about how Greg Ellis was unhappy about something as a side note.

 

[TellerMorrow34]

My guess is...Sam Hurd.

Pissed off at his bad luck, and everyone getting the ball more than he ever will, he's crossed over to the Dark Side of The Force and he's feeding the evil lackey of The Empire, Ed "I Suck At Life" Werder anything he can.

 

[dadymat]

Every single one of the and quite frankly you have no credibility to talk on the subject after that remark.

Also if you think that TO and Witten fighting is a bigger issue than a teammate going to the media and making a giant poostorm about it then you are clueless. Have you ever worked with anyone and argued with them? Have you ever gone to a different company with which they work and talked badly about them anonymously behind their back?

Its like saying that Bennett making that video was worse than him posting it on youtube.

well that was a quick easy response with zero information...if EVERY single one of them did we wouldnt be having this argument....well, you might because i think that you would try and argue with a wall to try and prove another one of your ridiculous stances.....


talk about clueless....i never said anything like that

it was worse , cause if he wouldnt have been stupid enough to make it there never would be a chance of it being on youtube......what if his buddy put it up without his knowledge?...by making the video he put himself in this position ...


now i will be eagerly await another one of your responses that offer no other information other than ..im stupid, clueless,and not worth argueing with

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

exactly..........yes having a mole is a problem..but the real problem is that what the mole is saying is true

Yes you did say that,

well that was a quick easy response with zero information...if EVERY single one of them did we wouldnt be having this argument....well, you might because i think that you would try and argue with a wall to try and prove another one of your ridiculous stances.....

Maybe if you learned to express yourself in a manner that actually said what you mean then you would have a point. All media reveals their sources. When they say 'according to Jerry Jones' or 'Rosenthal said today' they are revealing their sources.

What you mean is they do not reveal their sources who wish to remain anonymous. that completely depends. In sports journalism you would for the most part be correct because ethics plays a very limited role. Other branches not so much. They all do if ordered by the court unless they want to go to jail.

This is neither here not here at the end of the day. It doesn't matter whether or not they reveal their sources. I personally despise them as a matter of course. The issue is that the leak in and of themselves is the one that is hiding. Thus there is really no way for us to judge. If its Ware saying it that is one thing. If its Greg Ellis or Pat Crayton its something else entirely.

talk about clueless....i never said anything like that

See the above bolded portion. Do you even know what Werder was reporting?

it was worse , cause if he wouldnt have been stupid enough to make it there never would be a chance of it being on youtube......what if his buddy put it up without his knowledge?...by making the video he put himself in this position ...


now i will be eagerly await another one of your responses that offer no other information other than ..im stupid, clueless,and not worth argueing with

Well if the shoe fits..... And at the end of the day you and I have a different view of privacy than I do. If Marty wants to sit at his house when not at work and make tapes bashing whitey and watch homemade tapes of it all day long. That his right and privacy. A man's home is his castle.

 

[DallasEast]

http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/usualsuspects.jpg​

 

[dadymat]

Yes you did say that,



Maybe if you learned to express yourself in a manner that actually said what you mean then you would have a point. All media reveals their sources. When they say 'according to Jerry Jones' or 'Rosenthal said today' they are revealing their sources.

What you mean is they do not reveal their sources who wish to remain anonymous. that completely depends. In sports journalism you would for the most part be correct because ethics plays a very limited role. Other branches not so much. They all do if ordered by the court unless they want to go to jail.

This is neither here not here at the end of the day. It doesn't matter whether or not they reveal their sources. I personally despise them as a matter of course. The issue is that the leak in and of themselves is the one that is hiding. Thus there is really no way for us to judge. If its Ware saying it that is one thing. If its Greg Ellis or Pat Crayton its something else entirely.




See the above bolded portion. Do you even know what Werder was reporting?








Well if the shoe fits..... And at the end of the day you and I have a different view of privacy than I do. If Marty wants to sit at his house when not at work and make tapes bashing whitey and watch homemade tapes of it all day long. That his right and privacy. A man's home is his castle.

if they all name there sources the court wouldnt have to order it? if the court ordered Werder to name his source im sure he would as well......and wasnt it you telling me the other day not to ever, ever, ever try to assume to know what you meant more than you do?..take your own advise there...

so right or wrong doesnt matter....youll just argue your agenda?

yes i know what Werder reported...that the WRs went to Garrett complaining about their lack of involvement because Romo was overlooking them and locking on to Witten...amongst other locker room turmoil.....so my point is that the fact that there is locker room problems is more the issue than the person who told Werder that there is problems....... not just that TO and Witten had a fight.....


tell that to Pam and Tommy Lee.....if he is gonna do that wearing a Cowboys helmet and saying the things he did ..knowing it could leak out somehow or another is irresponsible.....