Kevinicus
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,891
- Reaction score
- 12,673
Because that happened oh so many times...Or a game ending pick 6.
Because that happened oh so many times...Or a game ending pick 6.
WhTs his record in the six games without Zeke? Zeke is also undefeated vs the Eagles.Besides Brady, Dak is the most winningest QB since he's been in the league. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, haters.
Easy answer. Polarization. And ego.Dak went 24-28 and played a very gutsy game. He ran the offense to a 37-23 minute time advantage over NO’s. He fumbled twice when his pass blocking broke down almost immediately. Just about every QB would have fumbled in the same situations. In the 2nd half the pass blocking was atrocious, but do ANY of the haters bring up the poor pass blocking! Hel_ no!!! Dak, helped win this game regardless of what the haters think.
All QB's have contingencies. Since Brady needs a great OL and a very specific type of O, that means he's terrible? Rodgers only won when he had a top 5 D.I think Dak is good enough to win with a stud RB and a stud O-line. Throw in a stud defense and we should be fine but QBs shouldn't have contingencies.
You said because he had a great defense...as if they carried him. As if they were great the entire time he played and he didn't do anything.
Now I know how you "know" what you know.
Philly beat ATL 15-10 in the first round of the playoffs last year.All that 'as if' stuff....you're making it up.
I don't think our defense is carrying Dak, for that matter, either. I do think there are games in the NFL where you need to rely on your defense if you're going to qualify for playoffs and then advance.
He made great throws in the first half and played really well. Not so much in the second half. But he has heart. He just isn't talented enough as a passer to help us win a championship. That is why most of us "hate him".
I WANT him to play amazing all the time, but he's very very inconsistent and below average in a few very important areas. It's not like we rag on him for no reason.
I wasn't speaking about winning, I was speaking on the level of play from the QB. You can have a great game as a QB and still lose if the team is weak. (See Romo's career)All QB's have contingencies. Since Brady needs a great OL and a very specific type of O, that means he's terrible? Rodgers only won when he had a top 5 D.
QB's don't win super bowls w/ terrible teams. Ever.
That can happen if you're forced to carry the team on your back.Or a game ending pick 6.
All that 'as if' stuff....you're making it up.
I don't think our defense is carrying Dak, for that matter, either. I do think there are games in the NFL where you need to rely on your defense if you're going to qualify for playoffs and then advance.
The protection didn’t break down immediately. He had time to get rid of the ball in at least three of them. He held the ball like he does three times every game. He even admitted as much this year.Easy answer. Polarization. And ego.
I never thought Foles could lead any team to a SB. lolI know he’s playing well.
My comment on Foles is that he’s not a very good QB but he managed to win a championship with a great defense behind him. It’s nit that difficult to understand, I wouldn’t think.
I call them Roaches.Dak went 24-28 and played a very gutsy game. He ran the offense to a 37-23 minute time advantage over NO’s. He fumbled twice when his pass blocking broke down almost immediately. Just about every QB would have fumbled in the same situations. In the 2nd half the pass blocking was atrocious, but do ANY of the haters bring up the poor pass blocking! Hel_ no!!! Dak, helped win this game regardless of what the haters think.
What does "because" mean?
Because means "they wouldn't have gotten past Atlanta, who had the ball first and ten inside the 15 and went four-and-out.
Zeke and the defense carried the team.Because means "they wouldn't have gotten past Atlanta, who had the ball first and ten inside the 15 and went four-and-out.
That doesn't mean the defense 'carried' the QB in the post season. It does mean there are games the team would not have gotten past without being able to rely on one, the other, or both the defense and the QB.