glimmerman
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 30,043
- Reaction score
- 29,902
how about the egirls games...We beat a team beaten all year that had every incentive to throw the game for a higher draft position. This is not the game to try to sell Dak with.
how about the egirls games...We beat a team beaten all year that had every incentive to throw the game for a higher draft position. This is not the game to try to sell Dak with.
I think were going to see this team get slowly neutered if Dak gets top 5 money.I really don’t care about your questions. They had nothing to do with my post. It’s a lame attempt to deter my narrative.
I guess you forgot that Smith and Martin were still Pro Bowlers last year. And we saw how ineffective Dakster is without WR1.
That’s my point. We’ve already seen what he is without this Pro Bowl talent around him.
Imagine our offense with Dak without Elliott , Cooper and any part of our Pro Bowl OL. That’s what we’ll be left with eventually if we pay Dakster Top 5 money.
This is hilarious, but it's my fault for not being specific. I meant "post-injury". This escapability video of Wentz is from before he got injured. Show me any video of Wentz being able to escape after his knee and back injuries. I bet you can't. ...... Yet, Wentz got a new expensive $32 mil/season contract extension based on what he could do pre-injuries?
Good luck with that.
Our window will be closing fast if we pay him Top 5 money. It happens to teams with more prolific QB’s than Dakster.I think were going to see this team get slowly neutered if Dak gets top 5 money.
(In bold^^^) You mean like how Dak led the team to a hard fought victory against all of the Giants starters during Week 17 this past season? You mean how Dak has a winning record without Zeke playing due to suspension? You mean you refuse to answer my questions because you'll expose your agenda and misinformation?I really don’t care about your questions. They had nothing to do with my post. It’s a lame attempt to deter my narrative.
I guess you forgot that Smith and Martin were still Pro Bowlers last year. And we saw how ineffective Dakster is without WR1.
That’s my point. We’ve already seen what he is without this Pro Bowl talent around him.
In 2 years it may not even be top 10 money.Our window will be closing fast if we pay him Top 5 money. It happens to teams with more prolific QB’s than Dakster.
And why a Team Friendly deal is so critical.
Fact check: We were 3-3 during Elliott suspension.(In bold^^^) You mean like how Dak led the team to a hard fought victory against all of the Giants starters during Week 17 this past season? You mean how Dak has a winning record without Zeke playing due to suspension? You mean you refuse to answer my questions because you'll expose your agenda and misinformation?
Dak had a lot of help? Like who? Name them.
Like Wentz has by being surrounded by a Super Bowl caliber and proven team?
Week 17 Giants game last season. Zeke did not play. That's another win Dak piled up without him.Fact check: We were 3-3 during Elliott suspension.
You really need to get your facts right before you step up to the plate with me.
Romo says hi, HE. I see that Dak haterade is nice and salty.
Doesn’t matter. It’s always about where the deal is now. If he signs a Top 5 deal. They aren’t going to be saying it won’t be in a couple years. LolIn 2 years it may not even be top 10 money.
You said under suspension.Week 17 Giants game last season. Zeke did not play. That's another win Dak piled up without him.
It's becoming embarrassing exposing you Greg.
The implication was having to play without Zeke.You said under suspension.
Details details. All I can go by is what’s typed .The implication was having to play without Zeke.
Probably not but we can certainly argue he should be. And what the effects could be.The only reason Prescott "deserves" to be one the NFL's highest paid QBs is the climate.
QBs are not paid on equal grounds in terms of their overall value. Some are overpaid, all are paid at a base level because of the scarcity of talent.
That said, sitting here and debating about his "value" is such a complete waste of time.
He is not going to paid to his "value". Few QBs are.
Doesn’t matter. It’s always about where the deal is now. If he signs a Top 5 deal. They aren’t going to be saying it won’t be in a couple years. Lol
I am not following you.Probably not but we can certainly argue he should be. And what the effects could be.
Those would be included with effects. Mostly negative.I am not following you.
The "should be" is a given mainly because of how things work, not how things are.
On a tangible level, no, he should not be paid among the game's best. But he will be because the climate.
I have no idea what you are talking about in terms of effects. Prescott getting paid more only has negative effects, not positive ones.