Dez was starter material at Oklahoma State too. Most players, besides Matt Cassel, were starter material in college, so I'm not sure what that has to do with anything. Randle looked good every time he touched the ball last year and there were times that he should have went in for Murray, but Murray refused to get off the field, so I'm not sure why you're so quick to dismiss him.
Interesting. We'll find out this summer.Unpopular opinion alert: he's probably the best back we have.
Unpopular opinion alert: he's probably the best back we have.
I think he could actually be very good, but my concern is his maturity level and how he holds up to being an every down back. I mean How's his pass protection? Can he wear down a defense?
He may just be a nice change of pace back, but honestly I was clamoring for more use of him last year. He saw the field really well and took advantage of the holes the offense opened up. He finds a seam and he gets more out of it than any back we had last year.
Doesn't mean he's an every down back though.
It means I don't think he can handle the rigor of being an nfl back. You compare randle to Dez and Murray....please...
You could have said the same thing about Murray coming out of school. Saying that he can't handle the rigors of being an NFL back with his scatback style and injury history.
Randle doesn't have near the injury history that Murray had. What makes you think he can't handle the rigors?
The most glaring issue that nobody is really talking about is this. He's absolutely pathetic at pass protection. He looks like a pop warner kid trying to block an NFL player. You just can't take him out every time there is a pass play called. I want Romo to play at least 2-3 more years. That won't happen if we are expecting Randle to pick up a blitz from any NFL LB.
He should be in the mix. He was good in 2014. I thought they should have given him a few more carries.With all the talk about drafting a running back high, and the possibilty of trading for AD, why is it that Randle isnt starter material? at worst we could form a rbbc between him McFadden and Williams... do we absolutely have to a one bell cow type of back?
Randle will be in his 3rd year, so we have had time to develop and bring him along, last year he should some flashes with the limited opprotunities he had.
I see McFadden as a CJ Spiller type, good change of pace back. possible KR also
Williams, I'm not sure what he is, the FO seems to really like him, probably a good compliment to the other backs.
Randles TD against Chicago might've been the best run I saw all year last year.
He's in the mix as all the running backs. But if we get a back in round 1 or 2, pretty sure 'Boys want him to start.
I dont think Peterson going to be a boy unless the Vikes release him out right and he takes a massive pay cut to play for his dream team, we'll see if that happens. If it does, I'm all for bringing him in on a contract that does not hurt the boys if he doesn't pan out. We can add him toi the mix and see what we end up with. Peterson and McFadden would be an awesome one two punch in the ground game. Add Gurly to the mix and WHOA! that could be deadly. Maybe Romo only throws the ball 5 times all year.
As far as Randle, he wasn't a first tier running back cause we had Murray, who was. He will get his shot this training camp and preseason, if he cuts the mustard he will see plenty of action. Personally I am excited about McFadden, Randle, Williams and Dunbar, three of these four should be good enough for a great RB corp and a positive ground game.
But Randles off the field issues continue to plague him and hurt his chances. Hes got a lot more to overcome than any other back we have or would draft.