Aikman- 3 SB wins, Dak- 0 SB's which is where this started. Why aren't you blaming Emmitt for not rushing for 100 yards and winning 5 in a row? This is dumb, and I'm through.Troy Aikman record 94-71.
Emmit Smith record 63-19 when rushing for 100+ yards.
Not hard to do the math and see how well Boy Wonder played without Emmit eclipsing 100 yards.
I would be as well.Aikman- 3 SB wins, Dak- 0 SB's which is where this started. Why aren't you blaming Emmitt for not rushing for 100 yards and winning 5 in a row? This is dumb, and I'm through.
The 92 team was probably the best team ever assembled. The team got progressive worse both in talent and coaching each year that went by. The only reason they won in 95 was because of Deion.When you play on the best team ever assembled, he should have won 5.
94 lost to SF 38-28. Aikman 3 picks. Guess what happened this game. We ran for less than 100 yards.
96 lost to Carolina 26-17. Aikman 3 picks. Guess what happened this game. We ran for less than 100 yards.
Let that sink in for a bit.
If you would like I can tell you how many yards we ran for when we won 3 SB's.
See here is the problem for the Cowboys.Why not just start Lance? Well, the six guys on here would ruin every thread with hot takes like this, "dak would have scored 30 points in that win. dak didn't get a good offensive line, dak didn't have a good runner like that. The defense did play hard like that for dak. The coaches didn't dumb the offense down enough for dak." blah blah, blah..
yeah, dak is better than Troy or Roger. I think he's the best. If I were him, I'd go ahead and retire and go into the hall. go dakieI would be as well.
Dak gets the blame with no run game or run defense. Troy is considered a God with the all time NFL leading rusher and arguably the best team money could buy and was ever assembled.
But when he plays bad and gets us knocked out of the playoffs, twice for throwing 3 picks, it does not count. It was his fault we did not win 5 in a row.
Dak Haters....loser's mentalityDak is gone, the writing is on the wall and before you say he gives us the best chance to win this year, I agree, he is going to win more meaningless regular season games and if this team is fortunate to make the playoffs he isn't going to take us to a superbowl, that's not going to happen with this current team regardless and I think most everyone agrees with that take.
So starting Dak net's you nothing and actually hurts the 25 draft stock. Give Lance a true year of evaluation, the worst that can happen is the team goes 0-17 has the top pick or top five pick and free of Dak's cap hit. Or start Dak, win a few games, know nothing about Lance's ability and end up with a middle to late round first.
So if we failed to rush for 100 in those games, using your logic, why isn't the blame on Emmitt?When you play on the best team ever assembled, he should have won 5.
94 lost to SF 38-28. Aikman 3 picks. Guess what happened this game. We ran for less than 100 yards.
96 lost to Carolina 26-17. Aikman 3 picks. Guess what happened this game. We ran for less than 100 yards.
Let that sink in for a bit.
If you would like I can tell you how many yards we ran for when we won 3 SB's.
we want jason prescott, or dak garrett.We Want Lance...We Want Lance!!!
Jerry is not going to pay Dak $50 million to sit on the bench. He could trade Cee Dee for a 1st round though before paying him $30 mill a season.Dak is gone, the writing is on the wall and before you say he gives us the best chance to win this year, I agree, he is going to win more meaningless regular season games and if this team is fortunate to make the playoffs he isn't going to take us to a superbowl, that's not going to happen with this current team regardless and I think most everyone agrees with that take.
So starting Dak net's you nothing and actually hurts the 25 draft stock. Give Lance a true year of evaluation, the worst that can happen is the team goes 0-17 has the top pick or top five pick and free of Dak's cap hit. Or start Dak, win a few games, know nothing about Lance's ability and end up with a middle to late round first.
Mahomes just wont a SB with a rookie as his biggest weapon. Dak needs 6 all pros to even have a glimmer of hope. How over Dak I am is crazy. Dude is so average it's scary.A few weeks ago I would have wholeheartedly disagreed with that thought, but at this point I'm not sure how they don't go this route? The Cowboys approach of asking Dak to win with less is not good for either party. If he's not coming back in 2025 it really is best to cut ties now, see what if anything you have in Lance now, and go from there. If they are not actively trying to improve the roster there is no sense in giving Dak a talent starved offense to win 8 games instead of 6 with.
Funny how multiple people were blaming Dak for his record when we don't run for 100+ yards. However it is the same for Troy if not worse.So if we failed to rush for 100 in those games, using your logic, why isn't the blame on Emmitt?
Tons of video on Lance. 8)See here is the problem for the Cowboys.
It is very possible that Lance is better than Dak and would win more game, maybe even playoff games.
However..........
There is a chance that Lance is worse than Dak, like really worse. There might be a reason Shanny decided to throw 3 first round picks in the crapper and trade Lance for a bag of Doritos.
Lets say its 50/50..........Lance is better than Dak/Lance is worse than Dak..............do you think Jerry is willing to take that risk?
From where? He played 1 season. In his entire life.Tons of video on Lance. 8)
The videos were so bad the 49ers decided to dump him..Tons of video on Lance. 8)