No hindsight, its reality. Henry wouldnt of overcome the defensive woes and Dak's composure vrs GB. Yes that was the year to go All-In, but a 1st for Henry is a high price, especially as in hindsight it would of failed.
This year, if you believe the All-In claim, that's on you. Henry was never coming to us in the offseason, why would he when Baltimore was interested? I love the way you create a ficticious narrative where he accepts the 3rd year.
reality? how did you know in summer that this is what's about to happen? that we would have defensive woes?
in the offseason, it was painfully obvious we needed to replenish the running game, address holes on DL and go into draft prepared, not needy.
a well run organization, keen on winning championships would have made the moves.
but now, 14 games in, everybody says, it was the right thing to do....which is hindsight...oh, the defense is bad....but how did you know? this was a top 5 defense last year, sorely missing a DT in the middle. did you know they were going to collapse like this? show me your post from this off season where you predicated this defense was going to be this bad.
I never believed in the all in....it was a lie,
but if all in, then show me....then sign henry, sign one of the better DTs. when those two things didn't happen, it was painfully obvious....
I haven't believe Jerry in 30 years, who is the root cause of all of this.
we never pursued Henry, so we will never know if he would have, or would not have, but he was from Texas and did mention
Dallas never even called him....just a call.
not fictious...reality....if owner/GM would have pursued Henry and a DT, then he would show commitment which he did neither. then the team would be improved in off season, based on where they finished last season.
and now go ahead and do your dak dak dak thing. because that's all there is always on some of you all's mind.
oh, btw, when you are done with you crystal ball, pleae pass it along