_sturt_
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,398
- Reaction score
- 4,304
Sorry for my broad use of the term... I didn't actually consider what I wrote to be an "insult." Rather, I should have said "challenge."insult
Yes, what you said deserved challenge, which is why I chose to respond.
It's okay. It's what we do here. It's sometimes called an internet sports "forum" just for that reason, of course.
And now, you go a little further and put a flag in the ground on the assertion that CW "has supposedly even made comments of having no strong desire to ever come back"... ???
I mean... okay... if that's your standard for assessing what to believe, that's pretty much all I need to know. No need to continue any dialogue as-if to try to discover common ground.
I will only end my part in our dance by saying it did not go unnoticed that you avoided a second time acknowledging the thrust of the working theory. Which, is icing on that cake... welcome to whatever last word you would like to offer, but I'm left to conclude that disingenuous engagement might be a theme of your posts if ever I come across one of yours again in the future.