mldardy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,614
- Reaction score
- 7,310
Glad we agree on this.
We don't.
Glad we agree on this.
They've officially stated this will be a new Batman that is recast.
As long as they don't cast Ryan Gosling, I'm okay with that. Ironically, the only two actors I'll miss the most in a recast are Michael Caine's Alfred and Morgan Freeman's Fox.
I saw Idris Elba's name somewhere and I think he'd be a great, great Batman. I'm also pretty sure there would be riots in the streets if he were to get the part.
This shows one of the many key differences between Marvel and DC. Marvel changes with the times, DC is stuck in the 50's.I always thought it was stupid that nobody could figure it out.
Ugh. You've got to be joking.Bring back Michael Keaton if Batman needs to be older.
If they got a good writer, like Frank Miller, to put together a story, it would be a good movie. Unfortunately, however, I have no doubt whatsoever it will be a typical lame misunderstanding that leads the heroes to fight each other in the first half of the movie before teaming up to defeat the real enemy in the 2nd half.http://variety.com/2013/film/news/superman-and-batman-movie-comic-con-1200565858/
Justice League movie in 2017.
No word on who will play Batman. But Snyder is directing with Nolan producing.
That's probably the top reason why a Justice League movie would be an abysmal failure. DC's problem is that their most popular character, Batman, simply could never plausibly exist in the same arena as Superman. Then throw in another ridiculously overpowered character like Green Lantern, and now Batman is not even a boy among men, he's more like a flea among men.I'm not the biggest comic book fan, but I'm well versed in the DC and Marvel... well, 'verses.
But I've never understood why Superman would ever need Batman's help.
OK except, using your analogy, how would Batman have helped fix that situation? Superman promised he would get the nuke headed for Hackensack and he threw it into space, so what's Batman going to do? Fly to California and throw that nuke into space also?Quite simply, he cannot be in two places at once.
See: The first Superman movie.
But DC still holds on to the notion that a guy can put on a pair of glasses and completely fool everyone around him.
Look, it's not impossible, the Avengers balanced it quite well with Thor/Hulk and the useless Hawkeye. Maybe Clarke getting corrupted into the peanut flicking bad guy in 3 while Batman tries to stop him and talks him round could work, or maybe not. But at least they are trying. If they play Bats off a the psyco that has plan to beat all of the other memebers of the JLA that would be cool.
If they got a good writer, like Frank Miller, to put together a story, it would be a good movie. Unfortunately, however, I have no doubt whatsoever it will be a typical lame misunderstanding that leads the heroes to fight each other in the first half of the movie before teaming up to defeat the real enemy in the 2nd half.
Sorry, but that's just weaksauce which does nothing to explain how people like Commissioner Gordon and Perry White are simply the biggest morons on the planet. (I'm not including Lois Lane in there because I've lost track of her relationship to Superman in the current iteration of the comic books)DC holds on to the notion that people don't expect a guy capable of flying around at super speeds, shooting lasers out of their eyes while being able to move mountains to even have an alter ego.
I'm not sure what you mean by that since he hasn't really had a big budget movie. He had a pair of low-to-medium budget movies which did quite well at the box office and were high quality films, each of which were stylistically a radical departure from the usual Hollywood nonsense.I like Millers style, I just do not think it translates to big budget movies.
Because in order for a movie to be good, it has to be internally consistent. People can handle the idea of a guy from another planet coming to Earth and having mind-blowingly incredible power since that's the premise of the film. What they cannot handle is establishing this supremely powerful individual and following it with the ridiculous inconsistency and plot hole that would accompany a storyline where a human being with no super powers whatsoever went toe to toe with him, even with all the gadgets at his disposal.I don't get why so many around here try and over think these things. It's stories and movies about superheros. They're not supposed to be plausible or make complete sense. Unless you believe that someone can actually have superhuman strength, can fly, and move faster than the speed of sound.
Sorry, but just because something works in comic books does not mean it will work on the big screen. A movie is going to be held to higher standards and is going to have to appeal to a wider audience than the comic fanboys.I'm sorry but that's just being ridiculous. It's part of the storyline in the comics and I don't recall people crying about this notion. But if they put it in movie form they're going to have a hard time with it? I guess I just don't get that notion.
As long as they don't cast Ryan Gosling, I'm okay with that. Ironically, the only two actors I'll miss the most in a recast are Michael Caine's Alfred and Morgan Freeman's Fox.
I saw Idris Elba's name somewhere and I think he'd be a great, great Batman. I'm also pretty sure there would be riots in the streets if he were to get the part.
Because in order for a movie to be good, it has to be internally consistent. People can handle the idea of a guy from another planet coming to Earth and having mind-blowingly incredible power since that's the premise of the film. What they cannot handle is establishing this supremely powerful individual and following it with the ridiculous inconsistency and plot hole that would accompany a storyline where a human being with no super powers whatsoever went toe to toe with him, even with all the gadgets at his disposal.
The Joker and Bane are great villains for a Batman film, but just wouldn't work in a Superman film, for what are hopefully obvious reasons.