Would Dak Had Continued Playing Like Herbert Did?

[LucaBrasi]

Toughness, mental or physical, aren’t traits Prescott lacks imo

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

I don't remember when you introduced the injury clause to the bet, where you said it will declare the other the winner?

You said it would be off if one misses 4 games.

It's ok, it shows everyone who you are. For someone who preaches a "winners mindset", this is pathetic.

I don't care about the "injury clause".

Mahomes started with a 5 TD 0INT lead on Dak and Dak answered with a 0 TD 1 INT game before getting injured.

As I said... easy wins for me against you Dallas Prescott fans. Anybody that thinks Dak is a great QB is an easy win because you clearly don't think logically and aren't football smart at all.

 

[Redsfan_83]

I didn't see anything extraordinary from Herbert last night.

Maybe i wasn't watching closely enough.

Everett was very lazy on that play, and it really wasn't on Herbert the guy was gassed and either should have come out or they call another play. I think Herbert has the best stats of a QB over the first two years of their career, pretty sure that is very impressive.. but, he has his brain farts and stats mean nothing until he wins a ring

 

[Rodney308]

This is a Dallas Cowboys forum.

Why should we be up in arms about the Chargers QB throwing an INT?

You're right. I wouldn't say that, because I think Dak stinks.

May you should inform the OP that this is a Dallas Cowboys forum. I mean, after all, he's the one that brought the Chargers QB into this forum.

 

[Ken]

I don't care about the "injury clause".

Mahomes started with a 5 TD 0INT lead on Dak and Dak answered with a 0 TD 1 INT game before getting injured.

As I said... easy wins for me against you Dallas Prescott fans. Anybody that thinks Dak is a great QB is an easy win because you clearly don't think logically and aren't football smart at all.

It would have been a 17 game season.

For instance....last year Patty started with 6 tds and 1 int (because it wasn't dropped) and more yards, yet still lost to Dak in the identical bet.

Dak also had more than one clunker last year.

hmmmmm

 

[PAPPYDOG]

Dak relates injuries to personal success for him.
Think about it he's 1-4 playing on the tag and BOOM the ankle goes south.
End result 160 million $ contract.
Did the injury help him achieve it?
Absolutely, positively, YES as sympathy and goodwill goes a long way with the fans!
He's copping out once again with this current injury and hoping and probably expecting it will once again work in his favor.
He will be proven wrong!

P.S.A Zeke warning is in effect as I'm worried he will do his best to sabotage the offense due to his friendship with Dak.
Does anyone remember his 2 fumbles vs the Cards after the Dalton win vs the Giants????

 

[noshame]

Please refrain from mentioning any Cowboys QB since Aikman with Herbert

 

[zrinkill]

As pissed as I am at Dak at the moment ..... Questioning his physical toughness is just stupid.

Based on the last two games I have seen him play, I am starting to doubt his football in game IQ ..... But not his toughness.

 

[G2]

Prescott needs to be dragged into the street and beaten.

 

[RustyBourneHorse]

You lost me in your soccer comparison when you said "The strikers are relatively comparable". There is nobody outside of a few on this forum that believe Dak and Herbert are relatively comparable.

But by your logic everyone I think is better than Dak should never throw a bad pass. That's just unrealistic way to look at it. It happens.

But that's my point. Every QB does make a bad pass, and every QB makes a great pass. Dak's made some crap balls, and I made it very clear my thoughts on those on Sunday when I was commenting during the match. However, he's also made excellent throws, as has Herbert. My point is about the reaction to the balls that are thrown. If Dak makes a bad ball, then fine, criticise it. However, if you're going to not afford the "it happens" to him, then it shouldn't be afforded as easily to the other player. Especially if you expect more from the other player by stating that you think that they are better. If Herbert plays an appalling match (and it happens to all QBs as you well know), then it's fair to critique him just as it is when Dak plays one.

They have different styles, but I do think one can make the argument that Dak might have features that are comparable. For one thing, Herbert has better receivers and a better oline than Dak has atm. As we saw last year, they played a very comparable match when each side had a relatively even matchup, which they did. That's a good indication that, while they're not the same type of player, they are, however, comparable in terms of how they fare in differing circumstances. If the roles were reversed and Herbert were our QB, how do you think he'd fare if Lamb was the 1 WR (when he should really be the slot or 2 WR), and an absolutely dismal left oline?

 

[Ken]

Everett was very lazy on that play, and it really wasn't on Herbert the guy was gassed and either should have come out or they call another play. I think Herbert has the best stats of a QB over the first two years of their career, pretty sure that is very impressive.. but, he has his brain farts and stats mean nothing until he wins a ring

Ya, i saw the play and called exactly what happened when it did. Everett (who seems like a nice player btw) was asking out after multiple plays in a row. Hebert ran hurry up which prevented him from getting off the field.

He ran a half-speed route but Herbert tried to force it in there with guys all around him.

That is on Herbert, it wasn't there.

 

[G2]

Prescott needs to be dragged into the street and beaten.

On pay-per-view

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

It would have been a 17 game season.

For instance....last year Patty started with 6 tds and 1 int (because it wasn't dropped) and more yards, yet still lost to Dak in the identical bet.

Dak also had more than one clunker last year.

hmmmmm

I hope you don't bet actual money on Dak, Ken.

You're insufferable to try and talk football with, but I still don't like to see someone get absolutely taken advantage of because they are loyal to a player to fault.

 

[RustyBourneHorse]

But that's my point. Every QB does make a bad pass, and every QB makes a great pass. Dak's made some crap balls, and I made it very clear my thoughts on those on Sunday when I was commenting during the match. However, he's also made excellent throws, as has Herbert. My point is about the reaction to the balls that are thrown. If Dak makes a bad ball, then fine, criticise it. However, if you're going to not afford the "it happens" to him, then it shouldn't be afforded as easily to the other player. Especially if you expect more from the other player by stating that you think that they are better. If Herbert plays an appalling match (and it happens to all QBs as you well know), then it's fair to critique him just as it is when Dak plays one.

They have different styles, but I do think one can make the argument that Dak might have features that are comparable. For one thing, Herbert has better receivers and a better oline than Dak has atm. As we saw last year, they played a very comparable match when each side had a relatively even matchup, which they did. That's a good indication that, while they're not the same type of player, they are, however, comparable in terms of how they fare in differing circumstances. If the roles were reversed and Herbert were our QB, how do you think he'd fare if Lamb was the 1 WR (when he should really be the slot or 2 WR), and an absolutely dismal left oline?

Oh, and more importantly, Herbert doesn't have Kellen Moore for an OC, so that's a massive advantage to Herbert as well.

 

[Plankton]

Pro football players are physically tougher than 99.999% of the people walking the streets. Most players are not going to pull themselves out of a game unless it's readily apparent that they cannot go, or are hurting their team by remaining in the game. The OP is raising a ridiculous concept in an effort to dog Prescott more. If you don't like him as the QB of the Cowboys, you have plenty of avenues to use to support your viewpoint. Questioning his physical toughness is not one of them.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

But that's my point. Every QB does make a bad pass, and every QB makes a great pass. Dak's made some crap balls, and I made it very clear my thoughts on those on Sunday when I was commenting during the match. However, he's also made excellent throws, as has Herbert. My point is about the reaction to the balls that are thrown. If Dak makes a bad ball, then fine, criticise it. However, if you're going to not afford the "it happens" to him, then it shouldn't be afforded as easily to the other player. Especially if you expect more from the other player by stating that you think that they are better. If Herbert plays an appalling match (and it happens to all QBs as you well know), then it's fair to critique him just as it is when Dak plays one.

They have different styles, but I do think one can make the argument that Dak might have features that are comparable. For one thing, Herbert has better receivers and a better oline than Dak has atm. As we saw last year, they played a very comparable match when each side had a relatively even matchup, which they did. That's a good indication that, while they're not the same type of player, they are, however, comparable in terms of how they fare in differing circumstances. If the roles were reversed and Herbert were our QB, how do you think he'd fare if Lamb was the 1 WR (when he should really be the slot or 2 WR), and an absolutely dismal left oline?

Yeah.

I agree with almost none of this. If you think Dak and Herbert are comparable even at the smallest of scales then we are just wasting our time here going back and forth.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Pro football players are physically tougher than 99.999% of the people walking the streets. Most players are not going to pull themselves out of a game unless it's readily apparent that they cannot go, or are hurting their team by remaining in the game. The OP is raising a ridiculous concept in an effort to dog Prescott more. If you don't like him as the QB of the Cowboys, you have plenty of avenues to use to support your viewpoint. Questioning his physical toughness is not one of them.

Have you ever missed a day of work because you wore the wrong shoe?

 

[Ken]

I hope you don't bet actual money on Dak, Ken.

You're insufferable to try and talk football with, but I still don't like to see someone get absolutely taken advantage of because they are loyal to a player to fault.

It must suck for you to have to talk facts and not feels.

It's ok, I know you realize you are being a bit pig-headed about this bet.

 

[PAPPYDOG]

Prescott needs to be dragged into the street and beaten.

He prefers parking lots......

 

[Proof]

I know Romo would have and did in a way but I'm curious. After seeing how Justin Herbert got back in the game against the Chiefs and kept on playing QB despite being injured in what I think were his ribs, I wonder if Dak would have gone out there and tried his best to win the game like how Herbert almost did. Would he have stayed on the sidelines to not risk any more serious injuries to his ribs or would he have tried to do what Romo did in 2011 against SF and what Herbert did? Would he have fared better than Herbert did?

Really makes you wonder how different those two are as QB and if Herbert might be the better QB due to what we all saw against the Chiefs. Your thoughts guys?

couple of years ago his hand swoll up like a balloon and he continued to play and played better than he did prior to the injury