What is the argument for turf though?
Because owners spend less money?
Data being equal, give me grass.
Don't care about data from a far perspective.
.
I care about there's been I'm sure much much bigger investigations, research, test etc into this by the league and the owners and this has nothing to do with money at all....
You act like these owners don't spend money on these extravagant stadiums and all this other stuff for the players especially Jerry and everyone else but there are far too many indoor stadiums now you cannot put grass in there.
Also it's almost impossible to maintain grass even on some of the outdoor stadiums to a point where you can keep it actually well-groomed and ready to play without potholes, mud tearing up of all the grass... I mean we've seen that stuff in San Francisco we've seen the frozen tundra we've seen much more dangerous grass fields because of the elements being able to destroy it and make it impossible people slipping falling I mean come on dude give it a break I'm tired of hearing about it there are much smarter people that put much more effort and time behind the scenes in doing research on this than you then fancy a guy get hurt dancy players overreact to someone getting hurt and really there is no doubt that to support it either way...
By the way how big is story and nonsense and overreactions last year's Super Bowl about how bad the turf was??
From what I'm reading it was actually real grass it was a bland they gave the guys real grass..
The turf is Tahoma 31 and it's among the newer breeds of grass that have been developed with the funding of the United States Golf Association. Tahoma 31 is a mix of two types of Bermuda grasses and rye grass, and it was developed at Oklahoma State University under the watchful eye of Dr. Yanqi Wu. He started the process of creating Tahoma 31 in 2006, when he crossed China Bermuda grass and African Bermuda grass. A year later, the seeds were harvested and the grass was tested and studied all over the country until 2018.
How'd that work out bro?? Seriously I mean we've seen championship games in San Francisco and other places with bad grass because of the elements that made some difference as much as some people around here complaining about the light coming through the glass at AT&T like it's some big deal and affecting so many games I'm telling you that and people are overreacting to this field turf..
They played on far worse fields in the 70s with the astroturf and all the other stuff that was developed in between.. And yet less of a big deal was made about injuries look players are getting bigger stronger and faster and they're just getting hurt and that you can't blame the grass it's part of the sport people have blown Achilles out on all surfaces people have blown ACL's out on all surfaces..
Now back to talking about football instead of grass versus turf... Which by the way again I believe the league and the owners have spent far much more money and time and research into this than you or any other fan could possibly do..