LovinItAll
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,766
- Reaction score
- 1,842
I think it’s already been proven that artificial turf produces more injuries, at least with the older turfs of 7+ years ago. Not sure about the newer versions.Some people were saying that Aaron Rodgers would not have been injured on real grass instead of field turf. I'm honestly not sure what's true. I do know that both real grass and field turf beats the pants off that awful astroturf they used to play on. The claim some made is that real grass would have given way, thus preventing his injury. However, does that also mean that real grass fields are more prone to holes and uneven spaces, or even dirt patches? Field turf was billed as just as safe as grass, but is it more nuanced than that? Maybe it has its pros and cons, but the same thing can be said of real grass fields?
...
I know that the game can never guarantee no injuries, but I want them to use whatever is best.
These teams have gobs of money. The players should insist on natural grass in the next CBA. They can even grow grass indoors in northern climates in the winter. It isn’t cheap, but…..Aaron Rodgers.