kmd24
Active Member
- Messages
- 3,436
- Reaction score
- 0
Hostile said:In today's NFL I find this to be a strange statement. No one is that good. You're basically telling me with that last comment that for the next 5 years we won't have opportunities to draft someone who will turn out to be better. This totally flies in the face of all relevant history including Bledsoe's. Does the name Tom Brady ring any bells?
No it doesn't. I already posted this fact, but I am happy to repeat it for you. Of all the modern free agency era QB's (18), only Bledsoe and Brady have reached the SB prior to their fifth pro season. That it what I am basing my statement upon.
Maybe we'll get lucky and hit with Romo or Henson, or maybe a draftee, but in general it is a slow process with QB's.
BTW, my statement has less to do with how good Bledsoe is and more to do with how difficult it is in today's NFL to hit on a QB and develop him quickly. Even if Dallas manages to secure a top flight player in the draft, it will take some time for him to develop.
Top echelon guys just don't become available in FA. And I am considering Bledsoe when I make that statement.
Hostile said:You're also telling me that there is no way Henson or Romo could play as good or better. I'm interested in knowing how you can determine this? Upon what do you base this that is factual and not speculation?
I'm not saying this. I actually think Romo or Henson are the best shot the Cowboys have at improving the position in the short term (not immediately), but the general consensus is that both have a long road ahead of them. I think either would be a step back before taking several steps forward. But you have to try at some point.
What I think will happen is that Drew will start for the next couple of years, and then one of the young guys will come in and take a couple years to get his feet under him.
Maybe it is better to start the process now, but it seems to me that the team is on the cusp of something big in the immediate future, and I'd hate to see the Cowboys take a step back now for the sake of something nebulous and in the more distant future.
Hostile said:You're also telling me that no player who may be a Free Agent in the next 5 years will be as good. No one? How in the world has Drew Bledsoe not won 13 straight Super Bowls? I mean this is Herculean legendary status we are approaching.
Hopefully someone will become available, but past history suggests such players won't be available. Of the guys who project to be FA in the near future, none seem very exciting to me. It's been that way for several years now.
Hostile said:You're also telling me that for the next 5 years he'll be 100% healthy. How do you know this? Where can I buy that crystal ball? I want one.
Pretty hard to say whether any QB will be healthy. Bledsoe has been pretty durable, so I don't see why anyone should predict otherwise for the next couple years. Maybe you're the one with the crystal ball?
Just to avoid confusion, I'm not saying that DB will be the Cowboys QB for the next 5 years. If that's what you inferred, you are reading too much into what I said.
Hostile said:Now, as to my thread earlier about expectations, let's be honest shall we. The thread author who admits he is not a Cowboys fan, but is a Bledsoe fan, posted a comment that Drew Bledsoe compares favorably to Troy Aikman and Roger Staubach. Upon what did he base this claim? On QB ratings. My reply regarding explanations was in reaction to that silly contention. Are you now telling me Bledsoe does compare favorably to Aikman and Staubach? If so I'm going to be shocked.
I have already said my piece to neil about Aikman vs. Bledsoe.
Hostile said:I inferred nothing about whether or not I believe he can win Super Bowls in Dallas. If you want to know whether I think he can or not please ask.
Fair enough?
You didn't mean to imply anything? So you were just throwing out random facts?
Let me clue you in to how debate works. When you bring up statistics and facts, they necessarily imply something. That's the whole reason you bring them up. It's your job to get your point across and mine to make sure I infer properly and understand what you mean. That is why I did ask you (slightly indirectly) if my inference was incorrect.