More fun debunking the myth that giving ANYTHING up for Daunte Culpepper would be a terrible idea;
The two biggest knocks against Bledsoe, are his turnovers, and sacks right? Let's take an interesting look at the two players numbers, in those regards;
Turnovers
Drew Bledsoe
For his career, he has 198 INTs, and 48 lost fumbles. That is a total of 242 turnovers, for his career. He has started 187 games. That calculates out to 1.32 turnovers per game.
Daunte Culpepper
For his career, he has 86 INTs, and 33 lost fumbles. That is a total of 119 turnovers, for his career. He has started 80 games. That calculates out to 1.49 turnovers per game.
Culpepper turns the ball over, 0.17 times more, per start, than Bledsoe. Doesn't seem like alot, but over a 16 game season, that gets to be almost 3 more turnovers, per year.
Sacks
Drew Bledsoe
Has been sacked 451 times in his career. Over 187 games, that comes out to 2.4 sacks per game.
Daunte Culpepper
Has been sacked 228 times in his career. Over 80 games, that comes out to 2.85 sacks per game
That comes out to a difference of 0.45 sacks per game. Over a 16 game season, that's an extra 7.2 sacks, that Culpepper would register than Bledsoe.
So, If I calculate right....Bledsoe's salary is 3.5 million, Culpepper's is approximately 10, right? So, in essence, we would be paying an extra 6.5 million dollars, for 3 more turnovers, and 7.2 more sacks, every year.
Now THAT would be something for zoners to ***** about.