Would you trade... RW11 and a 2nd for Marshall..

[Cover 2]

I have no more evidence to prove that he DIDNT hit her than you saying that he did.

Not sure what your problem is, but I find it funny that people dont want him when he easily could be innocent.

Too many coincidences for me to believe he was falsely accused every single time.

 

[Cowboy Brian]

Too many coincidences for me to believe he was falsely accused every single time.

I believe both sides are not saying something, I lean towards Brandons story though, he had no reason to hit her in a taxi.

 

[Hoofbite]

I believe both sides are not saying something, I lean towards Brandons story though, he had no reason to hit her in a taxi.

Can't really think of any reasons that would justify hitting a woman.

 

[thechosen1n2]

Marshall would likely be the one that sees most of the double coverage, and Austin would likely see single with a good amount of double as well. If anyone were to benefit the most from this it would be Witten who would be singled. This trade would be a best case amazing scenario, the chances it would happen is very very minimal. But we can all dream

that what i was thinking. LOL...miles seeing doubles over marshall.

 

[thechosen1n2]

If they didn't want to pay Marshall, what makes you think they'll take on RW's contract?

great question...i mean GREAT question.

 

[AustnIsMySaviour]

when is the last time a team won a superbowl with two #1 wide receivers?

the answer would be never cause it isn't necessary to waste the money on a #1 wr if you already have one.

if your denying the fact that marshall wouldnt make them a better team then you clearly have no idea what your talking about. Who would they double ? Witten would be left with single coverage and everyone knows hes impossible yo cover 1 on 1. We'd literally be unstoppable. MAKE IT HAPPEN JERRY

 

[Cowboy Brian]

Marty B wants it to happen!