WoW - Favre wants release from Packers!

Mansta54

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,945
Reaction score
482
Yeagermeister;2141786 said:
That's a BIG if. They don't have to release him.

If they don't want him, yes, they have to release him. They damn sure not gonna keep him on the bench behind Rogers...
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
Chocolate Lab;2141789 said:
How do you figure? Like the article says, he's still property of the Packers. If he wants to play, they can force him to write the reinstatement letter, when they can trade him.

Loyalty is a two-way street. If I'm the Pack, I don't let him go so he can sign with Chicago or Minny and beat me twice a year. Which I could see happening.

:hammer:
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,391
Reaction score
102,350
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Yeagermeister;2141783 said:
They have all of the leverage. He retired and they put him on the retired list. They don't have to do anything with him. If he wants to come back GB has to take him off their retired list or he can wait until his contract runs out.

Wrong.

Green Bay has to put him and his salary back on their roster or release him.
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
Mansta54;2141792 said:
If they don't want him, yes, they have to release him. They damn sure not gonna keep him on the bench behind Rogers...

They can keep him on their retired list if they want to.
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
stasheroo;2141795 said:
Wrong.

Green Bay has to put him and his salary back on their roster or release him.

Where does it say they have to put him back on their roster?
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,391
Reaction score
102,350
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Chocolate Lab;2141789 said:
How do you figure? Like the article says, he's still property of the Packers. If he wants to play, they can force him to write the reinstatement letter, when they can trade him.

Loyalty is a two-way street. If I'm the Pack, I don't let him go so he can sign with Chicago or Minny and beat me twice a year. Which I could see happening.

1) They have to put him and his contract on their roster.

2) Nobody is going to trade for him knowing Green Bay won't keep him

3) Favre has now publicly asked for his release

The Packers are forced to cut him and he can sign wherever he likes.
 

Mansta54

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,945
Reaction score
482
Yeagermeister;2141796 said:
They can keep him on their retired list if they want to.

No they can't, not if he doesn't want to be retired and writes a letter sating so. He and his salary goes back on the Pack...
 

Chief

"Friggin Joke Monkey"
Messages
8,543
Reaction score
4
From Chris Mortensen of ESPN.com ....


HATTIESBURG, Miss -- Three days after a conference call with Green Bay Packers team officials on Tuesday in which quarterback Brett Favre emphatically expressed his desire to play in 2008, Favre on Friday formally asked for his contractual release from the Packers in a letter, sources close to Favre and the team said.

The letter was sent by Favre's agent, James "Bus" Cook, via overnight mail on Thursday and arrived at the Packers facility Friday morning.

Cook, on behalf of Favre, expressed a desire to have an amicable parting, as the Packers have been reluctant to embrace his return. Favre announced his retirement in early March.

During a conference call on Tuesday that included Packers general manager Ted Thompson, Packers coach Mike McCarthy, Favre and Cook, sources say that the quarterback stated emphatically that he wanted to play again.

When Favre was reminded by the Packers' brass that it was in March when the quarterback said publicly and privately that he wasn't 100 percent committed to football, sources said. Favre acknowledged his state of mind at the time, but added that he never felt he was a 100 percent committed in March of previous years, either. Favre felt he had to make a decision to retire because the Packers were pressing him for an answer, a source said.

During the same conference call on Tuesday, neither Thompson nor McCarthy were openly receptive or enthused about Favre's desire to un-retire, the sources said, prompting Favre to direct Cook to request his release from the Packers. Favre has three years remaining on his contract for a total of $39 million. He currently is on the reserve-retired list.

Favre wants a mutual parting rather than having to force the Packers' hand by writing a letter to request his reinstatement to the active 80-man roster. Under league policy, the team would have to comply or release him.

Cook's letter did suggest that Favre's accomplishments for the franchise merited the team honoring his request to be released, also asking that the action be taken "with no strings attached." Favre does not want to be traded, sources said, because he wants the freedom of choice to play for any other franchise.

Favre has been in communication with McCarthy during the past month about his desire to play but until this week had not spoken with Thompson.

Neither Thompson nor McCarthy were available for comment on Friday.

Favre did not wish to speak publicly about his situation when approached while working out Friday morning at a local high school in Hattiesburg. He appeared to be in excellent physical condition and threw the ball with ease, even throwing a football 50 yards "on a rope" with high school receivers. He has been throwing and running with the team for more than a month.

Favre was relaxed and in a positive frame of mind, joking and telling stories about himself, former teammates and coaches. He planned to continue working out next week.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,391
Reaction score
102,350
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Yeagermeister;2141802 said:
Where does it say they have to put him back on their roster?

League rules.

If they want to retain his rights they have to.
 

Mansta54

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,945
Reaction score
482
stasheroo;2141803 said:
1) They have to put him and his contract on their roster.

2) Nobody is going to trade for him knowing Green Bay won't keep him

3) Favre has now publicly asked for his release

The Packers are forced to cut him and he can sign wherever he likes.

Why is this so hard for folks to see.. It's just this simple..:bang2:
 

VACowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,983
Reaction score
3,850
Man, what a selfish move.

But, he made his attitude clear when he plainly stated that it wasn't his job to help teach young players.

If I'm the Pack, I release him at 1:00 PM eastern on on opening Sunday.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
53,667
Reaction score
32,041
If Joe Montana can leave San Francisco to play for the KC Chiefs, nobody is off limits.

Let him go.
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
36,588
Reaction score
9,847
You guys aren't getting it. Sure, he has to be active again for the Pack to trade him, but just because he asks for it doesn't mean he gets it. Otherwise, players who were unhappy with their contracts would just "retire" and then ask for a release, when they'd be a free agent. It doesn't work like that. He's under contract, and he's only going to be free if they do him a favor.

The part I disagree with is that "no one will trade for him". Why wouldn't they?
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
stasheroo;2141803 said:
1) They have to put him and his contract on their roster.

2) Nobody is going to trade for him knowing Green Bay won't keep him

3) Favre has now publicly asked for his release

The Packers are forced to cut him and he can sign wherever he likes.

If I'm the Packers is put him back on the roster and wait to who offers a trade before releasing him.
 

bbgun

Benched
Messages
27,869
Reaction score
6
They have the cap room to take him back at full salary and bench him. Of course, that would invite controversy and huge distractions, so look for him to be traded to an AFC team.
 

mbanx

New Member
Messages
851
Reaction score
0
Hostile;2141714 said:
Please not Minnesota.

That would be scary. How are their recievers? I think almost everyone agrees the ground game is definitley solid.
 

Mansta54

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,945
Reaction score
482
Chocolate Lab;2141814 said:
You guys aren't getting it. Sure, he has to be active again for the Pack to trade him, but just because he asks for it doesn't mean he gets it. Otherwise, players who were unhappy with their contracts would just "retire" and then ask for a release, when they'd be a free agent. It doesn't work like that. He's under contract, and he's only going to be free if they do him a favor.

The part I disagree with is that "no one will trade for him". Why wouldn't they?

Maybe, but the Pack have to be able to fit his salary on the roster...
 
Top