WR by committee didn't work, will RB by committee work?

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,575
Reaction score
15,809
I know it's two different positions, but when you have too many of something in football you don't have anything!! Who gets the start, who gets the most touches, who is able to find a rhythm? I think we're doing ourselves a disservice to this season by counting on multiple RBS to do the job. The easy way would be to get a starter, and have a solid back up/change of pace back.

I don't see this working, but who knows. Please give your thoughts
 

exciter

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,714
Reaction score
3,543
I know it's two different positions, but when you have too many of something in football you don't have anything!! Who gets the start, who gets the most touches, who is able to find a rhythm? I think we're doing ourselves a disservice to this season by counting on multiple RBS to do the job. The easy way would be to get a starter, and have a solid back up/change of pace back.

I don't see this working, but who knows. Please give your thoughts
Receiver didn’t work because it was a bunch of #4 and #5 receivers.
Zeke would probably be best as the #2 but in McCarthy’s pass to run offense who knows?
RB as a position is so different from receiver even if one of the others doesn’t step up there should be plenty of suitable candidates by the end of camp or available without having to invest a lot of draft capital to acquire one!
Looking around the league there’s multiple teams who are 4 to 5 deep at the position with names who on paper at least sound better than what’s here!
 

MoistMayonnaise

Devil's Advocate
Messages
4,354
Reaction score
7,885
giphy.gif
 

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
42,167
Reaction score
41,915
I know it's two different positions, but when you have too many of something in football you don't have anything!! Who gets the start, who gets the most touches, who is able to find a rhythm? I think we're doing ourselves a disservice to this season by counting on multiple RBS to do the job. The easy way would be to get a starter, and have a solid back up/change of pace back.

I don't see this working, but who knows. Please give your thoughts
You’re title reeks of trying to attract negative responses.
 

RonWashington

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,071
Reaction score
6,457
Sanders Gainwell Scott later Swift Gainwell Scott with the Eagles . I think it’s smart to use multiple backs .
 

quickccc

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,272
Reaction score
14,169
WR JAGS by committee ...

RB JAGS by committee ..

..and we know Stephen not interested in paying any more money for a starting RB per trade
 
Top