You can count on Dalton Schultz not returning

USArmyVet said:
Funny how it's a team that loses when Dak chokes but now somehow Herbert played all positions alone? Typical.
Click to expand...
Just wondered if you were aware of the facts as you typically are not. :muttley:

Its always a team game. Are you finally figuring this out?

I would never say anything as dumb as Hebert played all positions alone. I leave those kind of comments up to people like you.

According to you, stats are for losers and winning is all that matters. Hebert is a guy that puts up lots of stats, yet his team does little. He chokes at times late in big games and what has his team done since he got into the NFL? Barely made the playoffs one year and got punted in the first round.

Where was Hebert in the 2nd half against the Jags and basically choked according to you. All while Dak and the Cowboys were spanking Brady to the tune of 300 yards and 5 TD's in a blowout.

Yet you call Herbert "a real QB"?

So do stats matter now? Does team success not matter? Just a little confused with your laughable hypocrite logic.
 
CowboyRoy said:
Just wondered if you were aware of the facts as you typically are not. :muttley:

According to you, stats are for losers and winning is all that matters. Hebert is a guy that puts up lots of stats, yet his team does little. He chokes at times late in big games and what has his team done since he got into the NFL? Barely made the playoffs one year and got punted in the first round.

Where was Hebert in the 2nd half against the Jags and basically choked according to you.

Yet you call him "a real QB".

So do stats matter now? Does team success not matter? Just a little confused with your laughable hypocrite logic.
Click to expand...
Who do you take in a hypothetical on Dallas based on play and ability: Herbert or Dak?
 
USArmyVet said:
Who do you take in a hypothetical on Dallas based on play and ability: Herbert or Dak?
Click to expand...
Im taking Hebert on ability and hoping he can mature as a leader and clutch performer.

At the moment he is all stats and little team success. Exactly what you claim Dak is.

Can you see the irony? Are you telling me that you can see through the meaningless stats and lack of team success with Hebert? :lmao::laugh:
 
ghst187 said:
It will be a slight step down to lose him but you can’t pay everyone esp when you pay a done RB the highest contract in history plus a mediocre QB like he’s elite.
He and Dak had some chemistry but we should be okay with hendershot and fergy
Click to expand...

That's the problem here, though. You can't keep Zeke and not keep Schultz.

Cowboys really need to focus on the Zeke issue, and stand tough on it.
 
Losing Schultz will be another hit to our passing game. He’s been a security blanket for Dak. However, the young TE’s did show potential. Still not sold on either one of them yet. Most of the top offenses have a great TE. The Cowboys have been blessed with several great TE’s over the years.
 
CowboyRoy said:
Im taking Hebert on ability and hoping he can mature as a leader and clutch performer.

At the moment he is all stats and little team success. Exactly what you claim Dak is.

Can you see the irony? Are you telling me that you can see through the meaningless stats and lack of team success with Hebert? :lmao::laugh:
Click to expand...
It needs to fit the narrative. If Dak loses in the playoffs it's because he wasn't good enough. If Herbert loses in the playoffs it's because the team around him failed.

However, if we say Dak needs a better team around him it's an indictment against him but it's not an indictment against Herbert to say the same.

And why? Because people have a predetermined agenda against Dak. I am not going to be delusional here and say Prescott is absolutely elite. But he is certainly good enough to win a Super Bowl with enough support. And unless you have a genarational talent at quarterback the same is true for all the teams that don't have a Mahomes or a Burrow.
 
Pass2Run said:
That's the problem here, though. You can't keep Zeke and not keep Schultz.

Cowboys really need to focus on the Zeke issue, and stand tough on it.
Click to expand...
Yeah agree but we probably should move on from both.
 
CT Dal Fan said:
It needs to fit the narrative. If Dak loses in the playoffs it's because he wasn't good enough. If Herbert loses in the playoffs it's because the team around him failed.

However, if we say Dak needs a better team around him it's an indictment against him but it's not an indictment against Herbert to say the same.

And why? Because people have a predetermined agenda against Dak. I am not going to be delusional here and say Prescott is absolutely elite. But he is certainly good enough to win a Super Bowl with enough support. And unless you have a genarational talent at quarterback the same is true for all the teams that don't have a Mahomes or a Burrow.
Click to expand...
Teams win SB's and games, not QB's. Until most of these clowns understand that concept they will never understand football or be able to analyze QB's other than guys like Mahomes. The extent of their football knowledge is figuring out that Mahomes is great. So all they do is run around crying that someone isnt Mahomes or that we need Mahomes.

Its not what QB's need to win, its what teams need to win. Again, a football and QB challenged fan would equate this to what Dak needs to win.
 
Pass2Run said:
That's the problem here, though. You can't keep Zeke and not keep Schultz.

Cowboys really need to focus on the Zeke issue, and stand tough on it.
Click to expand...
You can get rid of both and probably should. Zeke can replaced by almost anyone and we get an upgrade. Shultz you need to replace his importance in the passing game.

Last year was a perfect example. Getting rid of Cooper was 100% the easy call and the correct one. However what did we replace him with? That part of the equation was poorly done.

1. Moving on from Cooper =A
2. Compensation in trading Cooper = F
3. Replacement for Cooper = C

If the Cowboys featured Pollard more in the passing game and got Turpin more involved here and there that would have taken up much of the slack. However, they didnt do that. Then take into account that they replaced Cooper with Brown and it became a problem.

Still had they just used the weapons more than they did have, it would have been fine. Tolbert not developing at all was also a big blow.
 
I don’t know about college ball but watching the combine they were talking about it being a tough year to be a FA TE because there’s tons of talent in this draft. Schultz should have went long term.
 
I’m fine with letting Shultz walk. I think Ferguson is going to be special and I like Hendershot too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

... and 69 more.
Total: 4,892 (members: 169, guests: 4,723)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,089
Messages
13,788,206
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top