CowboyoWales
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,429
- Reaction score
- 4,706
Interesting post and whether the best (or even achievable) method of going ALL-IN is trading for players that sends you over the top or when you're plugging that one/two glaring weaknesses.This is what we've been accustomed to hearing, and we end up seeing the results of these comments we're being fed every off season. You can't build a team through FA, but you CAN acquire talent if you get the right guys that can elevate a team such as this team.
We have to get over the past, and focus on the present. Look around the league and see what happens when you make sound moves! Of course not every move will get you to the Superbowl, but at least try!! Please give your thoughts
To be fair, the possible thinking behind the 'pick' was that a blocking TE would/could improve the running game, regardless of the running game (in the eventuality Pollard went down again), he also met the idea we were going to a TCO (and presumably 12 man personnel).Correct. Which is why taking Schooner in the 2nd was such a monumental mistake. We took a luxury pick in the 2nd w/ glaring holes at LB and DT. That is the problem w/ having a non-football guy as a GM. He wasn't able to assess our areas of need.
My point is can you go ALL-IN when you're fire fighting with glaring holes.
If we look at the last successful AI team (Rams, 2021) isnt it that they were a good all-round team, with no real weaknesses, when then went AI with trades for.Von Miller and OBJ?