TwentyOne
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,548
- Reaction score
- 5,199
I think Romo was the better player at the QB position. Not by far but better all around. Especially in understanding the game, defensive concepts.There's very little difference between the two. Both have strengths, but also have weaknesses that always rear their ugly heads, especially come playoff time.
I always had the feeling that Romo was an improvisator For that he needed guys around him who knew exactly what he would do. So he wasnt exactly a team friendly guy. He had his one or two WRs who kew and understand his thinking. Everybody else was often lost. He wasnt able to play a system like Brady was, where everybody knew what the QB was planing to do. You could often sense that he made calls at the line of scrimage where only one guy really knew what he was planing to do. That doesnt bode well. It gives you a great play here or there. But over a longer time your losses will be bigger than your gains.
Against better defenses you could/can see their limited talent. Romo had some good games against better defenses in his career where Dak has not one.
Last edited: