Your Impressions of Stephon Gillmore?

JohnsKey19

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,511
Reaction score
18,388
He’s on his last legs.
Which is fine. They acquired him for one year understanding that a 33 year old CB is going to decline rapidly at some point. You just hope we make it thru this season before that happens.
 

ActualCowboysFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,416
Reaction score
9,498
Again, your current evaluation is base on what you assume rather than what has actually happened. Had you said you need to see more to better evaluate, I would understand that, but your position is simply to say he isn't that good without having any current evidence that suggests that.

That said, they probably won't hold Purdy to 148 yards, but that wouldn't automatically mean either Gilmore or the team didn't play very well. They could give up a lot more than 148 yards and still be good.

I'm wondering if Gilmore plays well against SF, will you just move on to Philly as the next standard, all the while saying he isn't that good? Are you going to keep moving the bar until he has a bad game and then claim that game tells the story of the whole year/
You can’t bring logic to a debate based on emotion. He’s decided his position and it doesn’t matter if it is true or false it just matters that he feels it’s correct.
 

kevm3

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,821
Reaction score
12,855
Is he elite shutdown corner Gilmore? No. But he's done a solid enough job for us to put up some of the best defensive performances in Cowboys history. Glad he's on the team.
 

eromeopolk

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,713
Reaction score
4,522
So, you start out saying he bought the cool-aid, then when you find there is no long term commitment you switch gears and say he just snatched these people up for short term name value.

Seems you're more concerned with manufacturing a complaint than focusing on reality, and you're willing to keep changing your story to do so.

As for reality, signing players on short term deals isn't unique to the Cowboys and Jerry like you want to suggest (at least your most recent suggestion). No team can fill an entire roster with high level players on long term contracts at every position. It's common to have some short term commitments to improve chances in the present.
Whether long term or short, Cooks is not Amari Cooper and Gilmore is not NE Stephon Gilmore All Pro as per his production decline that got him out of NE and Indy.

That is reality. Jerry Dumbo GM Jones has not signed a meaningful impact FA since Leroy Glover and Leonard Davis. That is reality.

Short term commitments that either block young players development or getting better younger FA is only common with the Arlington Jonesboys and Jerry Dumbo GM Jones.
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,122
Reaction score
22,616
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Whether long term or short, Cooks is not Amari Cooper and Gilmore is not NE Stephon Gilmore All Pro as per his production decline that got him out of NE and Indy.

That is reality. Jerry Dumbo GM Jones has not signed a meaningful impact FA since Leroy Glover and Leonard Davis. That is reality.

Short term commitments that either block young players development or getting better younger FA is only common with the Arlington Jonesboys and Jerry Dumbo GM Jones.
None of this changes the fact you didn't think through the mud you slung before you started slinging, and just shifted to a different mud when the first one didn't stick.

As for Cooks not being Cooper, and Gilmore not being at the peak of his career, that's just life in the NFL. Cooper's contract was prohibitive, so the team had to go a different direction. It happens in the NFL all the time. And while Gilmore may not quite be at the same level as the peak of his career, it appears he is still playing at a high level, so where is the problem?

Ultimately, no team has elite people at the prime point in their careers at every position, so it makes no sense at all to sling mud at something that is just reality for every team. Yet you act as if there should never be a player on the team that doesn't have multiple years left on his contract, as if it is possible to have top players on long term deals at every position. To think that is to ignore reality.
 

eromeopolk

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,713
Reaction score
4,522
None of this changes the fact you didn't think through the mud you slung before you started slinging, and just shifted to a different mud when the first one didn't stick.

As for Cooks not being Cooper, and Gilmore not being at the peak of his career, that's just life in the NFL. Cooper's contract was prohibitive, so the team had to go a different direction. It happens in the NFL all the time. And while Gilmore may not quite be at the same level as the peak of his career, it appears he is still playing at a high level, so where is the problem?

Ultimately, no team has elite people at the prime point in their careers at every position, so it makes no sense at all to sling mud at something that is just reality for every team. Yet you act as if there should never be a player on the team that doesn't have multiple years left on his contract, as if it is possible to have top players on long term deals at every position. To think that is to ignore reality.
Facts not mudslinging. Look at all the players that have left the Jonesboys and got Rings and Things. Cooper has one of the cheapest Pro Bowl WR contracts in the league (if not the cheapest). I already stated and showed you he took a pay cut to stay in Arlington with the Jonesboys.

Stop making things up. You ask an opinion on Gilmore and you got one on Gilmore and Cooks. Its not the deal length. We know Jerry is cheap and is not going to try to sign players to get to a Super Bowl. Because it is about being relevant and not winning championships.

If Gilmore and Cooks suddenly make me forget Cooper, Chavarious Ward, Michael Jackson, etc. then find. But that has not happen and is not happening now. Wait till next year...oh they have one year deals.
 

ActualCowboysFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,416
Reaction score
9,498
Facts not mudslinging. Look at all the players that have left the Jonesboys and got Rings and Things. Cooper has one of the cheapest Pro Bowl WR contracts in the league (if not the cheapest). I already stated and showed you he took a pay cut to stay in Arlington with the Jonesboys.

Stop making things up. You ask an opinion on Gilmore and you got one on Gilmore and Cooks. Its not the deal length. We know Jerry is cheap and is not going to try to sign players to get to a Super Bowl. Because it is about being relevant and not winning championships.

If Gilmore and Cooks suddenly make me forget Cooper, Chavarious Ward, Michael Jackson, etc. then find. But that has not happen and is not happening now. Wait till next year...oh they have one year deals.
Where did you show any of these facts? Did you post them somewhere else?
 

Teague31

Defender of the Star
Messages
18,192
Reaction score
22,779
Eh. He’s slow. Crossing routes are open against him all the time cause he can’t keep up
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,122
Reaction score
22,616
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Facts not mudslinging. Look at all the players that have left the Jonesboys and got Rings and Things. Cooper has one of the cheapest Pro Bowl WR contracts in the league (if not the cheapest). I already stated and showed you he took a pay cut to stay in Arlington with the Jonesboys.

Stop making things up. You ask an opinion on Gilmore and you got one on Gilmore and Cooks. Its not the deal length. We know Jerry is cheap and is not going to try to sign players to get to a Super Bowl. Because it is about being relevant and not winning championships.

If Gilmore and Cooks suddenly make me forget Cooper, Chavarious Ward, Michael Jackson, etc. then find. But that has not happen and is not happening now. Wait till next year...oh they have one year deals.
How is it facts when you start out saying one thing, then change to another when that doesn't work? Again, it seems more like an agenda than considering facts.

I completely agree that Jerry has been reluctant to sign impact free agents most years, but Cooks has been one of the more consistently productive WR's in the NFL the last 8-9 years, and Gilmore, while not at the pinnacle of his career, is still a very good CB. These guys don't have to be Justin Jefferson and Jalen Ramsey to be very good players that can help a team win.

Gilmore was a prize to get for what we gave up in the trade and what have to pay him, but the trade off is not having rights to him beyond this year.

And quit being obtuse about deal length. Short deal length is what helps make salaries manageable with the salary cap, The All Pro players from the season before aren't looking for short term deals, and to trade for ones still on long terms deals it would take giving up several top draft picks. Accordingly, plugging in with some very good players that can be acquired without great cost because they are at the end of their current contract is a reasonable strategy.

Again, this is not uncommon for teams to do.
 

cald0d30s0

Well-Known Member
Messages
946
Reaction score
1,001
He is better than Anthony Brown for sure so im ok with that. He is slow, yeah but he is solid and provides knowledge to young CBs. So im happy with him. I would keep him another year.
 

Praxit

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,732
Reaction score
13,811
..not much throwing on Gilly side. He gets the respect.
 

Mark

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,994
Reaction score
3,621
You don't hear his name mentioned much during the game. Which is a good thing for a corner. Fantastic upgrade at that position.
 

J-man

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,642
Reaction score
2,254
He's been fine, a little less than expected for me. But I wasn't thinking he'd come in and be an all pro like some of y'all. He's old (for a DB) trying to stay with these fresh young kids all game can wear you out.
 

eromeopolk

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,713
Reaction score
4,522
How is it facts when you start out saying one thing, then change to another when that doesn't work? Again, it seems more like an agenda than considering facts.

I completely agree that Jerry has been reluctant to sign impact free agents most years, but Cooks has been one of the more consistently productive WR's in the NFL the last 8-9 years, and Gilmore, while not at the pinnacle of his career, is still a very good CB. These guys don't have to be Justin Jefferson and Jalen Ramsey to be very good players that can help a team win.

Gilmore was a prize to get for what we gave up in the trade and what have to pay him, but the trade off is not having rights to him beyond this year.

And quit being obtuse about deal length. Short deal length is what helps make salaries manageable with the salary cap, The All Pro players from the season before aren't looking for short term deals, and to trade for ones still on long terms deals it would take giving up several top draft picks. Accordingly, plugging in with some very good players that can be acquired without great cost because they are at the end of their current contract is a reasonable strategy.

Again, this is not uncommon for teams to do.
Again for the last time. I did not say all that. I said that Cooks and Gilmore signings were name recognition signings and not team upgrade signings. That is a fact. Neither player did their former team an upgrade and both the Colts and Houston seem better off without them.

I said signing old no upgrade veterans block the development of younger players (see Tolbert out play Cooks and Bland outplay Gilmore). I also said the team would be better off had they keep the younger and bargain priced Amari Cooper as he was and upgrade to Cooks and Lamb was not ready to be a no.1 WR without Cooper.

That is fact you can not get around based on Gilmore and Cooks play so far. You are what you are.

I also said Jerry Dumbo GM Jones is a Dumbo GM.
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,122
Reaction score
22,616
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Again for the last time. I did not say all that. I said that Cooks and Gilmore signings were name recognition signings and not team upgrade signings. That is a fact. Neither player did their former team an upgrade and both the Colts and Houston seem better off without them.

I said signing old no upgrade veterans block the development of younger players (see Tolbert out play Cooks and Bland outplay Gilmore). I also said the team would be better off had they keep the younger and bargain priced Amari Cooper as he was and upgrade to Cooks and Lamb was not ready to be a no.1 WR without Cooper.

That is fact you can not get around based on Gilmore and Cooks play so far. You are what you are.

I also said Jerry Dumbo GM Jones is a Dumbo GM.
And the only reason you gave for them not being team upgrade signings is because they are temporary plug ins who aren't at the pinnacle of their careers.

By the way, are you really arguing that Gilmore and Cooks weren't brought in to be upgrades over Anthony Brown and Noah Brown? That's an incredibly nonsensical position to take.

As for their play so far, Gilmore has been very strong, and although we haven't seen much from Cooks, a hindsight judgement 4 games into the season does not remotely prove he wasn't brought in to be an upgrade over Noah Brown. Cooks has been better than the best year of Noah Brown's career for the last 8 straight years.

As for Jerry being a "Dumbo GM", I never said otherwise. That doesn't automatically mean every move is a bad one.
 

Rayman70

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,075
Reaction score
33,970
hes been beat. But still very good. He isnt what he was a few years ago but better than AB was easily. I think in December is when we will be glad we have him. He will be tested heavily this weekend.
 

SuspectCorner

Still waiting...
Messages
10,033
Reaction score
2,644
I think opponents would prefer to throw AWAY from Gilmore. That says plenty to me.
 
Top