Your perception of the odds that Dak wins a Super Bowl

Teams win superbowls not QBs. Lesser QBs have won a superbowl so it's never zero.

Injuries on other teams, things just fall into place, and or an extremely lucky streak could happen.

However it is extremely unlikely a QB taking up so much capital wins a superbowl nowadays. Unless you're generational talent like mahomes and have a smart FO making key FA signings
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
Dak Prescott will NEVER lead a team to a Super Bowl victory.

Regardless of how your team is built there will come a time when the QB has to step up and do something. Dak will find a way to fail.
Click to expand...
Where you been? Its been so quiet here without you coming into every Dak thread and threads non Dak related to speak about Dak.

In all seriousness. You all good?
 
This team has beat SB quality teams in the regular season. Its a matter of getting the offence and the defense playing well at the same time.

Seems it's always one or the other.
 
charron said:
The boys were a good team but I don't remember them being SB favorites. Could just be my view, i'll believe it when i see it.
Click to expand...
You said "gear up for a run"....not "sb favorites"

We kept a rookie, average nfl qb instead of a seasoned vet, one of the best of his day...out of supersttion.
Some said he he'd just get hurt anyway. Or throw The Interception.
Mkay. Their right to not put our best qb in to finish up the season.
 
I think you about nailed it. It would be lower for me except the NFC QB play is historically bad other than Hurts.
 
SteveTheCowboy said:
You said "gear up for a run"....not "sb favorites"

We kept a rookie, average nfl qb instead of a seasoned vet, one of the best of his day...out of supersttion.
Some said he he'd just get hurt anyway. Or throw The Interception.
Mkay. Their right to not put our best qb in to finish up the season.
Click to expand...
I agree they had a good team, a playoff calibre team but they didn't build a team to compete at the SB level. Even now no matter how well we draft i can't say they are bound to a SB with question marks in all 3 phases of the game. I can say they have a good shot to make the playoffs but that's about it.
 
....I'm still going with at least 70%. I feel Boy Wonder and MM we're not on same page all along.

MM should have stepped in last year at some point. Especially in post season. Huge gaffe..
 
Probably the same odds as anyone not named Burrow or Mahomes...Philly kinda looking like the Rams except they didnt win the hardware before the abandon ship siren sang.
 
Last edited:
charron said:
I agree they had a good team, a playoff calibre team but they didn't build a team to compete at the SB level. Even now no matter how well we draft i can't say they are bound to a SB with question marks in all 3 phases of the game. I can say they have a good shot to make the playoffs but that's about it.
Click to expand...
WE had a stud line ....vet wr and te....a 4th overall pick stud rb. If that aint building to make a run i dunno what is. Trade for rodgers?
 
This FO gave Dak an all pro line, stability with coaching and no competition, gave Dak a top 5 defense that produced multiple TOs, but we going to say it’s the FO..

You Dak fanboy always try and slide excuses in there…. Last year it was Amari gives up on routes and sucks, this year it’s the FO fault for gettin rid of Amari..

Everything to absolve Dak.. I will say one thing though, that FO made Dak their starting QB, so I guess they are right, it’s in large part the FO fault..

I mean Cooper Rush was winning with this team and all the Dak fanboys were saying the roster was carrying him. What happened to that excuse?
 
It depends if Dak can put 3 or 4 good games together against very good opponents. The teams he will face in the playoffs will have good to very good defenses. I personally do not think he can play 3 good games in a row against quality opponents. He will lay an egg in their somewhere.
 
With the addition of Cooks and Gilmore the odds have gotten better. If they get a starting DT and a stud TE in the draft it gets even better
 
SteveTheCowboy said:
You said "gear up for a run"....not "sb favorites"

We kept a rookie, average nfl qb instead of a seasoned vet, one of the best of his day...out of supersttion.
Some said he he'd just get hurt anyway. Or throw The Interception.
Mkay. Their right to not put our best qb in to finish up the season.
Click to expand...
Romo lost the team at that point. Romo knew it too. Even the veterans turned on him. Never thought Witten would ride with Dak over Romo but he saw it too.
 
khiladi said:
This FO gave Dak an all pro line, stability with coaching and no competition, gave Dak a top 5 defense that produced multiple TOs, but we going to say it’s the FO..

You Dak fanboy always try and slide excuses in there…. Last year it was Amari gives up on routes and sucks, this year it’s the FO fault for gettin rid of Amari..

Everything to absolve Dak.. I will say one thing though, that FO made Dak their starting QB, so I guess they are right, it’s in large part the FO fault..

I mean Cooper Rush was winning with this team and all the Dak fanboys were saying the roster was carrying him. What happened to that excuse?
Click to expand...
Last time we saw Cooper Rush he had one of the worst games of the season by a quarterback.You guys gloss over that lol.
 
SteveTheCowboy said:
WE had a stud line ....vet wr and te....a 4th overall pick stud rb. If that aint building to make a run i dunno what is. Trade for rodgers?
Click to expand...
Team sport. Defense was ok but had many issues that didn't get addressed. No one looked at that roster and thought man they are ready for a run, except blind homers. Most looked at that offense assuming Romo would play and said that should be a legit offense. But no objective person really thought man this team is going all out for a SB, they weren't gearing up for a run. They had a good offense on paper that would take the ball out the QB hands and you better hope you didn't have to lean to much on defense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 133 more.
Total: 4,949 (members: 233, guests: 4,716)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,268
Messages
13,801,786
Members
23,776
Latest member
saturdaysarebetter
Back
Top