aria
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,543
- Reaction score
- 16,793
Volume vs efficiency is the biggest argument I'd make against this list.
Looking it up, the most heavily used backs in the league this year were Zeke, Barkley, McCaffrey, Gurley, Joe Mixon, David Johnson, Joe Mixon, and Kamara. According to the PFF article, they ranked #35, #8, #26, #33, not listed, not listed (both outside the top 10) and #31 in that order. So we all know Saquon's a beast, but otherwise that's 6/7 guys outside the top 10 and at least 4/7 outside the top 30.
And that correlation makes sense. More heavily used backs are pretty much by definition going to get more carries in sub-optimal situations. An example would be a 3rd and 1 into a loaded box or on the goal line, where they don't really have a prayer of breaking a tackle. Or in clock-killing situations, where they're not even trying to break a tackle, they're just trying to hang on to the ball. A 2 yard rush in any of those situations kills your per-touch efficiency stats, but helps your team win football games.
The fact that Zeke was able to churn out 4.7 YPC on the heaviest workload in the league, with a middling passing game, an injured OL, and an inept OC all working against him speaks more to his talent than his PFF grade does for me.
Saquon had many, many more receptions than Zeke so it could be argued he actually had a higher workload and our injured O line was still light years better then the Giants starting O line. They also had a middling passing game since Odiva was out a good portion of the season.