Wolverine
Zimmer Hater
- Messages
- 2,467
- Reaction score
- 0
Silverstar said:Players make all the difference and we simply didn't have the right players at LB for the 3-4
Mike Zimmer excuse #73549871032947120970913241907143247098132740
Silverstar said:Players make all the difference and we simply didn't have the right players at LB for the 3-4
Wolverine said:Mike Zimmer excuse #73549871032947120970913241907143247098132740
Murph80 said:Who taught Zimmer this new 3-4 defense this off season?
This is not the defense he has always coached.
We even had players playing this D for the first time ever
watertown said:I have said this a thousand times but some of you just refuse to listen, it is not Zimmer,s fault. The HC can overrule him at any time so why would Bill the master you guys think he is not step in......please one of you morons please explain this to me please
texastwister said:Lets see Zimmer is the defensive Cord but its not his fault. Ok.....
Zimmers passive defensive schemes are the HC idea.Ok....
The last 4 HC all had the same passive defensive scheme. Ok....
Yeh youre right its not Zimmer scheme or his fault at all
Wolverine said:If Mike Zimmer was the Steelers DC the Steelers woulda lost big today. Manning woulda been good for at least 400 yards and 5 TDs.
I look at how the Steelers DC had a game plan for the Colts and pressured Manning all day and I just shake my head wonderin *** this team is doin wastin time with that moron Zimmer. Fire him now and just get Capers here.
Capers would give us a D like the Steelers have. Mike Zimmer SUCKS!
texastwister said:Lets see Zimmer is the defensive Cord but its not his fault. Ok.....
Zimmers passive defensive schemes are the HC idea.Ok....
The last 4 HC all had the same passive defensive scheme. Ok....
Yeh youre right its not Zimmer scheme or his fault at all
junk said:Zim is a DC coaching a defense that he has never coached before because the head coach mandated it.
Isn't this BP's defense? Shouldn't he have showed him some of these "aggressive" defensive schemes?
You are fooling yourself if you think BP just said "Learn and implement the 3-4" and kept his fingers off it.
Remember the "zero" blitz? How is that anything but aggressive? Let's send both our safeties on the blitz and leave our corners in man coverage without deep help. Thats so wussy.
Wolverine said:Please save the excuse for the Zimmer can do no wrong club. More and more people are seein what a joke Mike Zimmer really is.
junk said:. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see Zim being the HC after BP leaves.
I want to know how he can be at fault when he was forced to coach a defensive scheme he knew nothing about.
Unless he gets a HC gig, I don't think he is going anywhere.
blindzebra said:I'm still waiting for one basher with an intelligent, logical post.
This wait will last forever.
Zimmer can't do it, we really need to make a change. we dont have anything creative, its the most basic defense ever, and we should have a lot more turnovers if we had blitz packages like pittsburgh.Cbz40 said:Yes it is amazing.....why our D can't put together a few blitz packages that work. It just boggles my old brain cells.
junk said:Zim is a DC coaching a defense that he has never coached before because the head coach mandated it.
Isn't this BP's defense? Shouldn't he have showed him some of these "aggressive" defensive schemes?
You are fooling yourself if you think BP just said "Learn and implement the 3-4" and kept his fingers off it.
Remember the "zero" blitz? How is that anything but aggressive? Let's send both our safeties on the blitz and leave our corners in man coverage without deep help. Thats so wussy.
texastwister said:For those of you that watched the Steelers game and will watch the Bears game-Can you see the difference in those 2 defense compared too Dallas?
These defenses are aggresive and cause turnovers unlike Zimmers defense
Maybe you should look at the Carolina-Bears game and see how Steve Smith just about beat the Bears by him self before you start wishing Zimmer was gone