Whether you like Dak or not

Yep, this is a front office philosophy that predates Dak and likely will continue after him, considering the Stephen Jones will be running the team. As has been written multiple times, it goes back to overpaying Brandon Carr and him being a good but not great player. Carr was kind of the last straw for the staff, other players like Marco Riviera contributed to the philosophy change.

Dak's $90 million for this year probably wasn't included because we don't know what his actual hit will be. His contract was set up for the base to be restructured this year, creating quite a bit of cap space.
It's sad that a free agent signing in 2012 still has them shook, so they just sit there with the proverbial bat on their shoulder afraid to swing because they might strike out, hoping for a walk. The real issue is that no GM should still be in place to suffer from ptsd of a signing in 2012.
 
If they show Dak's fragility in needing pretty everything to go right (whilst commanding elite money), then yes they are albatrosses.

The fact that everyone of them has exceeded Daks post season achievements is immaterial.

Should never give a 30+ year old such a high CAP%, especially if he isn't the difference maker.
Suppose they give him what Hurts has?
 
This is why I don't understand fans saying Dak's contract is holding them back from signing free agents. Hell, I'll be to say, like many others, Dak isn't worth $60M but his contract has little or no impact on our free agent signing. That's on Jerry and Stephen.........using Dak's contract as collateral for their agenda.
Yup. And this time we'll do nothing because of Parsons.
 
The relevant part of the analysis is the years that the Joneses have sat on their hands and not added any meaningful free agents to this roster. WHEN WILL THE FUTURE BE NOW IN DALLAS like it is in SF, Philly, Detroit and KC to name a few. We've been planning on the future for 20 years or so, the Joneses probably have the perfect plan in place for the 2030 season....but in 2030 they'll be planning for 2035.....and then in 2035........
The future hasn't been less now for a long time. We're about to increase our yearly outlay to Dak 30mil per year over the most we've paid him prior, which was last year.

The future is looking dismal with 10% less cap to work with compared to Dak's worst prior cap hit, and Dak coming off his worst season that culminated in a season ending injury.

I see a lot of getting worse in our near future.
 


His contract has never been the albatross that the Joneses made it out to be. We need to keep the pressure on the real source of the problem, the Joneses.

We don't participate in free agency bc we don't have the expertise in the building to know who fits. So, even if SJ wasn't so dam conservative managing the cap, we don't know who to go get.
 
Jalen Hurts cap hits after signing his 5 years 250 million dollar contract:

2023 6.1 million
2024 13.5 million
2025 21.8 million

GMs that care about winning NOW instead of planning for the 2030 season don't care about pushing money down the road because they're trying to get the most talent on the team today. Fans shouldn't care either, if we were so good at looking, worrying and planning for the future then in 2020 we should have had the best plan in the NFL for the 2024 season.
I would also add that they manage the big salaries of Hurts, Brown, Dickerson, Johnson, Smith, Maleita and Goedert.......in Dallas its a combination of overpaying 1 above average Qb, like he's elite, AND not knowing how to work the cap.....both can be true
 
Dak is and always will be the problem regardless of his cap hit. He's a non mobile QB with a weak mind on the field. Looks like a deer in headlights when opposing D gets tough. Has to have all-pros around him to look mediocre at best. Doesn't lift up players or make them better. Every year Romo was QB he'd have a no named WR come in and Romo would make him look pro-bowl level. Dak isn't able to do this because he's inaccurate and lacks the mechanics to be able to thrive in a pass heavy offense. Can't wait till we get rid of him.
 
It's sad that a free agent signing in 2012 still has them shook, so they just sit there with the proverbial bat on their shoulder afraid to swing because they might strike out, hoping for a walk. The real issue is that no GM should still be in place to suffer from ptsd of a signing in 2012.
Well, they have thought the decision they made after 2012 was the right one. They've been defending that strategy ever since even though it has not resulted in ultimate success. Things like the team going 12-5 three years in a row make them go, "See, we're doing it the right way ... all these teams signing expensive free agents are going to fall apart any day now!"
 
Suppose they give him what Hurts has?
Impossible, as Hurts is highly likely to get another contract, so Phill can heavily restructure ......Dak took the shorter 4 year option (and then put up league average stats)....can you appreciate the difference in how both teams can manipulate those two contracts, especially as Dak's CAP hits actually average out to 70m per (due to the restructuring of the last contract).
 
Impossible, as Hurts is highly likely to get another contract, so Phill can heavily restructure ......Dak took the shorter 4 year option (and then put up league average stats)....can you appreciate the difference in how both teams can manipulate those two contracts, especially as Dak's CAP hits actually average out to 70m per (due to the restructuring of the last contract).
You mean Dak fought for the shorter option. He absolutely refused to do a 5 year deal.
 
You mean Dak fought for the shorter option. He absolutely refused to do a 5 year deal.
As per the previous contract, I thought it was heavily suggested that Dak wanted the short term so he could re-enter free agency.
 
Impossible, as Hurts is highly likely to get another contract, so Phill can heavily restructure ......Dak took the shorter 4 year option (and then put up league average stats)....can you appreciate the difference in how both teams can manipulate those two contracts, especially as Dak's CAP hits actually average out to 70m per (due to the restructuring of the last contract).
There is no restructure required with Hurts' contract. His salary never exceeds $1.4 million in any given year. What they did with Hurts is build in option bonuses for each year he is under contract. This year he gets a $41 million option bonus which the spread out over 5 years. Next year he gets another $50 million option bonus which is also spread out over 5 years. The same thing is true in 2027 and 2028. In a way the Eagles built in restructure by giving him bonuses every year instead of salary then converting it to bonuses later.

The problem for the Eagles, is what happens if they do not re-sign Hurts after the 2028 season? In that case all of that pro-rated bonus money accelerates into 2029, about $97 million. And on top of that, they have another $81 million of the same time of pro-rated bonuses for other players also in 2029. It is possible that the Eagles would have $178 million in pro-rated bonus money hitting their CAP for players they no longer have on their roster.

But they have another $243 million of this hitting their CAP in 2025 through 2028.

They can avoid some of this problem by releasing the players before their option bonuses are to be paid. And I suspect they will. But if Hurts plays well, how do they release him? It is true they can extend him in 2028 like Dallas did with Dak. That would allow them to shave something like $60 million off the 2029 number not counting whatever they add in the new contract, which I would assume would include a signing bonus.
 
I think 2025 is a huge year for Dak. If he repeats his poor performance of 2024, it would be a sign he is slipping and no longer the guy be the franchise QB. If he gets injured again, it is the same problem. This is why I would not restructure his deal in 2023. The CAP hit is enormous but keeps the problem manageable next year and the year after should the Cowboys decide to move on from Dak after 2025 or 2026. I would definitely want him off the books as much as possible by 2027.
 
Dak is paid because he saved Jerry from being cancelled in 2017. Prescott took a bullet for our owner.
 
I think 2025 is a huge year for Dak. If he repeats his poor performance of 2024, it would be a sign he is slipping and no longer the guy be the franchise QB. If he gets injured again, it is the same problem. This is why I would not restructure his deal in 2023. The CAP hit is enormous but keeps the problem manageable next year and the year after should the Cowboys decide to move on from Dak after 2025 or 2026. I would definitely want him off the books as much as possible by 2027.
I fully expect this team to not make the playoffs in 2025. I do not agree that restructuring his deal is the way to go. Instead take the hit for a single year and move on from this guy in 2026 - restructuring is only going to keep pushing the years down the road which will further handicap what they can do.
 
I think 2025 is a huge year for Dak. If he repeats his poor performance of 2024, it would be a sign he is slipping and no longer the guy be the franchise QB. If he gets injured again, it is the same problem. This is why I would not restructure his deal in 2023. The CAP hit is enormous but keeps the problem manageable next year and the year after should the Cowboys decide to move on from Dak after 2025 or 2026. I would definitely want him off the books as much as possible by 2027.
That should be 2025 not 2023.
 
We don't like Dak because of many things. MANY.

Any lack of spending in FA because of him isn't close to the first few reasons why.
I hear this so much, but why should we? We'd just be forcing money down the road for what? We're not in a place where that money would do much. I'd rather eat various hits now and have a clean slate in a few years.
 
Back
Top