Sydla
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 60,156
- Reaction score
- 92,037
You are using hyperbole to rationalize your HATE agenda.
No one SAID EVER...Zeke alone gets us a Super Bowl...so cut the crap.
So Dak has a couple "good" years and you say "pay the man".
2 time rushing champ and as mentioned 3 straight assured if it wasn't for Jerry's feud with GODell. Not gonna pay THAT man?
You think Dak would have had an awesome rookie year and a decent 3 year run without zeke?...baloney.
You OF COURSE need a good QB to be a good offense, regardless of RB. You OF COURSE need a solid starting O-line to have a good offense, regardless of QB or RB. . Of COURSE some players have an off few games or so. You dont; ditch one of the best players at his position because of a coupel fd up games and entire *** up offseason and season. Unless you have hate and jealousy in your heart. Or (falsely) thinking you are some kind of omnipresent expert and what you say goes.
So...what are you mad about? The money? Zeke's playboy lifestyle?
This is where you are making a mistake. I’ve been clear on this for years. I don’t have an issue with Elliott specifically.
I am anti-pay your TB a crap ton of money. I would have the same issues if it was another TB we handed a 90 million contract to. The fact Elliott hasn’t played well recently just makes it clear why overpaying for a TB is a mistake.
You guys often miss the point by trying to make this a hate thing with Elliott when, in fact, most who have an issue with him is more about the TB position overall and overpaying for it.
PS - QBs are infinitely more important to a team’s success than a TB. Now I have my questions about Dak and whether 40 million a year makes sense, but strictly from positional value, yes, you pay for good QBs you don’t pay big money to TBs.
Last edited: