Twitter: Last player off the field

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
75,731
Reaction score
70,089
Assuming stuff makes for great internet discussions.
I'm suppose to believe this guy is going to Youtube and searching for Cowboys highlights....passes up the highlights from the NFL's channel and only going to the creators channel to find some condescend version of highlights that are in 480p lol.....I Guess lol...y'all can believe that crap if y'all want lol.
 

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,100
Reaction score
13,528
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I'm suppose to believe this guy is going to Youtube and searching for Cowboys highlights....passes up the highlights from the NFL's channel and only going to the creators channel to find some condescend version of highlights that are in 480p lol.....I Guess lol...y'all can believe that crap if y'all want lol.
Until he says otherwise....I'm not saying what he's doing. But I'm not in it just to argue either.
 

Cowboy4ever

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,000
Reaction score
4,217
I'm suppose to believe this guy is going to Youtube and searching for Cowboys highlights....passes up the highlights from the NFL's channel and only going to the creators channel to find some condescend version of highlights that are in 480p lol.....I Guess lol...y'all can believe that crap if y'all want lol.

The bigger question is why does it matter. There are a million ways to get information these days. Just because someone chooses a different method than you would or like, it doesn't negate their ability to form an opinion or express their opinion.
 

Vtwin

Safety third
Messages
8,167
Reaction score
11,133
Well if you question whether watching the games matter in forming an opinion about the QB then you warrant the remark.
I didn't question that, Rocky.

I questioned the eye test detractors questioning the guy using stats to support his argument. It seems a tad hypocritical.
 

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
41,826
Reaction score
41,682
It's called being a husband and father first nimrod.....apparently your priorities are screwed up to judge someone because they do not sit on their *** for 3+ hours like you and your click.
Man, you just need to quit while you can still climb out of that hole.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,739
Reaction score
18,005
When I look at whether it is a good team or not, I first look at - Did they make the playoffs. Then I look at their record. There are some good teams that don't make the playoffs and the opposite is true to, some bad teams can make the playoffs as well, like the WFT last year - even though they were a playoff team, it would be a stretch to call them good. So counting wins against Good teams can be very subjective. All I really know is that after his rookie year, he hasn't been as good against the better teams in the NFL. Everyone can prob site 100 reasons why that is but the bottom line is, he got paid to be elite. He needs to play better when it matters than he has in the past. And for some fans to deny that his play has not been an issue at times (not the only issue but an issue just the same) is living in fantasyland.
I don't disagree. that's why I posted the records against winning teams for the other QBs....there is only 4 active ones that have a winning record and Brady at 74-47 is just insane and speaks to how good he is. not surprisingly they all have great head coaches...in Bilicheck, Harbaugh, Reid and Carroll that have great in game management skills.....
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,739
Reaction score
18,005
Just curious, which 2 would you count in 2019.. I can see the Rams in some way but who is the other?

Giants x 2
Washington X 2
Philly 1
Detroit
Rams
Miami

Those were the teams we beat in 2019 - No one in our division could have been considered good that year. My guess is you saying Philly but that's a stretch IMO
Philly....

its not a stretch. a playoff team and 9-7.

like I said, people can get into the argument of were they good or not and it will get to 150 pages...you can do the same for all other QBs and same argument........
 

Cowboy4ever

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,000
Reaction score
4,217
Philly....

its not a stretch. a playoff team and 9-7.

like I said, people can get into the argument of were they good or not and it will get to 150 pages...you can do the same for all other QBs and same argument........

I thought that is where you were at. I would disagree but that's just my opinion. they were 6-6 when we played them and beat them making them 6-7 and all but finished, then they went on the 3 game winning streak while we fell apart.
 

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,747
Reaction score
34,546
So to you someone that watches highlights or recaps instead of watching 3+ hours of a game can't provide stats and opinions?

Geez, sure they can provide opinions but those opinions are weak, and based on a partial view of the overall picture. Unbelievable that you read a couple stats, watch highlights and then PRETEND to know what the hell you are talking about.


EDIT: you know what, I'm sorry. I didn't have to be rude about it. I apologize for that much. I do believe there is a lot more to a game than highlights and boxscores though. I'm also tired of politics and the divide and conquer mentality. We should all want the same things, but it gets twisted by politicians imo.
 
Last edited:

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
41,826
Reaction score
41,682
I didn't question that, Rocky.

I questioned the eye test detractors questioning the guy using stats to support his argument. It seems a tad hypocritical.
Well, I'm not an eye test detractor or a stats only detractor. LOL, I'm just saying anyone who doesn't even watch the games and comes here crapping on Dak has some issues and at the least cannot be taken seriously about anything he says.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top