Rule on arm moving forward

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,524
Reaction score
94,599
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
And the location of his arm is irrelevant. That's fan nonsense. It only matters if the arm's going forward in a throwing motion. It was, so no fumble.

Embarrassing thread.
I'm pretty sure @Jenky was being facetious, but you're right, it's an embarrassing thread. I'm glad I don't watch games in public with some of these people.
 

Big_C_KU

Well-Known Member
Messages
988
Reaction score
1,107
All I know is at some point this season a similar play will involve Dak and it will be ruled a fumble and upheld by NY.
 

ESisback

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
14,026
Just on common sense, it was clear that that ball was in his hand firmly and was knocked out before he released it as part of a throw. The arm was well behind the head.

I don't get that rule at all. Does someone want to explain why that SHOULD be a forward pass?
In the “old days”, that was a fumble. Now, incomplete pass. The irony? Had that been Dak, we all KNOW what the call would have been. Well, except for Trolls, ABD’s, and scoffing “realists”…
 

BrassCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,733
Reaction score
3,320
Yeah, arm was moving forward so it was a pass and for me, I think they should keep the rule like it is. You invite another round of interpretive bs if you confuse it with refs interpretation of what is a pass and fumble.

Much like the crap we dealt with few years back when they try to define what was a catch and not a catch. No thank you
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,524
Reaction score
94,599
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Then what the hell constitutes an empty hand,or is this a 2021 rule change specifically? I mean if the rule says that it is the correct call, but it seems completely inconsistent with the empty hand standard.
Empty hand is when the QB loses the ball before his arm starts moving forward.
 

silvernblu

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,497
Reaction score
1,941
Yeah, arm was moving forward so it was a pass and for me, I think they should keep the rule like it is. You invite another round of interpretive bs if you confuse it with refs interpretation of what is a pass and fumble.

Much like the crap we dealt with few years back when they try to define what was a catch and not a catch. No thank you
You actually make my point. The Dez catch was obvious and the technicality of the rule was wrong. Hence they changed it.
 

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,949
Reaction score
16,252
And the location of his arm is irrelevant. That's fan nonsense. It only matters if the arm's going forward in a throwing motion. It was, so no fumble.

Embarrassing thread.
I'm pretty sure @Jenky was being facetious, but you're right, it's an embarrassing thread. I'm glad I don't watch games in public with some of these people.

Welcome to my world, you two.
 

ghst187

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,565
Reaction score
11,380
Just on common sense, it was clear that that ball was in his hand firmly and was knocked out before he released it as part of a throw. The arm was well behind the head.

I don't get that rule at all. Does someone want to explain why that SHOULD be a forward pass?

agree 100%. Just like parts of the catch rule, the roughing the QB rules, PI rules…they are terrible, don’t pass the common sense test, and make the league look like a joke. I don’t care that it was a Cowboy game and I know it was the right call per the current rule…but common sense says that’s a fumble as the QB hadn’t voluntarily released that football from his hand before it was knocked out, the fact his arm was going forward is irrelevant in common sense land
 

Adiba1977

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,910
Reaction score
3,713
agree 100%. Just like parts of the catch rule, the roughing the QB rules, PI rules…they are terrible, don’t pass the common sense test, and make the league look like a joke. I don’t care that it was a Cowboy game and I know it was the right call per the current rule…but common sense says that’s a fumble as the QB hadn’t voluntarily released that football from his hand before it was knocked out, the fact his arm was going forward is irrelevant in common sense land

exactly who cares if arm coming forward. Still have possession and ball knocked out fumble. If ball leaves your hand first then touched incomplete pass. Common sense
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,524
Reaction score
94,599
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
agree 100%. Just like parts of the catch rule, the roughing the QB rules, PI rules…they are terrible, don’t pass the common sense test, and make the league look like a joke. I don’t care that it was a Cowboy game and I know it was the right call per the current rule…but common sense says that’s a fumble as the QB hadn’t voluntarily released that football from his hand before it was knocked out, the fact his arm was going forward is irrelevant in common sense land
I understand your POV, but it's the least subjective way to define it and have consistency, and not give the officials more latitude to change games
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
The point I am trying to make is that you are absolutely correct based on any objective observation.

But you are wrong based on the rule.

Hence, the rule is bad.

Just like Dez’s “drop”
The rule doesn't apply here though, it shouldn't have. No matter what his arm did, the ball has to move forward for it to be a forward pass. Yes his arm moved forward, but the ball went backwards and was therefore a fumble.
 

ESisback

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
14,026
Best look here for folks that don't believe that the arm was going forward.

Hill-Arm2-R.gif
Yep! Arm going forward, incomplete. Good shot, correct call, I stand corrected.

I would, however, not bet on an identical call had that been Dak. The calls are consistently inconsistent:

Incomplete—Brady, Rodgers, Worthlessburger, Mahomes, etc.

Fumble—Dak, whomever QBs the Jets, Jags, Lions, Browns, Bears, etc.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,524
Reaction score
94,599
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
The rule doesn't apply here though, it shouldn't have. No matter what his arm did, the ball has to move forward for it to be a forward pass. Yes his arm moved forward, but the ball went backwards and was therefore a fumble.
The ball moved forward before being hit by DLaw. The arm and the ball were both moving forward when the ball was knocked out of his hand. The direction in which the ball was deflected is irrelevant, just as it would be in the case of a fumble.
 

nyc-cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,084
Reaction score
10,687
Yep! Arm going forward, incomplete. Good shot, correct call, I stand corrected.
Thank goodness - there is still hope for humanity.

How anyone can see that shot and not have the same reaction is beyond me.
 
Top