America's Cowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 33,592
- Reaction score
- 47,014
The crying from the Dak haters is ever increasing.
HIS TEAM is for sure yup TEAM but rams won and he threw a pick to end it so nopeGoing to multiple Superbowls gives you a pass.
Hell Jimmy g stats are terrible yet he's likely going to another Superbowl and he too will be given more leeway. If Daks wants the benefit of any doubt he needs to win a playoff game. True nobody does it by themselves but the excuses are over, he's had enough help on offense to get it done but hasn't.
HIS TEAM is for sure yup TEAM but rams won and he threw a pick to end it so nope
Who cares.Okay Sparky! So who replaces him next season? I'm waiting.
If Dak had the same stats and the team had 14 less penalties... do you think we would have won that game?True but the point remains. His stats still suck but he's gone farther than Dak who collects stats but can't win a playoff game. 2 opposites
True but the point remains. His stats still suck but he's gone farther than Dak who collects stats but can't win a playoff game. 2 opposites
If Dak had the same stats and the team had 14 less penalties... do you think we would have won that game?
The Niners were able to win because of running game and defense. People think if you pay for a qb then the rest of the roster doesn't matter. Garropollo also the highest paid qb in the league when he signed his deal. Touting the Niners success and attributing it to Garropollo while saying the Cowboys shouldn't have paid Dak doesn't make sense to me.
Since you didn't actually answer the question, I can only assume your real answer would contradict your prior statements.Lot of ifs many teams can say the same thing lot of IFS
Since you didn't actually answer the question, I can only assume your real answer would contradict your prior statements.
Is there any way we can restructure where it changes the team he plays for?
So you soley blame a qb for not overcoming 14 penalties in a game? Interesting.To answer your fantasy question yeah if everything lined up that could possibly still win a game but everything didn't line up that still loses he had the weapons to advance he couldn't get the job done those are the facts
its pushing money into the future..... almost every team does that and every team has dead cap money they deal with every year.....its the way of NFL...I wouldn't worry so much about something that hasn't happened and will not happen for a few years.Kick that can!
(He's presently scheduled for "zero'' salary in the final year of his contract, when he's 33. This move will change that.)
‘Change that’. As in add even more to the $13.2 million they will already be paying in 2025 to not even have him under contract.
The team just digs those holes deeper and deeper.
depends on how much dead cap you can tolerate...the longer into the contract, the lesser the impactSooooo does this mean we can cut him in a couple years?
you assume Brady would have come here....that would be the wrong assumption.Too late for that.
I suggested getting Tom Brady on a 2 year deal and letting Dak walk.. We’d be sitting nice right now.
I don’t know what this team is going to do really lol. They need a Super team to compete with all these juggernaut QBs. Luckily a lot of them play in the AFC.
they went through a rough year to end up with top 5 pick.....they had tons of injuries.The 49's paid Jimmy G, managed to get a SB appearance out of him then drafted his replacement after the third year of his five year contract. He very likely won't finish that original five year deal with the 49's.
Rams... Goff.... very similar.
We do things different here in big D.
that would be a mistakeill bet heavily that Amari is back and Schultz is gone