Dre11
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,686
- Reaction score
- 11,450
The Cowboys with Dak was 11-6 this year.
Do you research anything at all before you type?
Do you research, Dak had 16 turnovers not 24 .we can play this game all night.
The Cowboys with Dak was 11-6 this year.
Do you research anything at all before you type?
Ya might wanna go back and read my post.Do you research, Dak had 16 turnovers not 24 .we can play this game all night.
If you see Dak for what he is your a hater. If you love Dak for whatever reason you can't stand anything that doesn't fit the love fest narrative. This board is just too funny.
Ya might wanna go back and read my post.
I said Dak had 24 combined fumbles and INT.
Prove that wrong.
This was the next post:And in the next post called them turnovers.
Did you not?
Proven wrong...lol
Yes, because Dak's 300 more passing yards was much more impactful than Rodgers and his 17 less INTs and fumbles.
Do you have no shame at all?
This was the next post:
This in reference to the fumbles/int combined
You really have no shame, do ya?
Yes, I posted that, but you notice that I did not bring up any numbers, right? Because the numbers I posted are correct, but not all the fumbles count as turnovers. That's why I worded it "INTS and fumbles" instead of "turnovers"."Are the turnovers comparable? Are turnovers not really important?"
If so I would LOVEEEEE to see you compare them.
DID YOU NOT POST THIS...LOL
THE SHANE IS ON YOU...LOL
Yes, I posted that, but you notice that I did not bring up any numbers, right? Because the numbers I posted are correct, but not all the fumbles count as turnovers. That's why I worded it "INTS and fumbles" instead of "turnovers".
I am calculated in what I say. I think before I type. Man, I am good aren't I? Always a few steps ahead.
Show me where I mentioned those numbers and turnovers in the same post.You called them turnovers, you were referring to the post involving the numbers you posted, gtfoh
Backtracking doesn't look good on you...lol
All the data posted show a lot of variability -- it's not just Dak. I'm not sure I would put much stock in the direction the line happens to be pointing as a Dak-specific indicator of anything.An unknown?
He has 80k followers and is a contributor for The Athletic. What's your credentials for all the horrible memes you post?
Also, If you think he's put out false numbers then prove them wrong.
Show me where I mentioned those numbers and turnovers in the same post.
If you can't then you have to delete your account. Deal?
Oh look! An original thread concept, completely different angles.
Nope, JK, it's the same lame BS and "fans" pissing on a player of the team they're allegedly a "fan" of.
Makes so much sense! Time well spent!
It doesn't count because Cooper Rush started a game and could win at the same rate like Andy DaltonLol numbers are numbers. How about #1 offense led by Dak.
And he’ll keep creating them inciting your responses if y’all don’t stop feeding him. Ignore them and they’ll all fall off the front page quickly,The op got 3 thread on the first page. They all are on the qb....lol
Nope....I LOVE exposing Dak Haters underbelly....so softAnd he’ll keep creating them inciting your responses if y’all don’t stop feeding him.
Ignore them and they’ll all fall off the front page quickly,
They are already exposed. The response or taking the bait means the troll wins.Nope....I LOVE exposing Dak Haters underbelly....so soft
Nope....Real Dallas Cowboys fans win. 12 - 6 with Division Title after 2020 year is a trend in the right direction.They are already exposed. The response or taking the bait means the troll wins.