If it's about the QB why is SF getting all this hype over Dallas?

Qb's, D, OLine. That's the order of importance.

Absolutely no one is saying all it takes is a QB.
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
Ya'll fallen for it again this year is a sight to see.

San Fran bullied us last year and will do it again if we play them.

It doesn't matter who their QB is because our QB won't perform against their defense. It's really that simple.
Click to expand...
Corky in NO WAY had us ready to play SF last year....when I saw SF dancing around pre-game with their own jam box in the tunnel, and us looking scared in ours, I thought "Oh S....this is not gonna turn out good"....it didn't, and Corky should have been fired.
 
I think it's because at this point Dak's a known entity as someone who paves his pants under pressure. Not that he's worse per se than Purdy, which is kind of ridiculous.
 
pacy said:
I would say the Niners might be the only exception. On this team you do not need a good QB to be successful.
Click to expand...
really?, because trey crashed and burned early bnefore his injury, and SF got Lucky they didn't trade JG because they would be in bad shape now had Trey been starting or JG gone and purdy their QB all season.

if it's not important why the giant REACH and all those Draft picks for Trey lance??. Come on man. its still important and they wanted to upgrade from JG, lets keep it real lie the rams they still need QB to get them far in the payoff and to a SB championship. If its plug and play, why all the attention they have paid top that position claiming that al they are missing much like the rams moving on from Goff even though they went to a SB with him.

so that straight nonsense, that might get them through some RS games(like we did with Rush, that wasnt going to last long) with Purdy but no way he doesn't became exposed against great pass rush teams in the Playoffs. IDC how much they run, they will need to pass, if QB was unimportant why not run the wild cat from now on..:):facepalm::muttley::rolleyes:.
 
GMO415 said:
Yes, there are some power ranking that has Dallas as high as #2, behind the iggles. Most place SF above Dallas, which makes no sense. These analyst keep saying "without a QB, you're not going anywhere."

So, I'm to believe a rookie QB who barley was drafted is better than a Pro Bowl QB who was in the discussion for MVP last year? Really?

There is far too much biasness towards Dallas. The media blames it on Dallas never making it far into the playoffs for the past 27 years. Newsflash! This is an entirely different team! Other teams are not held to this standard.....unbelievable.
Click to expand...
Prescot has yet to prove that he can carry a team with his arm against teams like the 9ers & turds and until he does the Boys aren't going to get the respect that Cowboy Nation thinks they deserve!
 
blueblood70 said:
really?, because trey crashed and burned early bnefore his injury, and SF got Lucky they didn't trade JG because they would be in bad shape now had Trey been starting or JG gone and purdy their QB all season.

if it's not important why the giant REACH and all those Draft picks for Trey lance??. Come on man. its still important and they wanted to upgrade from JG, lets keep it real lie the rams they still need QB to get them far in the payoff and to a SB championship. If its plug and play, why all the attention they have paid top that position claiming that al they are missing much like the rams moving on from Goff even though they went to a SB with him.

so that straight nonsense, that might get them through some RS games(like we did with Rush, that wasnt going to last long) with Purdy but no way he doesn't became exposed against great pass rush teams in the Playoffs. IDC how much they run, they will need to pass, if QB was unimportant why not run the wild cat from now on..:):facepalm::muttley::rolleyes:.
Click to expand...

I didn't say that QB is unimportant. I just pointed out that how this Niners team is structured you don't necessary need a good QB on that team to be successful.
 
GMO415 said:
Yes, there are some power ranking that has Dallas as high as #2, behind the iggles. Most place SF above Dallas, which makes no sense. These analyst keep saying "without a QB, you're not going anywhere."

So, I'm to believe a rookie QB who barley was drafted is better than a Pro Bowl QB who was in the discussion for MVP last year? Really?

There is far too much biasness towards Dallas. The media blames it on Dallas never making it far into the playoffs for the past 27 years. Newsflash! This is an entirely different team! Other teams are not held to this standard.....unbelievable.
Click to expand...


Well the 49ers have a real offensive coordinator. We have Kellen Moore.... the dumbest offensive coordinator in the NFL. KM is at best, a junior college level offensive coordinator.
 
They’re expecting Jimmy G back for the playoffs now. And just picked up Baker Mayfield. I followed Purdy at Iowa State . He’s not bad.

Their defense is that good. And have Star talent at key positions on offense. I might rank then above Egirls.

SF
Phil
Dal
 
It’s not all about the QB but good luck winning a championship with a rookie QB. I don’t see anyone hyping the 49ers right now. Everyone is waiting to see how they perform the next few weeks with Brock Purdy at QB.
 
KJJ said:
It’s not all about the QB but good luck winning a championship with a rookie QB. I don’t see anyone hyping the 49ers right now. Everyone is waiting to see how they perform the next few weeks with Brock Purdy at QB.
Click to expand...

Expect Tampa Bay to throw a lot of different things at Purdy and bring different pressure packages at him.
 
I think the 49ers are going to have some problems with Purdy as their QB. Once a couple of games of film are on him.

Their oline, run game, and defense are going to have to play perfect in order to go far.
 
Diehardblues said:
They’re expecting Jimmy G back for the playoffs now. And just picked up Baker Mayfield. I followed Purdy at Iowa State . He’s not bad.

Their defense is that good. And have Star talent at key positions on offense. I might rank then above Egirls.

SF
Phil
Dal
Click to expand...

Mayfield is with the Rams, Rams are out of it
 
The NFL and some of the Cowboys fanbase knows Dak's limitations.
We "may" have enough talent to over come them.
That's my hope anyway
 
GMO415 said:
Yes, there are some power ranking that has Dallas as high as #2, behind the iggles. Most place SF above Dallas, which makes no sense. These analyst keep saying "without a QB, you're not going anywhere."

So, I'm to believe a rookie QB who barley was drafted is better than a Pro Bowl QB who was in the discussion for MVP last year? Really?

There is far too much biasness towards Dallas. The media blames it on Dallas never making it far into the playoffs for the past 27 years. Newsflash! This is an entirely different team! Other teams are not held to this standard.....unbelievable.
Click to expand...
It’s all about the team!
 
the 49ers got embarassed by the chiefs with jimmy G and all the guys there healthy...imagine a chiefs vs 49ers with mr irrelevant, 49ers are barely a top5 NFC team right now. vikes are head for sure. and the seahags find ways to beat them!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 5 more.
Total: 7,976 (members: 105, guests: 7,871)
Robots: 1,152

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,634
Messages
14,548,974
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top