Only 4 teams have scored more points than the Cowboys

Redsfan_83 said:
guess it depends upon what the ultimate goal is of your fandom. If it's mediocrity and successful regular seasons, then you have what you want. If it's bragging rights with your buddies, a championship t-shirt, and the falling on their sword journalists out there who feast on this mediocrity...then you want more
Click to expand...
I like the whole thing. It's a great time to be a Cowboy fan.
 
rambo2 said:
The we haven't done anything in 28 years. The we can't have nice things. The we will never win with Dak. The we need a real gm. The Jerry is a moron. The winning is not in Dak's DNA. It's all bs to me. It's a bunch of cry babies. It's weird to me when the team is so good. They lost 1 game. Enjoy the ride.
Click to expand...
Ok, Stuart Smalley. Whatever gets you through your day.
 
Redsfan_83 said:
Missing OL is a fact that this time has fought for years, nothing different this year. Why are we making excuses for pathetic play on both sides of the ball against Arizona? Nobody in this argument has even mentioned the Diggs injury and how it affected our defense mentally and physically. You can call somebody that isn't a cheerleader a hater all you want, but if you can't be an objective fan of a team than don't. All you guys want to give our offense a pass to start this season, and no pass is to be provided. We won our first 2 because of our D, and didn't Zona only run 50 some odd plays? We got bit bad on big plays, that was our downfall ....if you aren't concerned about our offense right now, then I have no words
Click to expand...
i'm not reading past that ridiculous first line, Never missing 3 1st round pro bowlers in the same game...OH right, right those were typically LOSSES and would be for most teams when the defense is atrocious and the penalties out of line. do you need to be hit by a bus to realize how bad a defensive effort tat was againt that lack of talent?? apparently so go sell that redicluaos blame of the offsne to sportys isdiot, im not one..

we lost the game because the d was horrible TOP was robbed and penaltys took any hope of comeback away specially the one that was picked up on michael Gallup.. that was a clear pass interference call and it was clear the refs had an agenda... you want to know what we also fought fight not being able to stop the run and stop a mobile Qback, even if there are no name brand players, i don't know how many games we let some scrub look like Steve Young.??!!

right skip over that its been an issue and apparently still is an issue,

objective?????????????!!!! is that what you call nonsensical inaccurate posts like your reply..,go away......

Nothing you say will change the fact that the defense was bad and penalty's top 2 reasons we lost end of this, noting you say is changing that FACT.

IGNORE coming.
 
blueblood70 said:
i'm not reading past that ridiculous first line, Never missing 3 1st round pro bowlers in the same game...OH right, right those were typically LOSSES and would be for most teams when the defense is atrocious and the penalties out of line. do you need to be hit by a bus to realize how bad a defensive effort tat was againt that lack of talent?? apparently so go sell that redicluaos blame of the offsne to sportys isdiot, im not one..

we lost the game because the d was horrible TOP was robbed and penaltys took any hope of comeback away specially the one that was picked up on michael Gallup.. that was a clear pass interference call and it was clear the refs had an agenda... you want to know what we also fought fight not being able to stop the run and stop a mobile Qback, even if there are no name brand players, i don't know how many games we let some scrub look like Steve Young.??!!

right skip over that its been an issue and apparently still is an issue,

objective?????????????!!!! is that what you call nonsensical inaccurate posts like your reply..,go away......

Nothing you say will change the fact that the defense was bad and penalty's top 2 reasons we lost end of this, noting you say is changing that FACT.

IGNORE coming.
Click to expand...
lol you are so blinded it's humorous. I know you can't read properly, but if you choose to you will see that I have never said the D was blameless. Your unfortunate tunnel vision will only allow you to blame everybody but Dak and the offense. Let me sum things up for you: our D stank for the 1st game this year...our coaching stank for the 1st time this year...our undisciplined penalties were the 1st of their kind this year...blah, blah, blame the refs....Dak is using Jake over Cee in the RZ almost at 4x the pace...the offense put up 10 pts in 5 attempts in the RZ against the same Zona that ran wild on our D..Dak yet again threw into triple coverage on a key play in the game. I can't/won't try to change your views because you are incapable of seeing that we drove the field the entire game without these same 3 OL.
 
Last edited:
Redsfan_83 said:
lol you are so blinded it's humorous. I know you can't read properly, but if you choose to you will see that I have never said the D was blameless. Your unfortunate tunnel vision will only allow you to blame everybody but Dak and the offense. Let me sum things up for you: our D stank for the 1st game this year...our coaching stank for the 1st time this year...our undisciplined penalties were the 1st of their kind this year...blah, blah, blame the refs....Dak is using Jake over Cee in the RZ almost at 4x the pace...the offense put up 10 pts in 5 attempts in the RZ against the same Zona that ran wild on our D..Dak yet again threw into triple coverage on a key play in the game. I can't/won't try to change your views because you are incapable of seeing that we drove the field the entire game without these same 3 OL.
Click to expand...
sorry the D is 75% the reason we lost no doubt no debate!

15% penalty's

5% coaching

5% offense but they missed 3 PB Linemen with backup making penalty's and creating havoc in the back field that only 4 men rushing max coverage had not may opportunity's to throw

move on

you off track and for hater i can see why..

BYe BYE

go find clue get back to me win yoiu triop over it..
 
blueblood70 said:
sorry the D is 75% the reason we lost no doubt no debate!

15% penalty's

5% coaching

5% offense but they missed 3 PB Linemen with backup making penalty's and creating havoc in the back field that only 4 men rushing max coverage had not may opportunity's to throw

move on

you off track and for hater i can see why..

BYe BYE

go find clue get back to me win yoiu triop over it..
Click to expand...
dude, day drinking is clearly affecting you and I can no longer continue at this until you sober up...I'd say cheers but....
 
blueblood70 said:
sorry the D is 75% the reason we lost no doubt no debate!

15% penalty's

5% coaching

5% offense but they missed 3 PB Linemen with backup making penalty's and creating havoc in the back field that only 4 men rushing max coverage had not may opportunity's to throw

move on

you off track and for hater i can see why..

BYe BYE

go find clue get back to me win yoiu triop over it..
Click to expand...
Lol terrible assessment.

Anytime the offense only scores 16, they are going to shoulder the bulk of the blame. I don't care how many times we got in the red zone. We didn't come away with quality points.

If we win with only 16 points, then Dak did enough and the defense would have went above and beyond to help win the game.

If we win by scoring more than they did (28), then Dak went above and beyond to elevate our team to a victory despite the defense struggling.


Neither of those happened. Defense struggled and offense struggled. 50/50.
 
SpaceCowboy99 said:
Lol terrible assessment.

Anytime the offense only scores 16, they are going to shoulder the bulk of the blame. I don't care how many times we got in the red zone. We didn't come away with quality points.

If we win with only 16 points, then Dak did enough and the defense would have went above and beyond to help win the game.

If we win by scoring more than they did (28), then Dak went above and beyond to elevate our team to a victory despite the defense struggling.


Neither of those happened. Defense struggled and offense struggled. 50/50.
Click to expand...
don't try, he clearly doesn't want to or understands football or pro sports in general. Funny....
 
Gambit said:
The discussion is about offense not thee whole

The Discussion is on Offense, so let's focus on that. You brought up the penalties, how many of the 13 penalties were on the offense?
Click to expand...
That's weird because neither the title nor the OP state any such thing.
 
SteveTheCowboy said:
That's weird because neither the title nor the OP state any such thing.
Click to expand...
Additionally it in no way detracts from my question which was never answered, how many of the 13 penalties were on the offense?

This board is replete with people making claims, when queried upon those claims or statements either deflection or most often as hom and deflection, it gets frustrating when I just want to hold a conversation about things.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 8,531 (members: 37, guests: 8,494)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,596
Messages
13,820,870
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top