This is a tweet about it - how this plays out I don't know.
See below, which I posted in another thread yesterday.
****************
That is definitely the course that EE's attorneys will follow.
It will be very interesting to see what a court decides on his initial request for an injunction.
The court when considering such an application is required to consider both the alleged "irreparable harm" to the party seeking the injunction, as well as the applicant's "likelihood of success on the merits."
In plain English, that means that Zeke is going to argue that in the absence of an injunction he will suffer certain harm that cannot be corrected by paying him money later if he ultimately ended up winning the lawsuit, because even though he could get his guaranteed contract and lost game checks back, he could never get back the opportunity to play in the six games he would otherwise miss (which constitute a large chunk of one of the seasons making up his professional career).
On the other hand, after the Brady and AP appellate court rulings confirming RG's immense discretion and power granted him under the CBA, the NFL will argue that EE cannot pass the test for an injunction, since he is not likely to win in the long run anyway -- and that would be a basis for the court to deny the injunction, and allow the suspension to be enforced even while the court case proceeds.
My personal hunch is that notwithstanding the long, uphill battle EE faces on the legal questions, a court would be swayed that it is better to be safe than sorry, and will likely grant the injunction.
However, even though it seems unavoidable (since the NFL alone will have advance notice as to when the appeal decision will be issued, and therefore will be able to run to court first), I think Zeke would be safer if he could somehow be somewhere other than the Manhattan or the Minneapolis federal courts, which are expressly bound by the Brady and AP rulings, and might weigh them more heavily when analyzing the "likelihood of success" factor.