Silverstar
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,909
- Reaction score
- 3,027
I was never was a Garrett supporter.
Wish he never came back to the Cowboys.
Wish he never came back to the Cowboys.
If Jason didn't show up for a game and you put in a cardboard cutout with clapping hands, you'd have the exact same thing you get now. Nothing.
Yea I was shocked Tony actually said that. Garrett creates a fine working environment. He should be an administrator not a coach.Romo essentially stated that Garrett isn't even a coach. He's really not a coach per se. I will admit, the guy does some things well, but actual coaching isn't really one of them.
Because telling a modern day NFL team story's about Bruce Springsteen is motivating...
Yikes....whose rosters are you looking at?We have the most talented team in the league....
Romo essentially stated that Garrett isn't even a coach. He's really not a coach per se. I will admit, the guy does some things well, but actual coaching isn't really one of them.
Yikes....whose rosters are you looking at?
On offense, we don't even have the best receivers in our own division, nor the best TE.
On defense, we are young and making improvements, but our defense is still near the basement of our own division, much less the league. I'm not sure how you think we have the most talented team in the league....that's just crazy talk.
These types of conversations do nothing for me.
If you want him gone then I want to hear who you replace him with. I like Garrett but I was on board when Payton looked like he was becoming available a couple of years ago. This notion that he needs to be replaced at all costs is a nonstarter for me.
He develops players on both sides of the ball and his teams play hard for him. I do agree that he is conservative to a fault and lacks innovation. Thing is that there are a lot worse situations. Phillips was an innovator for example.
I'm tired of looking like I'm in Garrett's corner when I'm fine with or without him, but I feel the need to keep correcting this OC fallacy. The only reason he's the head coach is because he was so successful as our OC (2nd best offense in the NFL under his direction) that he was being interviewed for other head coaching jobs and had two standing offers when Jerry made him the highest paid assistant in the NFL to keep him as OC. When he struggled with some game management issues, Jerry made him give up playcalling to focus on that. He's much further into his tenure now, and frankly, I'd love to see him take the play-calling duties back over.....if he's going to be kept around.I have never supported Garrett. His problems as an OC are only magnified now. He still has zero ability to adjust in game and is regularly abused by opposing coaches.
But what did he mean by that? Do you actually think he was saying that Garrett can't coach? or that Garrett is the head coach who doesn't fun the offense or the defense? Jimmy Johnson didn't do either job, wasn't involved in x's and o's, yet we all think of him as a great coach. I don't think Garrett is a great coach, but I also don't think Romo meant what many on this board are reading into his comments.Romo essentially stated that Garrett isn't even a coach. He's really not a coach per se. I will admit, the guy does some things well, but actual coaching isn't really one of them.
Should I just wait until they lose again and this retread thread is going to make the rounds again? They will lose again. And I know it will be the coaches fault.
I’ll just add on to my earlier comments by repeating this
"In big games, coaches have to step up, and I have yet to see the Dallas coaches step up." - @jawsespn