xwalker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 56,994
- Reaction score
- 64,467
Haley was a trade, not a free agent.Ever hear of Charles Haley or Deion Sanders
Deion was added to a core that had just won 2 Super Bowls.
Haley was a trade, not a free agent.Ever hear of Charles Haley or Deion Sanders
We’re probably the best drafting team in the NFL. If anybody can bank on primarily building through the draft, it’s us. We don’t spend big in FA because we draft so well and have to spend our cap space to resign our own guys. We have 10 picks. We’re going to move up a couple times and get some difference makers.
The Pro Bowlers argument is weak. Esp considering how little it means nowadays, and how many turn it down, so they go through the alternates. One of those pro bowlers you're referencing, Mike Jenkins, was the 3rd alternate.Legitimate arguments can be made for Jacksonville and Pittsburgh — both snake a lot of my favorite players — but Jacksonville has also picked in or near the top 5 for a majoroty of the past decade. Even still, we’ve drafted more Pro Bowlers than they have. The Steelers have also benefited from picking ahead of us. They stole Ryan Shazier, Martavius Bryant and Bud Dupree from us, we had to “settle” for Zack Martin, Anthony Hitchens and Byron Jones. And in general, they’ve also drafted fewer Pro Bowlers than us. I feel confident saying we’re the best drafting team in the NFL.
My thoughts....it's actually been pretty clear what the plan is. There isn't any big secret or hidden mystery to be solved here. Not sure why it is so curious at all. This is how the Cowboys run their business the first week of FA.What is the plan to upgrade this roster?
One of the curious aspects of this offseason so far is that it is not very clear what this FO’s strategy is to upgrade this roster in areas that were clearly problems last year.
Thoughts?
But players take time to develop so we’re never really drastically improving.
By the time one crop is developed 5 other holes have popped up.
We have to stop skipping Free Agency. Plain and simple.
Alternates can come from every team, not just the Cowboys, so no, the argument is not weak.The Pro Bowlers argument is weak. Esp considering how little it means nowadays, and how many turn it down, so they go through the alternates. One of those pro bowlers you're referencing, Mike Jenkins, was the 3rd alternate.
Are you serious? Based on what?I don't think that they're planning on upgrading the roster much.
Making a Pro Bowl is completely overrated.The Pro Bowlers argument is weak. Esp considering how little it means nowadays, and how many turn it down, so they go through the alternates. One of those pro bowlers you're referencing, Mike Jenkins, was the 3rd alternate.
And I’m not saying yet that this front office is blowing it, I’m just curious what they seem to be counting on to upgrade this roster.
Thoughts?
Disagree, and you didn't address the fact that the number of pro bowlers is affected by several factors. Also, team building is not about counting probowlers, it's about getting your team into super bowl contention. Since we've failed to even come close, that throws another fact against your contention that we're the best drafting team there is. Good/great drafting teams fill the weaknesses that are keeping them out of contention. We are getting better at it, no doubt. Prolly what we need right now is a personnel guy who understands the team building concept.Alternates can come from every team, not just the Cowboys, so no, the argument is not weak.
Agree 100%. If roster quality is based on pro bowlers rather than playoff success, then I guess we as fans should be satisfied with our favorite team’s performance the last 20 plus seasons.Disagree, and you didn't address the fact that the number of pro bowlers is affected by several factors. Also, team building is not about counting probowlers, it's about getting your team into super bowl contention. Since we've failed to even come close, that throws another fact against your contention that we're the best drafting team there is. Good/great drafting teams fill the weaknesses that are keeping them out of contention. We are getting better at it, no doubt. Prolly what we need right now is a personnel guy who understands the team building concept.
Jerry has already tried and failed at the collecting pro bowlers idea. It doesn't work.Agree 100%. If roster quality is based on pro bowlers rather than playoff success, then I guess we as fans should be satisfied with our favorite team’s performance the last 20 plus seasons.
I said the Cowboys were the best drafting team in the NFL as a counter argument to the “why aren’t we spending money in free agency” debate. My point was backed with solid stats that prove the Cowboys draft more good players (Pro Bowlers) than every team but one. Now since that can’t be refuted, the goal post is getting moved back to “results”. Player acquisition was the debate, not results. Dallas usually has a very talented roster, mainly due to how well the draft. Why they’ve failed in the post season is a separate discussion altogether and it’s irrelevant to my original point.Agree 100%. If roster quality is based on pro bowlers rather than playoff success, then I guess we as fans should be satisfied with our favorite team’s performance the last 20 plus seasons.
I understand and your point is well made. I just wanted to make clear that I believe roster building should be evaluated first by results, second by pro bowl, and all pro results.I said the Cowboys were the best drafting team in the NFL as a counter argument to the “why aren’t we spending money in free agency” debate. My point was backed with solid stats that prove the Cowboys draft more good players (Pro Bowlers) than every team but one. Now since that can’t be refuted, the goal post is getting moved back to “results”. Player acquisition was the debate, not results. Dallas usually has a very talented roster, mainly due to how well the draft. Why they’ve failed in the post season is a separate discussion altogether and it’s irrelevant to my original point.
Good point I think they feel they have the Super Bowl team that they had one last year and the suspension messed it up so what's the draft picks they think they can Breeze right to the Super Bowl especially with Coach of the Year Garrett leading the wayI think the FO in under the assumption that Zeke 's..suspension was the root cause for the teams decline. Feeling that having Zeke for a full 16 will right the ship. Hence few changes are needed. This group of rudderless..stooges just don't get it.
One of the curious aspects of this offseason so far is that it is not very clear what this FO’s strategy is to upgrade this roster in areas that were clearly problems last year. I’m sure it will be much clearer by late April.
I like the idea of not overpaying for high priced mediocre talent as many teams seem to have done this offseason. I like putting more emphasis on having a quality draft. But if there are no FAs signed that can help this team now, it puts enormous pressure on the draft having immediate impact. That’s not impossible, but it puts all eggs in one basket.
And I’m not saying yet that this front office is blowing it, I’m just curious what they seem to be counting on to upgrade this roster.
Thoughts?
I said the Cowboys were the best drafting team in the NFL as a counter argument to the “why aren’t we spending money in free agency” debate. My point was backed with solid stats that prove the Cowboys draft more good players (Pro Bowlers) than every team but one. Now since that can’t be refuted, the goal post is getting moved back to “results”. Player acquisition was the debate, not results. Dallas usually has a very talented roster, mainly due to how well the draft. Why they’ve failed in the post season is a separate discussion altogether and it’s irrelevant to my original point.