To recap:
Our defense gave up 30 points.
Our defense gave up 250+ rushing yards.
Our defense forced one punt.
Our defense got ZERO SACKS and only ONE pressure on the QB. ONE PRESSURE. They didn’t even knock Goff down all night.
Our defense got ZERO turnovers.
Dak’s fault we lost......
A post in this thread elevated Goff and Luck and to imply that Dak wasn't as good or elite as them. Luck throws for only 12 yards at one point and only scores 6 points. And I just saw stats where Goff had only 186 yards and no TDs and Dak had 266 yards and 1 TD. Yet, because Luck/Goff fit the image and because the media and NFL fans built them up to be elite QBs. They will get more of a pass for their bad to average playoff performances. While Dak gets roasted for not being more perfect and while he will take more heat than Luck will take for how the Colts played yesterday.
Also, just like Goff was assisted greatly by a huge rushing game and our defense allowing a record number in rushing yards allowed. So, that took a lot of the pressure off of Goff. Yet, some still praising him, for making a few good throws, when he throw for under 200 yards. The type of performance, where some would say that it's all Zeke/the running game for winning, if the game had played out in vise versa.
They would look at Dak having 186 yards and 0 TDs and over 200 rushing yards, with several rushing TDS and say that Zeke/the running game carried Dak to a win. But, Goff will get the credit and praise for the Rams win, just because of how he is built up to be elite in the eyes of some. Goff's numbers are the exact type in which some would use to discredit Dak if he had them.
This proves that because of the bias against Dak, some are so willing to put all of the blame on him, that they'll overlook QBs, who didn't do much better in this seasons playoffs than Dak did, despite being built up to be "Much better" than Dak is. QBs like Luck and Goff, given the benefit of the doubt, where Dak isn't.