Video: Cowherd: This is what you're going to see in the next 7 or 8 years from Dallas

[G2]

You do know that he had possessions in the other 3 quarters too, right? Not blaming him entirely for the loss but he had a hand in it.

He had a bigger hand in the fact that the game was even close.

 

[Philmonroe]

Or he ignored your juvenile bigotry, and carried on with his life.

There is no bigotry in those comments unless you make certain people's lifestyle some inferior thing for your information. If it was said he had straight tendencies would it be bigotry?

 

[Philmonroe]

Thats a thick load you're shoveling considering you just gloated about accusing him of having homosexual tendencies and then attacked another poster.

So are being homophobic and hypocrital your two worst traits, or just the most obvious?

There is nothing phobic about what was said unless you think those traits you're defending are inferior traits. I know you don't so I think you should find a new way to defend those comments

 

[Sydla]

Again, we are 8 years in and have had minimal success. History also shows that it's rare that coaches go this long and then suddenly their careers take a different trajectory. I am not sure why people think what Cowherd is saying here is so outrageous.

 

[Sydla]

Or he ignored your juvenile bigotry, and carried on with his life.

LOL. I can't believe CCBoy actually typed that out. Geezus.

 

[Northern_Cowboy]

This is dumb. Foles looked terrible under Jeff Fisher. Goff looked terrible under Fisher. Both get new coaches and boom, look at them now. Coaching does matter. Kellen Moore, Linehan and Garrett is his support system. Yeah, that's as bad as it gets.

Running will diminish? Ummm this dumb staff has already handcuffed him and brainwashed him into not running at all.

Dak is no different than Wentz or Goff. In fact, Goff has played pretty poor in both playoff games. But easy to win when you gain almost 300yds on the ground. He didn't have that against Atlanta last year and they got dominated.

Dak plays with a poor staff in an antiquated style offense that just doesn't work anymore. Or at least, we don't have the personnel to run it.

Steve McNair looked very good under Fisher, infact they went to a SB and the playoffs 4 times in a 5 year span and went 56-24 and in 2007-8 he had a 2 year span with the Great Kerry Collins lol and went 23-9 and also went to the playoffs twice. Fisher made not have had alot of success his last 4-5 years in the NFL but he had a ton of success the previous 15 seasons before that

 

[Sydla]

What? Year 9 was when he took his team to the second round of the playoffs for the third time in five years? Yea, that is quite a slump you're calling there...after leading his team to twice having the top record in the NFC. Yea, losing twice to Green Bay...lead by Aaron Rodgers, losing with a since over turned play by Dez Bryant. (a last second field goal in both games was the difference) coughing, we now have a defense worth mentioning despite this past game.

That earns respect, not disdain!!

LOL.

Yes, failing to get past the divisional round for the 2nd time, coupled with only 2 playoff wins in 8 full seasons is something to celebrate.

What's funny about this stuff is that you guys love to profess you are better Cowboys fans. But yet you set such a low bar for success for what you think is one of the most successful franchises in football. The Cowboys are the BEST!!!!!!!!!!!! Well until they show they aren't the best, then it's well, they IMPROVED!!!!!!!!!!

When a season starts, you guys get pissy if someone suggests this team is better or that team is better. You get pissy if someone suggests this coach is better or that coach is better. Then the season ends, we peter out and suddenly it's time to put the team and it's season in "perspective". Funny how the expectations change for you guys once the results are in.

 

[texbumthelife]

There is nothing phobic about what was said unless you think those traits you're defending are inferior traits. I know you don't so I think you should find a new way to defend those comments

When you you accused someone of homosexual tendencies in a derogatory way, yes, it's homophobic and borderline hate speech. Saying someone is a homosexual, outright, is not homophobic. Degrading ones character while accusing them of homosexual tendencies is. If you can't see the difference there, then you're the one who needs to reanalyze things, not me.

This is the last I will address this here. I'm not going to bring myself or this forum down to that level any longer. If you want to discuss further, my private messages are open.

 

[Sydla]

Listen son, take your flippant crap and find another yard to deposit it in...or just see a recruiter.

Try discussing football and not just a stylized agenda. Maybe use more than a YOU, second person, to communicate anything of meaning...oh yea, you are the meaning. Run along now, ring tapper. I forgot, your generation doesn't figure things out. Bring out your snickering...but on ignore now.

Straight up, I don't respect his form of bigotry and cheap thrills....kind of like your turning your shoulder to another's pride.

Really impressive as well...

the man still doesn't own up, and you?

LOL.

Discuss football but yet you tell us you once told Cowherd he has "gay tendencies". Frankly, I am not sure what your point there was other than apparently in your eyes, gay tendencies is a negative.

You are the quintessential angry old man, thinking your "life experiences" give you the cache to insult people, exhibit bigoted tendencies, etc.

 

[Sydla]

There is nothing phobic about what was said unless you think those traits you're defending are inferior traits. I know you don't so I think you should find a new way to defend those comments

Dude.

He's basically stipulated that he doesn't like Cowherd. He then takes him on and suggests he has "gay tendencies". How, in any sort of logical conclusion, can you argue that he wasn't projecting a negative connotation to "gay tendencies"?

Yes, when one wants to criticize or insult a person and says he might have "gay tendencies", guess what? That's bigoted/phobic. Because you are putting a negative connotation on exhibiting behaviors that are gay.

 

[Sydla]

When you you accused someone of homosexual tendencies in a derogatory way, yes, it's homophobic and borderline hate speech. Saying someone is a homosexual, outright, is not homophobic. Degrading ones character while accusing them of homosexual tendencies is. If you can't see the difference there, then you're the one who needs to reanalyze things, not me.

This is the last I will address this here. I'm not going to bring myself or this forum down to that level any longer. If you want to discuss further, my private messages are open.

Spot on.

 

[Philmonroe]

When you you accused someone of homosexual tendencies in a derogatory way, yes, it's homophobic and borderline hate speech. Saying someone is a homosexual, outright, is not homophobic. Degrading ones character while accusing them of homosexual tendencies is. If you can't see the difference there, then you're the one who needs to reanalyze things, not me.

This is the last I will address this here. I'm not going to bring myself or this forum down to that level any longer. If you want to discuss further, my private messages are open.

Oh I will definitely pm you but don't you hit me over the head with the you're more moral than me bs.

 

[Philmonroe]

Dude.

He's basically stipulated that he doesn't like Cowherd. He then takes him on and suggests he has "gay tendencies". How, in any sort of logical conclusion, can you argue that he wasn't projecting a negative connotation to "gay tendencies"?

Yes, when one wants to criticize or insult a person and says he might have "gay tendencies", guess what? That's bigoted/phobic. Because you are putting a negative connotation on exhibiting behaviors that are gay.

Y'all put yalls on projection on it. It's cool we disagree on this issue but I wish folks stop projecting because y'all been trained to see inferiority when there isn't any.

 

[Sydla]

Y'all put yalls on projection on it. It's cool we disagree on this issue but I wish folks stop projecting because y'all been trained to see inferiority when there isn't any.

There is no projection here.

It's clear as day. He doesn't like Cowherd. He admits that he actually contacted him to tell him he has "gay tendencies". How in the world can you argue that he wasn't putting a negative connotation on gay tendencies.

I'd love to see your explanation of what he meant or was driving at when he told a guy he didn't like and wanted to take on, that he has gay tendencies.

 

[Philmonroe]

There is no projection here.

It's clear as day. He doesn't like Cowherd. He admits that he actually contacted him to tell him he has "gay tendencies". How in the world can you argue that he wasn't putting a negative connotation on gay tendencies.

I'd love to see your explanation of what he meant or was driving at when he told a guy he didn't like and wanted to take on, that he has gay tendencies.

Nothing but projection but like me and Texbum did hit up the pm if you want to continue this convo. If not we can leave it at we disagree with the others pov on this issue.

 

[Jake]

Steve McNair looked very good under Fisher, infact they went to a SB and the playoffs 4 times in a 5 year span and went 56-24 and in 2007-8 he had a 2 year span with the Great Kerry Collins lol and went 23-9 and also went to the playoffs twice. Fisher made not have had alot of success his last 4-5 years in the NFL but he had a ton of success the previous 15 seasons before that

Jeff Fisher's first 15 seasons as head coach:

6 winning seasons

3 division titles

5-6 record in playoff games

1-1 in conference title games

0-1 in the Super Bowl

 

[Cebrin]

There is no bigotry in those comments unless you make certain people's lifestyle some inferior thing for your information. If it was said he had straight tendencies would it be bigotry?

It was implied with his remark. So yes, there was. Also, yes if it is within the same context of being used in form of an insult.

 

[Cebrin]

LOL. I can't believe CCBoy actually typed that out. Geezus.

Well, I'm quickly finding he's not the only one. Lol

 

[Philmonroe]

It was implied with his remark. So yes, there was. Also, yes if it is within the same context of being used in form of an insult.

Youre late to this party I'm done discussing this issue so feel however makes you feel more morally superior my good sir

 

[triplets_93]

isn't year ten, the year Garrett blossoms into Landry?

It's a Process...