Goff vs Prescott

[AmericanCowboy]

Goff was terrible and scared.

Dak would have been better. Dak is also awesome though and with better coaching would be much better.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

If a QB runs in a TD to win a big game, then no one is going to say. "Nah, I'm not going to take that win, he's a QB not a RB, so those points shouldn't count."

Exactly. You take any points you can get especially in this offense.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Yeah. Some creative coaches and decent defensive fronts across the board though, and I expect Niners + Cards to take some blue chip DL/edge at the top of this crazy DL draft, have some high picks in round 2-3, and prob get some decent talent in FA. They'll be building their teams to win in the Division, and the #1 enemy is the Rams.

NFL is a copycat league though and there's a playbook on Goff now. I just think it'll be a lot tougher sledding next year in the NFC West. Wouldn't be surprised to see them lose 1-2 games in the division instead of a clean sweep.

To me Cards are some years away.....just personnel wise. And I don’t believe in Jimmy G yet.

 

[JoeKing]

I've always believed that Dak is a better QB than Goff. Dak is good enough to get us to the SB but even more important is he is good enough to be the reason we win it. His "want to" in the fourth quarter of games is special.

 

[ItzKelz]

Goff = Kurt Cousins = Overrated

 

[ItzKelz]

But Dak doesnt have the throwing skills of Goff. Overall Goff had a better season...why do Dak fans have to try and tear down every qb? Im surprised nobody has made a dak vs brady thread

The more surprising thing is why Cowboys fans here try to tear down Dak. With that said the Rams lost this game because of Goff and his late reads and inaccuracy.

 

[Hadenough]

After seeing Goff's superbowl performance, I'm more than glad we have Dak.

Goff played with no heart, no fire, no emotion.

It is evident that Goff needs just as a strong supporting cast and a great offensive minded head coach in order to be successful.

Dak almost has as many weapons but not a lower level coach.

Dak has the heart and leadership skills to win a superbowl.

This is what happens when you have a young QB and Belichick has two weeks to scheme for him. Goff is a better QB than Dak I can only imagine how bad Dak would of looked.

 

[birdwells1]

So only passing TDs count not rushing?

Yes, I don't count td passes for any other position than qb.

 

[birdwells1]

Goff was, literally, the worst starting QB in the NFL from the end of November on. He’s been awful since the Lions/Bears games.

He's been bad since Cooper Kupp was injured.

 

[mattjames2010]

Absolutely stupid thread. Young QB and coach went up against the GOAT QB and coach. Phillips was the only vet with the Rams and it showed.

Goff got to the Super Bowl - Dak is slipping his tongue down a strippers throat right now and wondering what that itch is downstairs.

 

[birdwells1]

Cooks dropped 2 TD passes.

Goff was very late on one throw and the other was a PI.

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

The refs got them to the Super Bowl.

270 yards rushing against us got him to the Superbowl as well. I have repeated this over and over again. But, emphasis this point, because Dak having Zeke, is what constantly is used to discredit him. Yet, when it comes to QBs that fans favor, they either ignore the Running game contributing to team''s playoff run, in order to give credit to the QB that they like. Or they just use the solid running game and strong supporting cast, if favor of the QB that they support.

"He's a elite QB, he just needs a solid running game to reach his full potential or he couldn't accomplish certain goals, because he didn't have a solid running game/supporting cast. But, I still believe he can be elite and great with a better team."

And if some support QBs like Goff, then they will use a solid running game to enhance the debate in favor of Goff or they still give Goff most of the credit for making it to the Superbowl, despite a huge rushing game being more of a reason why the Rams beat us.

Yet, with Dak it's. "He's not a great QB and will never be a great QB, because he has to have Zeke playing well to win/be productive."

Let's night, Gurley was limited and Belechick wouldn't allow the Rams running game to take off and that put most of the pressure on Dak and the Rams had one of the poorest offensive performances of the Superbowl. That happens with Dak and people are saying how Dak can't win without Zeke.

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

This is what happens when you have a young QB and Belichick has two weeks to scheme for him. Goff is a better QB than Dak I can only imagine how bad Dak would of looked.

Dak is a young QB as well, yet that doesn't get him get any slack with his doubters. And it wouldn't have gotten him cut any slack against Belichick. Even when Dak would have had Garrett coaching him. Sounds like excuses being made for Goff, when some accuse Dak Supporters making excuses for Dak.

 

[mattjames2010]

270 yards rushing against us got him to the Superbowl as well. I have repeated this over and over again. But, emphasis this point, because Dak having Zeke, is what constantly is used to discredit him. Yet, when it comes to QBs that fans favor, they either ignore the Running game contributing to team''s playoff run, in order to give credit to the QB that they like. Or they just use the solid running game and strong supporting cast, if favor of the QB that they support.

"He's a elite QB, he just needs a solid running game to reach his full potential or he couldn't accomplish certain goals, because he didn't have a solid running game/supporting cast. But, I still believe he can be elite and great with a better team."

And if some support QBs like Goff, then they will use a solid running game to enhance the debate in favor of Goff or they still give Goff most of the credit for making it to the Superbowl, despite a huge rushing game being more of a reason why the Rams beat us.

Yet, with Dak it's. "He's not a great QB and will never be a great QB, because he has to have Zeke playing well to win/be productive."

Let's night, Gurley was limited and Belechick wouldn't allow the Rams running game to take off and that put most of the pressure on Dak and the Rams had one of the poorest offensive performances of the Superbowl. That happens with Dak and people are saying how Dak can't win without Zeke.

Goff didn't have a running game against the Saints and was clutch. Being young and going up against a HC that confuses even veteran QBs kinda has a way of bringing out poor performances in the opposition.

We'll make comparisons of Goff and Dak when Dak makes his clutch drives in a championship. Until then, Goff may be 0-1 in the Super Bowl, but Dak is 0-2 in the divisional round. Since that's how we are judging QBs.

 

[WillieBeamen]

So only passing TDs count not rushing?

The guy CLEARLY said PASSING SKILLS


You Dak stans are pathetic

 

[Gaede]

Not impressed by Goff.

Maybe because he looks like he's 13 years old.

I can't imagine someone so slight having a long career.

 

[atlantacowboy]

After seeing Goff's superbowl performance, I'm more than glad we have Dak.

Goff played with no heart, no fire, no emotion.

It is evident that Goff needs just as a strong supporting cast and a great offensive minded head coach in order to be successful.

Dak almost has as many weapons but not a lower level coach.

Dak has the heart and leadership skills to win a superbowl.

Ok. Go ahead and Slam Goff. The record still shows Goff one NFC title and Prescott 0.

He played poorly last night but he also ran into a very motivated Bill Belechek whose defense was embarrassed last year in the super bowl.

 

[Rayman70]

Dak would have provided an additional offensive threat for the Rams if he were their QB yesterday in the SB. Goff was playing checkers while the Pats were playing chess. He was just overmatched. Dak would have at least given them a slim chance at the end. Give me Dak any day of the week over Goff.

 

[The Realist]

He had a bad stretch but he got them to the SB. Dak was horrible from the second half of last season to first half of this season and yall made every excuse for him

You mean when Tyron was hurt and Chaz Green show was on....while Zeke was suspended? When we had no number one WR with Dez not able to get separation? Or beginning of this year when we were trying to run WR by platoon with depth guys playing major snaps? How about that OL coach we started the year with? How about not having a legit TE?

Any of these things contribute to that?

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

Goff didn't have a running game against the Saints and was clutch. Being young and going up against a HC that confuses even veteran QBs kinda has a way of bringing out poor performances in the opposition.

We'll make comparisons of Goff and Dak when Dak makes his clutch drives in a championship. Until then, Goff may be 0-1 in the Super Bowl, but Dak is 0-2 in the divisional round. Since that's how we are judging QBs.

Dak makes a clutch drive, with or without a drive and people would still point to the 270 yard rushing game prior to the NFC Championship game and say that Zeke got him there. Also, let's not pretend like Dak being clutch in an NFC Championship game, wouldn't have gotten him bashed to the moon and back, if he only pulled off 3 points against the Patriots in the Superbowl.

Goff wouldn't have gotten to the NFC Championship game, without our defense giving up 270 yards rushing and this is a fact. The Refs gave the Rams their spot in the Superbowl, this is another fact. And both which would be used to discredit Dak. Since, everything is used to discredit Dak, while other QBs get excused or get the benefit of the doubt. Like Goff is receiving.

Just like some will keep complaining about excuses being made for Dak. Yet, make excuses for Goff, where under the same circumstances they wouldn't be made for Dak. Now, some point to Goff "getting them there". When the same ones would just either focus on what Dak did wrong, in order to make the Cowboys only score 3 points in the Superbowl or they would would discredit Dak getting to the Superbowl, and say that the COwboys were there for other reasons.

Yet, if Cowboys fans were to focus on Dak getting them to the Superbowl or what Dak did in the Championship game, to counter a 3 point offensive performances, they would be called "Dak homers"

Dak supporters get criticized by Dak doubters for focusing on the good games, whenever the Cowboys lose or has a bad offensive performance. Yet, others cherry pick when they want to defend the QBs they support.