Romo vs Dak

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,920
Reaction score
35,159
LOL...

Jason Garrett was actually calling the plays then. That’s the biggest excuse for Dak homers as regards to his issues, and Garrett has been completely removed from play calling. Romo has journeymen OL and guys like Julius Jones running into the backs of linemen, while Dak has ‘chunky Zeke” whose the focal point of every defense. Dak has basically a top 3 OL, with the least amount of QB pressure the majority of the season and sits back there all day, staring at WRs running wide open all day.

Romo turned a completely garbage roster around that almost had Parcells on a heart attack on the sidelines into a contender in the NFC.

Romo with his broken back against a garbage Eagles team with the same roster as Dak threw lasers downfield WITHOUT ZEKE and scored a TD immediately while Dak was running around looking like a chicken with his head cut off.

That’s the difference.

WE LOST A SB WINDOW training this mediocre QB with a roster that was finally ready to make a run for the SB, with the addition of Zeke, who was drafted specifically for Romo.
 
Last edited:

rnr_honeybadger

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,533
Reaction score
17,533
The one common thing that fans of both QBs can agree on is that both these QBs were/are being done a disservice by the terrible coaching staff. Romo would have won a ring with the proper organization and coaching staff. Too bad we are now continuing that trend with Dak as well.
 

408Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,785
Reaction score
6,219
LOL...

Jason Garrett was actually calling the plays then. That’s the biggest excuse for Dak homers as regards to his issues, and Garrett has been completely removed from play calling. Romo has journeymen OL and guys like Julius Jones running into the backs of linemen, while Dak has ‘chunky Zeke” whose the focal point of every defense. Dak has basically a top 3 OL, with the least amount of QB pressure the majority of the season and sits back there all day, staring at WRs running wide open all day.

Romo turned a completely garbage roster around that almost had Parcells on a heart attack on the sidelines into a contender in the NFC.

Romo with his broken back against a garbage Eagles team with the same roster as Dak three lasers downfield and scored a TD immediately while Dak was running around looking like a chicken with his head cut off.
Yes, Romo in his tenth year being compared to a rookie. This is idiocy.
 

gerbjim22

New Member
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure the games before Romo became the starter should count against his yards per game. The OP stated that his YPG was 219.1, But when he actually took over as starter his numbers were 269.1 YPG.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,920
Reaction score
35,159
Yes, Romo in his tenth year being compared to a rookie. This is idiocy.

Romo was in his tenth year when he saved Parcell’s last season here from being an utter disaster? Romo made Gurode, a guy that couldn’t even call plays, eligible for the pro-bowl, of which a third is fan voting anyways. Dak on the other hand, had three all pro linemen with the best RB and running game in the business, developed by Callahan by the way, when he walked into the job and an OL that is basically the best in the league, contrary to all the excuse makers for Dak, when he has a bad game.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,920
Reaction score
35,159
Romo was better at the end. Dak is farther along than Romo was at the same point.

second ranked scoring offense in the league, 4211 yards passing, 36 TDs thrown, while being sacked 24 times in his second year and Dak is farther along? A Dak who in his third year starting was basically sacking himself a majority of times to a whopping 56, while being among the top QBs in time to throw, along with a league leading fumbles in year 3, with Linehan calling the plays?
 

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,053
Reaction score
17,311
second ranked scoring offense in the league, 4211 yards passing, 36 TDs thrown, while being sacked 24 times in his second year and Dak is farther along? A Dak who in his third year starting was basically sacking himself a majority of times to a whopping 56, while being among the top QBs in time to throw, along with a league leading fumbles in year 3, with Linehan calling the plays?

Romo had his first start last week.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,920
Reaction score
35,159
Well considering that Romo didn’t even get on the field in his second year I’d say yea.

You clearly know what I meant. Being anal doesn’t refute the evidence. Dak is in year 4 as a STARTER while bring in optimal conditions, including guys like Collins who basically haven’t even allowed QB pressure while playing thus year and was ranked as the best OL this year, while Romo had a journeyman Columbo who was average at bet his whole career.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,920
Reaction score
35,159
I mean look at the irony.. Dak is supposedly bad, because of Garrett’s offense, when Jerry completeky removed him from the offense in 2014, while Romo actually had Garrett calling the plays and didn’t even have his QB in game planning meetings...

this is what we are dealing with when it comes to their delusion.
 

408Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,785
Reaction score
6,219
But you said year TEN...
Who cares? You once argued Dak needs the best to succeed and that Romo never got a shot in 16 to play with Zeke when he was drafted for Romo. It was a straight whine fest. I then asked you a simple question that if it's true that Dak's success in 16 was due to having all the talent around him shouldn't the same be said for Romo who as you said that team was built for? You then spent about 5 pages dodging that question.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,920
Reaction score
35,159
Who cares? You once argued Dak needs the best to succeed and that Romo never got a shot in 16 to play with Zeke when he was drafted for Romo. It was a straight whine fest. I then asked you a simple question that if it's true that Dak's success in 16 was due to having all the talent around him shouldn't the same be said for Romo who as you said that team was built for? You then spent about 5 pages dodging that question.

romo didn’t have his MVP season in his first year with Linehan being robbed on the road in Lambeau, was basically flawless in sub-zero temperature, and for the regular season throwing 70%, 34 TD and 9 INTs that season ? What are you smoking?
 

408Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,785
Reaction score
6,219
You clearly know what I meant. Being anal doesn’t refute the evidence. Dak is in year 4 as a STARTER while bring in optimal conditions, including guys like Collins who basically haven’t even allowed QB pressure while playing thus year and was ranked as the best OL this year, while Romo had a journeyman Columbo who was average at bet his whole career.
Holy **** you just did the same anal crap a few posts ago. Literally one of the biggest hypocrites on this site. That's quite an accomplishment. Bravo:clap:
 
Top