2 Questions For the Zoners Who Want to Let Moore Go

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,859
Reaction score
27,442
While Romo saved people’s jobs longer than they should’ve had them (aka Garrett), it appears Dak is a factor in causing others to lose their jobs — starting (wrongfully IMO) with Romo.
Romo was like a Walmart shirt. Looked pretty but cheap when it's all said and done. You guys liked the way he looked when he was QBing, but the way he looked was not conducive to winning titles, with proof being, he didn't win any titles.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,339
Reaction score
11,290
Have you ever considered that route concept was simple because that's all the QB can handle or the receivers didn't adjust?
Again though KM is the OC, so i want to follow along this line... This is what your saying, Our OC signed off on a QB who can only throw 10 yard curls, like GLOWINGLY backed him when he took the job. Fast forward as he is the OC the QB has regressed OR the OC lied... What the OC did not do is put in an offense that transelates to a QB who can not throw the ball.. Dak has Flaws, KM has showed no signs of changing for them or even acknowledging they exsist. He has like you hung his hat on the #1 Offense but ONLY when the flawed QB is in because it was 27th without the QB. Thats hard to consider actually
 

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,457
Reaction score
11,571
For all the people who want to ditch Moore, help me understand. If you drop the Andy Dalton year, the last 3 years the Cowboys have been 4th,
1st and 6th in scoring. For those 3 years combined, the Cowboys are 2nd in scoring only behind KC.
The OC accomplished this with a QB that everyone but those completely in the tank for Dak agrees has fatal limitations, torpedoed
our post season this year with turnovers, and ended our post season last year with the stupidest in game decision I've seen since.....well ever.

Seems like the obvious problem is the QB not the OC, and if anything this OC has over achieved.

My 2 questions to the legion of Zoners who want to ditch Moore are:
1. Given Dak's liabilities, what exactly do you think a new OC will realistically accomplish that Moore hasn't already accomplished?
2. Given how profilic Moore's offenses have been compared to those of other OC's, do you realize it's likely that any offense under a new OC
will be worse not better?
Idc
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,901
Reaction score
8,081
Romo was like a Walmart shirt. Looked pretty but cheap when it's all said and done. You guys liked the way he looked when he was QBing, but the way he looked was not conducive to winning titles, with proof being, he didn't win any titles.
That’s because winning titles is an organizational accomplishment. Not a single player in the history of game has ever won a SB on his own.
 

Irvin88_4life

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,508
Reaction score
26,396
Have you ever considered that route concept was simple because that's all the QB can handle or the receivers didn't adjust?
That's not even close to being true.

So you agree then that Moore route concepts are trash and hinders the offense
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
OMGZ

You got me.

SF is better than us. Go figure.

He needs more weapons and a ground game.

Look, i wasn't for hiring McCarthy in the first place...but if you are going to make that mistake, you have to let him coach what he knows. So this is where we ignore his 2016 Cc game appearance and the 5 victories in the playoffs from 2011-2016?

What is so great about Kellen's resume, since we want to bag on what McCarthy has actually accomplished?
He had weapons last season and has had a running game...and this season he had a quality defense....and Dak still threw the game away.
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
As has been shown here is recent days, Jimmy Johnson AND Bill Parcells both think Dak is good enough to win a super Bowl.

Read that last sentence again, slowly, until you understand it.
LOL...you keep repeating the same BS talking point without mentioning Johnson said everything has to be perfect around Dak. So desperate.
 

Irvin88_4life

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,508
Reaction score
26,396
Have you ever considered that route concept was simple because that's all the QB can handle or the receivers didn't adjust?
Also to prove you wrong, if Dak struggles like you say then why run routes that helps a defense defend better instead of getting receivers wide open to make it easier on Dak.

That would be even more evidence that Moore needs to go
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
Cuz most fans are stupid and don’t understand football. Who carried the offense? Zeke? Under rush the offense was something like 26th in scoring. With dak it was #1. Even a complete moron can see who was the difference maker.
Agreed, the difference make...especially in the loss to SF...was Dak.
 

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,705
Reaction score
17,366
He had weapons last season and has had a running game...and this season he had a quality defense....and Dak still threw the game away.
There was no running game vs the 49ers in either year.

The offensive approach was the same as well.

Bye Kellen.
 

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,705
Reaction score
17,366
LOL...you keep repeating the same BS talking point without mentioning Johnson said everything has to be perfect around Dak. So desperate.
Yes, exactly like Aikman.

Your argument is so pathetic.
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
The qb that has lead the #1 offense in football 3 years running? :lmao::lmao::flagwave:
...and that has resulted in a record for Dak of 21-12 (regular season) and 1-2 (playoffs) with chokes to end Dallas' hopes....but so long as your Stats Prescott gets his numbers who cares about team success.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
...and that has resulted in a record for Dak of 21-12 (regular season) and 1-2 (playoffs) with chokes to end Dallas' hopes....but so long as your Stats Prescott gets his numbers who cares about team success.
We lost to the better team. No crime in that.

Did you predict a cowboys win?

I guess you don’t like making the playoffs? Would you rather suck?

Why so you can run around clapping that we suck?

Qbs don’t have records.
 

RonWashington

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,309
Reaction score
8,271
Three things stood out against SF . 2nd and 2 can take the lead going into half Moore dials up a pass which is picked off SF has the lead going into half .

Pollard breaks his leg and even before that injury Zeke is ineffective why can’t Dallas go Boston Scott third back change of pace fresh legs Malik Davis ?

The pass rush seemed effective for SF in the flat not one shot to Ferguson ? Use players that dress game day mix and match . 21 off tackle wasn’t cutting it . When you pile up 50 points against Indy and the stats get fat and happy how do you take that into playoff football ? KM if the road is over in Dallas will land somewhere it seems like the O room needs a different approach .
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
There was no running game vs the 49ers in either year.

The offensive approach was the same as well.

Bye Kellen.
So Dak couldn't step up when needed to is what you are saying. I agree.

SF scored 23 points in last year's playoff game, 7 of those points in part because of a Dak INT....and SF scored 19 points this playoff game, 6 of those points in part because of Dak's 2 INT's......so without the turnovers the Dallas defense held SF to 28 points in 2 games for an average of 14 points/game....and Dak lost both games....period.
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
We lost to the better team. No crime in that.

Did you predict a cowboys win?

I guess you don’t like making the playoffs? Would you rather suck?

Why so you can run around clapping that we suck?

Qbs don’t have records.
Stats would differ your opinion and Dak has done nothing to help Dallas get over the hump but pump the team when it matters most.
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
Like in the bucs game?
Oh yes, the TB game that you and others point to as 'proof' Dak is great.....so Dak can beat up on an 8-9 team playing piss-poor football and barely limped into the playoffs.......so Dak beat up on the slow fat kid and that is supposed to mean something? Interesting how when there is a viable opponent Dak sucks it hard.
 
Top