joseephuss
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 28,041
- Reaction score
- 6,920
So Alabama isn't deserving of a playoff spot, but there is a clamoring to go to an expanded playoff system that would then include Alabama.
I think my Frogs got the best matchup the could. Georgia would have out athleted them. Michigan plays a familiar style
You having a math problem?So Alabama isn't deserving of a playoff spot, but there is a clamoring to go to an expanded playoff system that would then include Alabama.
This year 4 was fine.12 teams is just too many.
Honestly, 4 is fine.
Half the time No. 3 and No. 4 are chum for the sharks anyway.
I think you may have missed his point, jtYou having a math problem?
Bama with 2 regular season losses, missing the SECCG and it's best wins over 4 loss teams doesn't deserve a spot in the top 4.
But yes, it is a top 12 team. And yes in the new format it would have to play it's way into facing a top 4 team.
Neither the coaches nor the AP nor the CFB committee ranked Bama top 4.
It was always super goofy to do so.
10-2 doesn't get it done.
Let's see if Bama can beat Kansas State. That Bowl match-up is actually one of the likely match ups had we gotten the 12-team playoff this year.
Flip a coin for me, but really, TCU has a better resume than the 2 loss Trojans....so not the same thing.OSU leap frogs USC and the top 3 remain the same…can’t see why OSU would leap frog over TCU as well…
someone like Marshall could end up unbeaten and not played a single team ranked; and that would be fine with you to be in the playoffs?This year 4 was fine.
They could've even just had two teams this year.
But under the current system, hypothetically there could be 7-8 undefeated teams at the end of the year and only 4 would get a shot.
As for 12? Yes it's probably too many.
But hey, I don't even like conference championship games. Other than the Pac 12, they ended up being meaningless (to the playoffs at least) this year, for example.
AS I have said, show me a year when there were more than 56 true contendersSo Alabama isn't deserving of a playoff spot, but there is a clamoring to go to an expanded playoff system that would then include Alabama.
He was rather doing both is my guess.I think you may have missed his point, jt
He wasn't arguing for Bama, he was arguing against a 12-team playoff.
At least that's how I read it
You having a math problem?
Bama with 2 regular season losses, missing the SECCG and it's best wins over 4 loss teams doesn't deserve a spot in the top 4.
But yes, it is a top 12 team. And yes in the new format it would have to play it's way into facing a top 4 team.
Neither the coaches nor the AP nor the CFB committee ranked Bama top 4.
It was always super goofy to do so.
10-2 doesn't get it done.
Let's see if Bama can beat Kansas State. That Bowl match-up is actually one of the likely match ups had we gotten the 12-team playoff this year.
Because "good enough" is relative to the question at hand.No math problem here. I don't think Alabama is good enough to be in the playoffs. Why expand the system to let in a team that isn't good enough?
I don't want to see a 12 team playoff. At worst, perhaps a 6 team system, but in reality as others have said it is rare there are 5 or 6 really good teams in any given season.
As someone who supposedly loves College Football you are clueless at one of the things that makes it different; that it used to be that EVERY GAME of a season was very importantBecause "good enough" is relative to the question at hand.
Bama 'could' be the best team in the country and win it all in a larger playoff format.
If so I am all for that.
Thats what every other sport does.
And in a 12 team tourney they are good enough.
They were not in a 4-team tourney.
Reducing 122 D1 colleges to a vote or a 2 team or even 4 team playoff have always been goofy.
But old men are slow to accept even obvious change.
12 team is quite good and will create a lot more quality football.
But Yes, like MLB, NHL, NBA, NFL, NCAAM, Champions League and NCAAW basketball all these things should flow through a conference or division and then seed into a playoff.
You should have zero argument at year's end and award a championship to someone that took on all comers.
one can get so fixated on diversity that you begin to discriminate the other way; extreme in any direction is badI also think he will do a fine job as a coach on the field but off the field, I'm not sure. Deion has never been shy with his strong push for diversity. Just read tweeter questioned why he mention college football was 70%, black players. In other words, he's never avoided open discussion regarding his support of diversity. Just not sure how that will sit with some powerful boosters coz he's not one to play politics.
I just said its possible that every P5 con. has an undefeated (r 1 loss deserving) champion....that's 5 right there without even getting started.someone like Marshall could end up unbeaten and not played a single team ranked; and that would be fine with you to be in the playoffs?
Show me a year when there were more than 4or 6 true contenders.