@Bobhaze Interesting thread topic. Before going on your usual anti-Jerry, anti-Cowboy front office rant
, did you bother to compare with other teams to see a pattern or irregularity? Or did you just conclude first and then cherry-pick data to 'prove' your conclusion?
Not sure if my numbers are exactly correct but I glanced over and gave it the college try at counting the last 25 years of drafting for the NFC East (1995-2020). Here is what I counted:
DAL: 21 WRs, 18 DEs, 24 LBs, 38 CB/DBs, and 12 DTs
NYG: 21 WRs, 18 DEs, 20 LBs, 31 CB/DBs, and 12 DTs
PHI: 26 WRs, 22 DEs, 21 LBs, 32 CB/DBs, and 13 DTs
WAS: 25 WRs, 13 DEs, 21 LBs, 28 CB/DBs, and 8 DTs
You drew the following conclusions:
1) "By that I mean which positions did the organization spend the most draft and trade capital to build a roster? The answer to that question reveals a big reason why this organization can’t seem to build a playoff winner."
2) "If you want to know what an organization values, look at where they spend their roster capital. For the Cowboys the last 25 years, that position is WR."
Having now compared the Cowboys to the three other NFC teams, do you still stand by your above conclusions?
Nice, thought-provoking thread for people like me who like data. Maybe tomorrow I will look to see the rounds WRs were drafted for the NFC East.
One thing to note is that there can be an obvious reason for the lack of picks at certain positions. If a team hits on a QB, chances are that team will not be drafting many QBs for the next ten years assuming the QB stays healthy and does not leave in FA. Another thing is that the draft is not a vacuum. What a team does in FA affects the draft. Sign two LBs in FA and chances are a team will draft fewer LBs the next several years.
Also, drafting BPA and not reaching for need will affect the results too. But they should even out over the long run.