OmerV
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,123
- Reaction score
- 22,616
I gave several reasons why that kind of suit could be seen as frivolous. What are your reasons it wouldn't?frivolous? nope.. lets see how this plays out.
I gave several reasons why that kind of suit could be seen as frivolous. What are your reasons it wouldn't?frivolous? nope.. lets see how this plays out.
See...I agree with your thinking here. I need to know what these payment amounts are at 24, 26, 28 years old. Jerry has increased his wealth significantly since this kids birth. If those trusts and amounts were based on 1996 money...the trust/payment amounts might be considered low ball payments.
This old scumbag is getting exactly what he deserves ....... I hope is name is smeared through the mud for years to come.
I gave several reasons why that kind of suit could be seen as frivolous. What are your reasons it wouldn't?
But the thing is at ages 24, 26 and 28 she is no longer a minor he would have financial responsibility for anyway. She couldn't even rely on the settlement her mom made because if it's held that she is subject to the mom's agreement then she bound by that,, and if its held she is not subject to the mom's agreement then the contractual obligation to make those payments dies anyway.
I went to law school for a year.... couldn't finish due to wife and 2 kids and just too much with a family. So, I know a little. One, if you haven't looked up specific laws for a particular state, you can't really say what will happen. We assume things are black and white. Parents are responsible for their children up through age 18.... uhm it isnt that simple. There have been some crazy cases of kids suing parents and winning that I was like, huh?
I can play this out for you.
Kid sues Jerry for emotional distress due to the "Trauma," this NDA has forced her through. In the report, it states something about the stress of seeing her siblings very public life. Stress?? what stress??? Well, Ive been told those are my siblings. My father is a very public figure in Texas and only a few short miles from where I live. Jerry is my dad... im 12 years old. I want to share this with my friends, but I have this enormous pressure on me that if I share this info with ANYONE my family will lose the money we live on. This is a DAILY emotional mountain I am carrying around on my back EVERY DAY...... as she cries on the stand. You cant imagine what my life has been like.... as she wipes more tears from her eyes. Then the psychiatrist takes the stand and testifies for hours what this kind of situation can do to a young child. What growing up without a child does to a child's emotional stability and sense of self worth. Now you think Jerry is gonna have a lawyer go up there and cross examine this person and try to tear them to shreds and only reinforce that the defendant is the monster they say he is. What kind of man would just throw their child in the corner all those years?
Now we put Jerry on the stand and he is depicted as this MONSTER that made an agreement that has caused great pain and suffering on this young woman for what? Only because she was his child?... oh the horror, oh the anger that the jury has inside towards this monster billionaire. If you dont think this exact scenario is possible, I think you are very naive when it comes to how this kind of civil suit could play out.
Likely income? Jerry in no way wants his public image on trial in this scenario and settles this out of court.
My immediate response to your above statement is "Why would someone pay a lawyer for an NDA and pay a person off to fulfill an NDA if the court doesnt back up the NDA?" It really seems like NDA's are worthless in situations like this. Regardless if the court backs Jerry up or not...I find this as a mistake on Jerry's part. What he wanted didnt happen. I guess it worked for a while and thats better than nothing. Hopefully Jerry is old enough to not give a ***** too much. I still feel it goes back to birth should be a mutual decision or the woman has to take full responsibility. She had the power to make the decision to give birth...now its the males choice to decide if he wants to give emotional or financial support.
.
Seems like you came to our little party withDesperate
The file is locked until the end of this month so I would expect Booger to try and make this quietly go away. Just as he did the Dalrymple situation.The question is does an NDA apply to the minor child ????? Im gonna guess the court says no. The NDA didnt say anything about mom disclosing who dad was to the child,... but then again, who knows what it said, none of us have been able to read it. Which is ultimately my point. None of us have a clue whats happening here. When it comes to a complicated situation like this, who knows the exact details of this case and how the court will deal with it.
Seems like you came to our little party with
The file is locked until the end of this month so I would expect Booger to try and make this quietly go away. Just as he did the Dalrymple situation.
Well, she wants to have her cake and eat it too. Seems to me that what she is suing for is to be able to violate the confidentiality part of the confidentiality agreement without terminating the whole "Jerry gives me money" part.Alexandra is seeking to establish legally she’s his daughter. By doing so it will violate the terms of the settlement .
It’s actually very noble on her part willing to sacrifice the remainder of payments .
Alexandra is seeking to establish legally she’s his daughter. By doing so it will violate the terms of the settlement .
It’s actually very noble on her part willing to sacrifice the remainder of payments .
I can’t imagine why anyone would defend Jethro in this case and not be sympathetic to Alex.
My sympathies for the Jones would reside with Gene and her children.
Alexandra is seeking to establish legally she’s his daughter. By doing so it will violate the terms of the settlement .
It’s actually very noble on her part willing to sacrifice the remainder of payments .
I can’t imagine why anyone would defend Jethro in this case and not be sympathetic to Alex.
My sympathies for the Jones would reside with Gene and her children.
ding ding ding... we have a winner.Well, she wants to have her cake and eat it too. Seems to me that what she is suing for is to be able to violate the confidentiality part of the confidentiality agreement without terminating the whole "Jerry gives me money" part.
She is getting some amount of money from Jones and she wants more. It's that simple.I dont see why Jerry couldnt work out a deal with her. A new NDA. He take the test and she receive money but not be allowed to talk about it if thats what Jerry wants. Unless she is asking for the ranch in exchange for the NDA or if Jerry knows that this will open the door for her to take the estate to the bank.
I agree that the kid is strong and noble if she is willing to forgo money AND NOT SUE IN THE FUTURE in exchange for paternity test. But...and Im not trying to defend Jerry here...why does she want to disrupt this guys life now? Sounds like its laying groundwork for future lawsuit, asking too much in exchange for an NDA or Jerry refusing the test. I still dont know why a test cant be done and all this be done in private behind the scenes?
It seems to come back to money. Someone is being unreasonable.
I dont see why Jerry couldnt work out a deal with her. A new NDA. He take the test and she receive money but not be allowed to talk about it if thats what Jerry wants. Unless she is asking for the ranch in exchange for the NDA or if Jerry knows that this will open the door for her to take the estate to the bank.
I agree that the kid is strong and noble if she is willing to forgo money AND NOT SUE IN THE FUTURE in exchange for paternity test. But...and Im not trying to defend Jerry here...why does she want to disrupt this guys life now? Sounds like its laying groundwork for future lawsuit, asking too much in exchange for an NDA or Jerry refusing the test. I still dont know why a test cant be done and all this be done in private behind the scenes?
It seems to come back to money. Someone is being unreasonable.
Alexandra is seeking to establish legally she’s his daughter. By doing so it will violate the terms of the settlement .
It’s actually very noble on her part willing to sacrifice the remainder of payments .
I can’t imagine why anyone would defend Jethro in this case and not be sympathetic to Alex.
My sympathies for the Jones would reside with Gene and her children.
I’ve read that and clearly states Alex is seeking to be released from the agreement. Which means she’s willing to forfeit the remainder of funds due to her to be able to name him her father.uhmmmmmm, wrong. Thats the entire reason she is suing, she wants to ensure the money from the trust keeps flowing... but more importantly, read this article from espn and it lays out what is going to happen next. Im not going to post it again, but read my previous post in this thread from this morning. I think my depiction of what is gonna happen is pretty spot on.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...lleges-dallas-cowboys-owner-biological-father