- Messages
- 62,330
- Reaction score
- 64,027
Rack;2358740 said:Sensationalization (if that's even a word). That's all they know.
They don't call it the Entertainment Sports Programming Network for nothing.
Rack;2358740 said:Sensationalization (if that's even a word). That's all they know.
You always know how to make me smile. Even when I don't want to.GimmeTheBall!;2358837 said:Wow.
Where you been all my life, Hos?
So, I take it you will join the peasants' movement?
And I agree re James/Carp.
And, damn, I miss that govt. cheese.
Did I stutter? I don't think so. We should have waxed the floor with you and we didn't. That is unacceptable.SkinsandTerps;2358904 said:I stopped watching ESPN about 4 years ago.
Wait...The Commanders are "panty wastes" ?
That is BS. I know you are frustrated and even pissed off. Yet they are not 1-3 over the last four. Request a mirror for the Cowboys.
bbgun;2359084 said:He threw a nice TD pass to Miles in Denver. Can't remember much more than that.
I focused my Offensive mad last week on dcfanatic's radio show. This week I limited it to Brad "Metamucil" Johnson. Trust me I am not blind to the need to continue screaming.Skin;2358805 said:I agree on those points, but your failure to single out the offensive coaches is noticeable and mistaken, in my opinion. Garrett and Houck deserve some heat. Everyone points to our offensive stats as proof we're doing something right. There are lies, darn lies and statistics. They are not telling the story.
Jason Garrett is lost right now and, in my opinion, is showing that he still has a lot of learning to do. One thing I don't get is when I watch a team like the Texans who start a rookie LT and an assortment of other average lineman, they are somehow able to move the ball, complete a high percentage of passes and get the ball to their best player (Andre Johnson) despite all the spooky double teams that we can't seem to overcome. Part of it is that their QB actually gets rid of the ball when his back foots hits on the third step back. Maybe Jason needs to call Gary Kubiak. Now the Texans have not done this for the majority of the year and they did beat a terrible Lions team yesterday and an average Dolphins team two weeks ago, but I don't understand how they've figured out how to deal with leaky pass protection and double teams, with less talent than we have.
Who would have thought that Tony Sparano's departure would lead to these offensive woes?
Hostile;2359110 said:Did I stutter? I don't think so. We should have waxed the floor with you and we didn't. That is unacceptable.
Can I say that the Commanders are a waste of panties? Just want to know what you think is fair and all.SkinsandTerps;2359168 said:The Commanders have been a tough team for years now. They may not light it up on offense, but typically defensively they show up.
You didn't because you, and the rest of Cowboys nation evaluates talent further than it really is. You don't have a TEAM right now, you have players.
DallasEast;2359189 said:Can I say that the Commanders are a waste of panties? Just want to know what you think is fair and all.
Oh spare me the lecture on the Skins worthiness. It simply isn't relevant to the rant I am on. If you don't like my post don't open the thread. I could give a damn if it hurts your eyes.SkinsandTerps;2359168 said:The Commanders have been a tough team for years now. They may not light it up on offense, but typically defensively they show up.
You didn't because you, and the rest of Cowboys nation evaluates talent further than it really is. You don't have a TEAM right now, you have players.
Washington played well enough offensively to beat the Cowboys. Now, since I've answered your question, back to mine. "Can I say that the Commanders are a waste of panties? Just want to know what you think is fair and all."SkinsandTerps;2359238 said:Offensively against the Cowboys...How did the Commanders fare ?
Hostile;2359243 said:Oh spare me the lecture on the Skins worthiness. It simply isn't relevant to the rant I am on. If you don't like my post don't open the thread. I could give a damn if it hurts your eyes.
DallasEast;2359259 said:Washington played well enough offensively to beat the Cowboys. Now, since I've answered your question, back to mine. "Can I say that the Commanders are a waste of panties? Just want to know what you think is fair and all."
Don't bother to answer this question since you can't seem to answer mine, but don't you believe it's cowardly not to answer a question which is pretty much straight forward?SkinsandTerps;2359316 said:I think it's odd that someone would dismiss the Commanders as competitors, to that level. They are not great but, nor horrible.
Good advice on the Nyquil.SkinsandTerps;2359316 said:Take some Nyquil. I am not pumping up the Commanders, nor belittling the Cowboys. As many people say, it is what it is.
DallasEast;2359327 said:Don't bother to answer this question since you can't seem to answer mine, but don't you believe it's cowardly not to answer a question which is pretty much straight forward?
I have no problem with the team assembled. I do not believe there is an owner or honest fan anywhere who wouldn't swap most of our guys for theirs straight across.Juke99;2359322 said:If those passes yesterday had any more air under them you could attach a gondola and give hot air balloon rides.
:laugh2:
Another Hos classic.
The problem, Oh Cranky Ogre, is that this team also displayed no gonads under Parcells too.
So, what's the constant?
The players and the GM.
And who brought the players in? The GM.
It always, after Jimmy Johnson, falls at the feet of the GM.
I never asked your opinion whether you believed it was a serious question or not. A simple yes or no answer would have done the trick.SkinsandTerps;2359345 said:A waste of panties... Is that a serious question ?
It's not the first time that the Cowboys have lost to the Commanders and ended up having a much better year than Washington. Next question.SkinsandTerps;2359345 said:What does that say about the Cowboys since they lost to that "waste of panties"?
Yes or no.SkinsandTerps;2359345 said:Your question has been answered, sorry if you missed it.